"Blindness Gain" as Worldmaking: Audio Description as a New "partage du sensible"

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE, ROMANCE ESPRIT CREATEUR Pub Date : 2022-01-24 DOI:10.1353/esp.2021.0045
Marion Chottin, Hannah Thompson
{"title":"\"Blindness Gain\" as Worldmaking: Audio Description as a New \"partage du sensible\"","authors":"Marion Chottin, Hannah Thompson","doi":"10.1353/esp.2021.0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IN THIS ARTICLE we use our experiences of co-creating creative audio descriptions at the Musée du quai Branly in Paris to suggest that the worldmaking practices of challenge, collaboration, action, and dialogue offer a means to call into question the traditional ways of accessing museum and gallery content that still prevail in (French) society.1 We define “disability’s worldmaking” in the museum or art gallery as a two-part process. First, we challenge the ‘givenness’ of the hierarchies, relationships, and assumptions that govern visitor experience in the museum. Second, we offer an alternative model of visitor engagement where active and dialogic co-creation provides an inclusive alternative to ocularcentric museum experiences. Together, these acts of worldmaking promise an alternative mode of being in the museum that suggests a new politics of access. By going beyond current understandings of ‘inclusion,’ our project does not limit itself to giving disabled people a museum experience analogous to that of non-disabled people. Instead, it explores and celebrates alternative modes of engaging with art that do more than merely echo normative museum experiences and which, more broadly, open up a new way of making society. Our definition of worldmaking is a counterpoint to Jacques Rancière’s concept of “le partage du sensible” and is informed by the concept of “blindness gain.” In Rancière’s words, le partage du sensible as a political concept is “ce système d’évidences sensibles qui donne à voir en même temps l’existence d’un commun et les découpages qui y définissent les places et les parts respectives.”2 Elsewhere, he elaborates on this definition, describing it as “la façon dont les formes d’inclusion et d’exclusion qui définissent la participation à une vie commune sont d’abord configurées au sein même de l’expérience sensible de la vie.”3 In other words, according to Rancière, there is “une esthétique de la politique”: the assignment of a place to each person in society is manifested through the sensory experience itself, and, for him, particularly in a division between visibility and invisibility; audibility and inaudibility: those who participate in public life are visible and audible, while those who do not are invisible and inaudible (kept hidden and silent within the private sphere). Given that, for Rancière, the realm of art is a privileged place of sensory experience, it is therefore also a privileged place for le partage du sensible, which expresses who has a place in society and who does not. We argue that, nowadays, it is in the museum","PeriodicalId":54063,"journal":{"name":"ESPRIT CREATEUR","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESPRIT CREATEUR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/esp.2021.0045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, ROMANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

IN THIS ARTICLE we use our experiences of co-creating creative audio descriptions at the Musée du quai Branly in Paris to suggest that the worldmaking practices of challenge, collaboration, action, and dialogue offer a means to call into question the traditional ways of accessing museum and gallery content that still prevail in (French) society.1 We define “disability’s worldmaking” in the museum or art gallery as a two-part process. First, we challenge the ‘givenness’ of the hierarchies, relationships, and assumptions that govern visitor experience in the museum. Second, we offer an alternative model of visitor engagement where active and dialogic co-creation provides an inclusive alternative to ocularcentric museum experiences. Together, these acts of worldmaking promise an alternative mode of being in the museum that suggests a new politics of access. By going beyond current understandings of ‘inclusion,’ our project does not limit itself to giving disabled people a museum experience analogous to that of non-disabled people. Instead, it explores and celebrates alternative modes of engaging with art that do more than merely echo normative museum experiences and which, more broadly, open up a new way of making society. Our definition of worldmaking is a counterpoint to Jacques Rancière’s concept of “le partage du sensible” and is informed by the concept of “blindness gain.” In Rancière’s words, le partage du sensible as a political concept is “ce système d’évidences sensibles qui donne à voir en même temps l’existence d’un commun et les découpages qui y définissent les places et les parts respectives.”2 Elsewhere, he elaborates on this definition, describing it as “la façon dont les formes d’inclusion et d’exclusion qui définissent la participation à une vie commune sont d’abord configurées au sein même de l’expérience sensible de la vie.”3 In other words, according to Rancière, there is “une esthétique de la politique”: the assignment of a place to each person in society is manifested through the sensory experience itself, and, for him, particularly in a division between visibility and invisibility; audibility and inaudibility: those who participate in public life are visible and audible, while those who do not are invisible and inaudible (kept hidden and silent within the private sphere). Given that, for Rancière, the realm of art is a privileged place of sensory experience, it is therefore also a privileged place for le partage du sensible, which expresses who has a place in society and who does not. We argue that, nowadays, it is in the museum
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“失明增益”是世界性的:音频描述是一个新的“明智的部分”
在这篇文章中,我们利用我们在巴黎杜奎布兰利博物馆共同创作创造性音频描述的经验,提出了挑战、合作、行动、,对话提供了一种方式来质疑在(法国)社会中仍然盛行的访问博物馆和美术馆内容的传统方式。1我们将博物馆或美术馆中的“残疾创造世界”定义为一个由两部分组成的过程。首先,我们挑战管理博物馆游客体验的等级制度、关系和假设的“给定性”。其次,我们提供了一种游客参与的替代模式,在这种模式下,积极和对话的共同创作为以眼球为中心的博物馆体验提供了一个包容性的替代方案。总之,这些创造世界的行为预示着博物馆的另一种存在方式,这表明了一种新的进入政治。通过超越目前对“包容”的理解,我们的项目并不局限于为残疾人提供类似于非残疾人的博物馆体验。相反,它探索并庆祝了参与艺术的替代模式,这些模式不仅仅是呼应规范的博物馆体验,更广泛地说,它开辟了一种创造社会的新方式。我们对世界创造的定义与雅克·兰齐埃的“理智的伴侣”概念形成了鲜明对比,并受到了“失明”概念的影响,作为一个政治概念,理智的一部分是“在社区和政变的存在时间内,为理智提供系统,以分别完成地方和部分。”2在其他地方,他详细阐述了这一定义,将其描述为“包容和排斥的形式最终决定了社区的参与,这是对生活经验的合理配置。”3换句话说,根据Rancière的说法,存在着“政治的统一”:社会中每个人的位置分配通过感官体验本身来表现,对他来说,尤其是在可见性和不可见性之间的划分;可听性和可听性:那些参与公共生活的人是可见的和可听的,而那些不参与的人是看不见的和听不见的(在私人领域保持隐藏和沉默)。考虑到,对兰齐埃来说,艺术领域是一个感官体验的特权场所,因此,它也是理性伴侣的特权场所。理性伴侣表达了谁在社会中有一席之地,谁没有。我们认为,如今,它在博物馆里
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ESPRIT CREATEUR
ESPRIT CREATEUR LITERATURE, ROMANCE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: For more than forty years, L"Esprit Créateur has published studies on French and Francophone literature, film, criticism, and culture. The journal features articles representing a variety of methodologies and critical approaches. Exploring all periods of French literature and thought, L"Esprit Créateur focuses on topics that define French and Francophone Studies today.
期刊最新文献
Introduction: Characters in/as Connection Relational Character Constellations: Maryse Condé's Traversée de la mangrove and Maylis de Kerangal's Réparer les vivants Déjà lu ?: On Rachid Boudjedra's Recurring Jewish-Muslim Figure Deciphering 1848: Repetition and Degradation in Madame Bovary Relier l'arrière-plan : Le réseau des figurants dans le roman de type réaliste du XIXe siècle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1