Bruegger's exercises vs deep cervical flexor training in asymptomatic participants with forward head posture: a randomised controlled trial

Ashma Chodankar, P. Gurudut, A. Welling
{"title":"Bruegger's exercises vs deep cervical flexor training in asymptomatic participants with forward head posture: a randomised controlled trial","authors":"Ashma Chodankar, P. Gurudut, A. Welling","doi":"10.12968/ijtr.2020.0149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Aims Forward head posture is the most frequent postural deviation in typically healthy individuals and is associated with rounding of the shoulders. Prevention should be considered when it is at the asymptomatic stage by screening and early exercise intervention. The aim of the study was to examine the effects of Bruegger's exercises compared to deep cervical flexor training in asymptomatic participants with forward head posture. Methods This randomised controlled trial included 51 participants with asymptomatic forward head posture, who were allocated to one of three groups. One group undertook Bruegger's exercises with an elastic resistance band, another group performed deep cervical flexor training with a pressure biofeedback unit and the control group performed isometric neck exercises. Outcomes measured were the craniovertebral angle, the craniocervical flexion endurance test and the Pectoralis Minor Index, which were assessed at baseline on day 1 and at the end of the 3-week intervention. Follow-up assessment was undertaken for craniovertebral angle at 6 and 9 weeks from day 1 of the intervention. Statistical analysis included paired t-tests, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, analysis of variance and the Kruskal–Wallis test. Results All three groups showed improvements in craniovertebral angle and the craniocervical flexion endurance test when compared between pre- and post-intervention. Only those in the Bruegger's exercises group showed an increase in the length of the pectoralis minor according to the Pectoralis Minor Index. Deep cervical flexor muscle endurance increased significantly (P<0.0002) for those in the Bruegger's exercises group and deep cervical flexor training group. At the end of the intervention (week 3) (P<0.0205) and follow up at week 9 (P<0.0029), individuals in the Bruegger's exercises group had maintained the craniovertebral angle correction for longer than those in the deep cervical flexor training and control group. Conclusions Bruegger's exercises with an elastic resistance band was found to be an effective intervention exercise to correct posture from head to scapula and can be included in the treatment of patients with postural head and neck issues.","PeriodicalId":46562,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2020.0149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Aims Forward head posture is the most frequent postural deviation in typically healthy individuals and is associated with rounding of the shoulders. Prevention should be considered when it is at the asymptomatic stage by screening and early exercise intervention. The aim of the study was to examine the effects of Bruegger's exercises compared to deep cervical flexor training in asymptomatic participants with forward head posture. Methods This randomised controlled trial included 51 participants with asymptomatic forward head posture, who were allocated to one of three groups. One group undertook Bruegger's exercises with an elastic resistance band, another group performed deep cervical flexor training with a pressure biofeedback unit and the control group performed isometric neck exercises. Outcomes measured were the craniovertebral angle, the craniocervical flexion endurance test and the Pectoralis Minor Index, which were assessed at baseline on day 1 and at the end of the 3-week intervention. Follow-up assessment was undertaken for craniovertebral angle at 6 and 9 weeks from day 1 of the intervention. Statistical analysis included paired t-tests, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, analysis of variance and the Kruskal–Wallis test. Results All three groups showed improvements in craniovertebral angle and the craniocervical flexion endurance test when compared between pre- and post-intervention. Only those in the Bruegger's exercises group showed an increase in the length of the pectoralis minor according to the Pectoralis Minor Index. Deep cervical flexor muscle endurance increased significantly (P<0.0002) for those in the Bruegger's exercises group and deep cervical flexor training group. At the end of the intervention (week 3) (P<0.0205) and follow up at week 9 (P<0.0029), individuals in the Bruegger's exercises group had maintained the craniovertebral angle correction for longer than those in the deep cervical flexor training and control group. Conclusions Bruegger's exercises with an elastic resistance band was found to be an effective intervention exercise to correct posture from head to scapula and can be included in the treatment of patients with postural head and neck issues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bruegger运动与颈深屈肌训练在无症状参与者中的比较:一项随机对照试验
背景/目的头部前倾是典型健康人最常见的姿势偏差,与肩部变圆有关。当它处于无症状阶段时,应考虑通过筛查和早期运动干预进行预防。这项研究的目的是检查Bruegger运动与颈深屈肌训练在无症状的头部前倾参与者中的效果。方法这项随机对照试验包括51名无症状前倾姿势的参与者,他们被分为三组之一。一组用弹性阻力带进行Bruegger锻炼,另一组用压力生物反馈装置进行颈深屈肌训练,对照组进行等长颈部锻炼。测量的结果是在基线第1天和3周干预结束时评估的颅椎角、颅颈屈曲耐力测试和胸小指数。从干预的第1天起,在第6周和第9周对颅椎角进行随访评估。统计分析包括配对t检验、Wilcoxon符号秩检验、方差分析和Kruskal–Wallis检验。结果与干预前后相比,三组患者的颅椎角度和颅颈屈曲耐力测试均有改善。根据小胸肌指数,只有Bruegger运动组的人显示小胸肌的长度增加。Bruegger运动组和颈深屈肌训练组的颈深屈肌耐力显著提高(P<0.0002)。在干预结束时(第3周)(P<0.0205)和第9周随访时(P<0.0029),Bruegger运动组的患者维持颅椎角矫正的时间比颈深屈肌训练和对照组的患者长。结论Bruegger弹性阻力带运动是纠正从头部到肩胛骨姿势的有效干预运动,可用于治疗姿势性头颈部问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
40.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation (IJTR) publishes original research, providing a platform for the latest key research findings in therapy and rehabilitation. Review and analysis articles are invited internationally to enable the sharing of practices and developments worldwide, and to raise awareness of different cultural influences in health care. IJTR provides an interdisciplinary approach to therapy and rehabilitation by: -Providing a well-referenced source of information to all professionals involved in therapy and rehabilitation worldwide, including occupational therapists, physiotherapists, chiropodists and podiatrists, radiographers, speech and language therapists and orthoptists -Providing a peer-reviewed source of original research and information presented in an accessible, informative and professional medium -Providing a forum for the discussion of new ideas, information and issues relating to therapy and rehabilitation -Creating an awareness of the national and international issues affecting professionals involved in therapy and rehabilitation -Encouraging collaboration and sharing of new ideas between professions worldwide
期刊最新文献
The relationships between upper extremity muscle strength and endurance with respiratory function, functional capacity and quality of life in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis Predicting outcomes, describing complications and optimising rehabilitation in patients undergoing lung transplantation Integrating the wrist-worn tracker in cardiac rehabilitation programmes: a scoping review Amplitude training in occupational therapy for the treatment of Parkinson's disease: a feasibility study Comparing the reliability of the Goniometer Pro application and flexicurve for measuring thoracic kyphosis: a cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1