An Ottoman Holy Land: Two Early Modern Travel Accounts and Imperial Subjectivity

IF 0.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies Pub Date : 2021-08-30 DOI:10.1353/sho.2021.0014
O. Bashkin, Sooyong Kim
{"title":"An Ottoman Holy Land: Two Early Modern Travel Accounts and Imperial Subjectivity","authors":"O. Bashkin, Sooyong Kim","doi":"10.1353/sho.2021.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:This study investigates how the Holy Land was experienced and perceived in the early modern era, by comparing the accounts of two travelers representing distinct but complementary vantage points: Evliya Çelebi (d. ca. 1685), a Sunni Muslim from Istanbul, the capital of the Ottoman Empire, and Shemu'el ben David (d. 1673), a Karaite Jew from the Crimean Khanate, a vassal state on the periphery. Considering their specific views of the Holy Land and the kinds of traditions that the two contemporaries relate about the same sites they visited, we argue that both perceived the Holy Land not only through an intersecting scriptural lens, but also through a similar imperial lens that drew attention to and valorized the Ottoman presence over the sacred territory. Thus more broadly, the comparative study offers an alternative non-Eurocentric frame for exploring the relationship between empire, subject, and the holy in the early modern era.","PeriodicalId":21809,"journal":{"name":"Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies","volume":"39 1","pages":"1 - 31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sho.2021.0014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT:This study investigates how the Holy Land was experienced and perceived in the early modern era, by comparing the accounts of two travelers representing distinct but complementary vantage points: Evliya Çelebi (d. ca. 1685), a Sunni Muslim from Istanbul, the capital of the Ottoman Empire, and Shemu'el ben David (d. 1673), a Karaite Jew from the Crimean Khanate, a vassal state on the periphery. Considering their specific views of the Holy Land and the kinds of traditions that the two contemporaries relate about the same sites they visited, we argue that both perceived the Holy Land not only through an intersecting scriptural lens, but also through a similar imperial lens that drew attention to and valorized the Ottoman presence over the sacred territory. Thus more broadly, the comparative study offers an alternative non-Eurocentric frame for exploring the relationship between empire, subject, and the holy in the early modern era.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奥斯曼圣地:两个早期现代旅行记述与帝国主体性
摘要:本研究通过比较两位旅行者的叙述,探讨了近代早期人们是如何体验和感知圣地的。他们分别是来自奥斯曼帝国首都伊斯坦布尔的逊尼派穆斯林Evliya Çelebi(约1685年)和来自边缘附属国克里米亚汗国的卡拉特犹太人Shemu’el ben David(约1673年)。考虑到他们对圣地的特定看法,以及两位同时代人对他们所访问的同一遗址的各种传统,我们认为,他们不仅通过交叉的圣经镜头来看待圣地,而且通过类似的帝国镜头来关注和巩固奥斯曼帝国在神圣领土上的存在。因此,更广泛地说,比较研究为探索近代早期帝国、臣民和神圣之间的关系提供了另一种非欧洲中心的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Ladin in Lineage: Through the Doors of Jewish Gendered Life at Yeshiva University's Stern College for Women Un-Settled Questions: Frontier Logic and Satmar Political Theology A Specter Haunting Holocaust Studies: The Muselmann Did Jews Die as Muslims in Auschwitz? Specters of the Muselmann Transmatriation? Avishag the Shunammite in Three Contemporary Israeli Novels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1