Implementation of the Distress Assessment and Response Tool at the Kuwait Cancer Control Centre

Mariam Al-Awadhi, B. Gascon, Nawar Albarak, Ghazlan Aldeweesh, A. Hamadah, Hazim Abdulkarim, Yvonne W Leung, G. Rodin, Madeline Li
{"title":"Implementation of the Distress Assessment and Response Tool at the Kuwait Cancer Control Centre","authors":"Mariam Al-Awadhi, B. Gascon, Nawar Albarak, Ghazlan Aldeweesh, A. Hamadah, Hazim Abdulkarim, Yvonne W Leung, G. Rodin, Madeline Li","doi":"10.1097/OR9.0000000000000083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Abstract Background: This report describes the implementation of a comprehensive distress screening program at the Kuwait Cancer Control Center (KCCC), the first such initiative in the Middle East. A Kuwait-adapted version of the Distress Assessment and Response Tool (K-DART) was used in this screening program. Methods: Paper-based K-DART surveys were piloted in the lymphoma clinic at KCCC in July 2013, followed by gradual hospital-wide expansion. K-DART included patient-reported outcome measures to assess cancer-related physical and emotional symptoms and practical problems. English and Arabic translations of these measures were used. Trained nurses administered K-DART and followed up with the oncologist for patients with moderate-to-high levels of distress. Descriptive data are reported for prevalence of distress, psychosocial oncology program (PSOP) referral rates, and patient and staff satisfaction with K-DART. Results: A total of 1,153 K-DART surveys were completed by 618 patients in the pilot lymphoma clinic, with screening rates increasing from 33.5% to 75.3% over the first 12 months of implementation. Among all K-DART completers, 85/618 (13.8%) were referred to PSOP, whereas only 1/955 (0.1%) of K-DART noncompleters were referred to PSOP. After hospital-wide expansion of screening, a total of 2,017 patients completed K-DART in the first year of implementation. Both patients and physicians reported high satisfaction with K-DART, which was reported to enhance patient–physician communication and improve clinical care. Conclusion: Implementation of K-DART in a Middle Eastern country is feasible and facilitates a more comprehensive approach to cancer care, contributing to the successful establishment of a PSOP at the KCCC.","PeriodicalId":73915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychosocial oncology research and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychosocial oncology research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OR9.0000000000000083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Abstract Background: This report describes the implementation of a comprehensive distress screening program at the Kuwait Cancer Control Center (KCCC), the first such initiative in the Middle East. A Kuwait-adapted version of the Distress Assessment and Response Tool (K-DART) was used in this screening program. Methods: Paper-based K-DART surveys were piloted in the lymphoma clinic at KCCC in July 2013, followed by gradual hospital-wide expansion. K-DART included patient-reported outcome measures to assess cancer-related physical and emotional symptoms and practical problems. English and Arabic translations of these measures were used. Trained nurses administered K-DART and followed up with the oncologist for patients with moderate-to-high levels of distress. Descriptive data are reported for prevalence of distress, psychosocial oncology program (PSOP) referral rates, and patient and staff satisfaction with K-DART. Results: A total of 1,153 K-DART surveys were completed by 618 patients in the pilot lymphoma clinic, with screening rates increasing from 33.5% to 75.3% over the first 12 months of implementation. Among all K-DART completers, 85/618 (13.8%) were referred to PSOP, whereas only 1/955 (0.1%) of K-DART noncompleters were referred to PSOP. After hospital-wide expansion of screening, a total of 2,017 patients completed K-DART in the first year of implementation. Both patients and physicians reported high satisfaction with K-DART, which was reported to enhance patient–physician communication and improve clinical care. Conclusion: Implementation of K-DART in a Middle Eastern country is feasible and facilitates a more comprehensive approach to cancer care, contributing to the successful establishment of a PSOP at the KCCC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在科威特癌症控制中心实施痛苦评估和应对工具
补充数字内容可在文本中获得。背景:本报告描述了科威特癌症控制中心(KCCC)实施的一项全面的窘迫筛查计划,这是中东地区第一个这样的倡议。在这个筛选项目中使用了科威特版的遇险评估和反应工具(K-DART)。方法:2013年7月在KCCC淋巴瘤诊所试点纸质K-DART调查,随后逐步在全院范围内推广。K-DART包括患者报告的结果测量,以评估癌症相关的身体和情绪症状和实际问题。使用了这些措施的英文和阿拉伯文译本。训练有素的护士使用K-DART,并与肿瘤学家一起对中度至重度痛苦的患者进行随访。描述性数据报告了痛苦的患病率,心理社会肿瘤学项目(PSOP)转诊率,以及患者和工作人员对K-DART的满意度。结果:在试点淋巴瘤诊所,618名患者共完成了1153项K-DART调查,在实施的前12个月,筛查率从33.5%上升到75.3%。在所有K-DART完井者中,有85/618(13.8%)被参考了PSOP,而只有1/955(0.1%)的K-DART未完井者被参考了PSOP。在医院范围内扩大筛查后,在实施的第一年,共有2,017名患者完成了K-DART。患者和医生都对K-DART表示高度满意,据报道,K-DART加强了医患沟通,改善了临床护理。结论:在中东国家实施K-DART是可行的,并促进了更全面的癌症治疗方法,有助于在KCCC成功建立PSOP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reflections on the contribution of IPOS to psycho-oncology Evaluation of frailty, cognitive function, and age as prognostic factors for survival in patients with IDH1wild-type high-grade glioma Survivors of child and adolescent cancer experiences of bullying at school or work: self-report and parent proxy report Family cancer caregiver use of and benefit from an internet-delivered insomnia intervention: results from a single-group feasibility trial The role of peer support and patient navigation for empowerment in breast cancer survivors: implications for community cancer control
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1