Trianon: 101 Years Later

IF 0.2 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Hungarian Cultural Studies Pub Date : 2022-07-19 DOI:10.5195/ahea.2022.461
András Ludányi
{"title":"Trianon: 101 Years Later","authors":"András Ludányi","doi":"10.5195/ahea.2022.461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This keynote address on Trianon was to be presented at the treaty’s 100th anniversary in 2020 at the Pécs Conference of AHEA. Because of Covid 19 the conference was not held. It was organized a year later in 2021 via virtual internet presentations. Thus, the new title for the keynote became “Trianon: 101 Years Later.” The address focuses on the historical background of this event and on the demographic, cultural, economic and political consequences for Hungarians and East-Central Europe. The analysis begins with the punitive nature of this dictated and imposed treaty and sets out to look at the causes which made this a lasting decision. Without attempting to blame solely the major powers or the immediate neighbors of Hungary, which became the successor states, the analysis also focuses on the major blunders of Hungarian leaders on the Left and on the Right. The devastating consequences for all the peoples of the region, but particularly for the Hungarians who became minorities in their own homelands in the successor states, requires a look at exit strategies from this quagmire. During the past 101 years nationalists, communists, fascists and liberal capitalists have all proposed solutions but to this day the problems remain. Although the root causes of the problem have been described by such outstanding scholars as Pál Teleki, Zsombor Szász, C.A. Macartney, and more recently Nándor Bárdi, Balázs Ablonczy, László Szarka, Zoltán Kántor and many others, the political will to work for solutions has not been present. The intent of this keynote is not to rehash the past but to provoke a re-thinking about the entire region’s interests and future.","PeriodicalId":40442,"journal":{"name":"Hungarian Cultural Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hungarian Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/ahea.2022.461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This keynote address on Trianon was to be presented at the treaty’s 100th anniversary in 2020 at the Pécs Conference of AHEA. Because of Covid 19 the conference was not held. It was organized a year later in 2021 via virtual internet presentations. Thus, the new title for the keynote became “Trianon: 101 Years Later.” The address focuses on the historical background of this event and on the demographic, cultural, economic and political consequences for Hungarians and East-Central Europe. The analysis begins with the punitive nature of this dictated and imposed treaty and sets out to look at the causes which made this a lasting decision. Without attempting to blame solely the major powers or the immediate neighbors of Hungary, which became the successor states, the analysis also focuses on the major blunders of Hungarian leaders on the Left and on the Right. The devastating consequences for all the peoples of the region, but particularly for the Hungarians who became minorities in their own homelands in the successor states, requires a look at exit strategies from this quagmire. During the past 101 years nationalists, communists, fascists and liberal capitalists have all proposed solutions but to this day the problems remain. Although the root causes of the problem have been described by such outstanding scholars as Pál Teleki, Zsombor Szász, C.A. Macartney, and more recently Nándor Bárdi, Balázs Ablonczy, László Szarka, Zoltán Kántor and many others, the political will to work for solutions has not been present. The intent of this keynote is not to rehash the past but to provoke a re-thinking about the entire region’s interests and future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特里亚农:101年后
这篇关于Trianon的主题演讲将在2020年AHEA的Pécs会议上发表在该条约100周年之际。由于新冠肺炎疫情19,会议没有举行。它是在一年后的2021年通过虚拟互联网演示组织的。因此,主题演讲的新标题变成了“特里亚农:101年后”。演讲重点关注这一事件的历史背景,以及匈牙利人和中东欧的人口、文化、经济和政治后果。分析从这一强制性条约的惩罚性开始,并着手研究使这一决定成为持久决定的原因。在不试图仅仅指责成为继承国的匈牙利的主要大国或近邻的情况下,分析还集中在匈牙利左翼和右翼领导人的重大失误上。对该地区所有人民,特别是对在继承国自己的家园成为少数民族的匈牙利人来说,造成的毁灭性后果需要考虑从这一泥潭中退出的战略。在过去的101年里,民族主义者、共产主义者、法西斯主义者和自由资本家都提出了解决方案,但时至今日,问题依然存在。尽管Pál Teleki、Zsombor SzáSz、C.A.Macartney等杰出学者已经描述了这个问题的根本原因,最近还有Nándor Bárdi、Balázs Ablonczy、lászlóSzarka、ZoltáN Kántor和许多其他人,但他们还没有表现出寻求解决方案的政治意愿。这一主旨发言的目的不是重提过去,而是引发对整个地区利益和未来的重新思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hungarian Cultural Studies
Hungarian Cultural Studies SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Narrating the Danube Swabian Identity and Experience from Women's Perspective Pánczél Hegedűs, János. 2022. Nem forradalom, hanem szabadságharc: Mindszenty József 1956-os helyzete és tevékenysége (Not a Revolution, but a Fight for Freedom: The Position and Activities of József Mindszenty in 1956). Budapest: L’Harmattan. 390 pp. Translanguaging in Family Communication Possibilities for a New Social Model? Materiality and Making Meaning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1