The politics of critical policy sociology: mobilities, moorings and elite networks

IF 4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Critical Studies in Education Pub Date : 2021-02-14 DOI:10.1080/17508487.2021.1878467
Glenn C. Savage, J. Gerrard, T. Gale, Tebeje Molla
{"title":"The politics of critical policy sociology: mobilities, moorings and elite networks","authors":"Glenn C. Savage, J. Gerrard, T. Gale, Tebeje Molla","doi":"10.1080/17508487.2021.1878467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article reflects on what doing critical policy sociology means in shifting theoretical, empirical and methodological contexts of education. We focus our analytical lens on two primary considerations. First, we reflect on the politics of criticality, examining differing claims and debates about what it means to do critical research and be a critical researcher of education policy, paying particular attention to how critical policy sociologists position their work in relation to elite power and policy networks. Second, we build on these foundations to consider the trend towards researching mobilities within critical policy sociology, arguing that contemporary ‘follow the policy’ research risks orienting researchers to the problems and agendas already established by elite policy agents and organisations, while obscuring the not-so-mobile forces that continue to define education policy and practice. We also raise questions about the elite networks and privileged levels of resourcing typically required to conduct this kind of research. In conclusion, we invite further discussion on the politics of knowledge production and challenges for policy sociologists seeking to be critical in shifting contexts.","PeriodicalId":47434,"journal":{"name":"Critical Studies in Education","volume":"62 1","pages":"306 - 321"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17508487.2021.1878467","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Studies in Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2021.1878467","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article reflects on what doing critical policy sociology means in shifting theoretical, empirical and methodological contexts of education. We focus our analytical lens on two primary considerations. First, we reflect on the politics of criticality, examining differing claims and debates about what it means to do critical research and be a critical researcher of education policy, paying particular attention to how critical policy sociologists position their work in relation to elite power and policy networks. Second, we build on these foundations to consider the trend towards researching mobilities within critical policy sociology, arguing that contemporary ‘follow the policy’ research risks orienting researchers to the problems and agendas already established by elite policy agents and organisations, while obscuring the not-so-mobile forces that continue to define education policy and practice. We also raise questions about the elite networks and privileged levels of resourcing typically required to conduct this kind of research. In conclusion, we invite further discussion on the politics of knowledge production and challenges for policy sociologists seeking to be critical in shifting contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
批判政策社会学的政治:流动性、系泊和精英网络
本文反思了在教育理论、实证和方法论语境的变迁中,做批判政策社会学意味着什么。我们将分析焦点集中在两个主要考虑因素上。首先,我们反思批判性的政治,检查关于做批判性研究和成为教育政策的批判性研究者意味着什么的不同主张和辩论,特别关注批判性政策社会学家如何将他们的工作与精英权力和政策网络联系起来。其次,我们在这些基础上考虑在批判政策社会学中研究流动性的趋势,认为当代“跟随政策”的研究有可能将研究人员导向精英政策代理人和组织已经建立的问题和议程,同时模糊了继续定义教育政策和实践的不那么流动的力量。我们还对精英网络和进行此类研究通常所需的特权资源水平提出了质疑。总之,我们邀请进一步讨论知识生产的政治和政策社会学家在不断变化的环境中寻求批判性的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Studies in Education
Critical Studies in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Critical Studies in Education is one of the few international journals devoted to a critical sociology of education, although it welcomes submissions with a critical stance that draw on other disciplines (e.g. philosophy, social geography, history) in order to understand ''the social''. Two interests frame the journal’s critical approach to research: (1) who benefits (and who does not) from current and historical social arrangements in education and, (2) from the standpoint of the least advantaged, what can be done about inequitable arrangements. Informed by this approach, articles published in the journal draw on post-structural, feminist, postcolonial and other critical orientations to critique education systems and to identify alternatives for education policy, practice and research.
期刊最新文献
Public education and teacher professionalism in an age of accountability Queer youth and critical sexuality education pedagogies within networked publics: implications for school-based practice Grappling with wicked problems: teacher professionalism and pedagogical mappings for reparative futures The role of online crisis actors in teachers’ work and lives Beyond conventional critique in education: embracing the affirmative
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1