The Association of Electronic Cigarette Use With SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 Disease Severity

IF 2.1 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Tobacco Use Insights Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1179173x221096638
A. Burnett-Hartman, Shauna Goldberg Scott, J. D. Powers, Morgan N Clennin, J. Lyons, M. Gray, H. Feigelson
{"title":"The Association of Electronic Cigarette Use With SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 Disease Severity","authors":"A. Burnett-Hartman, Shauna Goldberg Scott, J. D. Powers, Morgan N Clennin, J. Lyons, M. Gray, H. Feigelson","doi":"10.1177/1179173x221096638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Although combustible cigarette use is an established risk factor for severe COVID-19 disease, there is conflicting evidence for the association of electronic cigarette use with SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease severity. METHODS Study participants were from the Kaiser Permanente Research Bank (KPRB), a biorepository that includes adult Kaiser Permanente members from across the United States. Starting in April 2020, electronic surveys were sent to KPRB members to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. These surveys collected information on self-report of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-related risk factors, including electronic cigarette and combustible cigarette smoking history. We also used electronic health records data to assess COVID-19 diagnoses, positive PCR lab tests, hospitalizations, and death. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection between individuals by e-cigarette use categories (never, former, and current). Among those with SARS-CoV-2 infection, we used multivariable logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs comparing the odds of hospitalization or death within 30 days of infection between individuals by e-cigarette use categories. RESULTS There were 126,475 individuals who responded to the survey and completed questions on e-cigarette and combustible cigarette use (48% response rate). Among survey respondents, 819 (1%) currently used e-cigarettes, 3,691 (3%) formerly used e-cigarettes, and 121,965 (96%) had never used e-cigarettes. After adjustment for demographic, behavioral, and clinical factors, there was no association with SARS-CoV-2 infection and former e-cigarette use (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.99; CI: 0.83–1.18) or current e-cigarette use (HR = 1.08; CI: 0.76–1.52). Among those with SARS-CoV-2 infection, there was no association with hospitalization or death within 30 days of infection and former e-cigarette use (odds ratio (OR) = 1.19; CI: 0.59–2.43) or current e-cigarette use (OR = 1.02; CI: 0.22–4.74). CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that e-cigarette use is not associated with an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection or severe COVID-19 illness.","PeriodicalId":43361,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Use Insights","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Use Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173x221096638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

BACKGROUND Although combustible cigarette use is an established risk factor for severe COVID-19 disease, there is conflicting evidence for the association of electronic cigarette use with SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease severity. METHODS Study participants were from the Kaiser Permanente Research Bank (KPRB), a biorepository that includes adult Kaiser Permanente members from across the United States. Starting in April 2020, electronic surveys were sent to KPRB members to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. These surveys collected information on self-report of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-related risk factors, including electronic cigarette and combustible cigarette smoking history. We also used electronic health records data to assess COVID-19 diagnoses, positive PCR lab tests, hospitalizations, and death. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection between individuals by e-cigarette use categories (never, former, and current). Among those with SARS-CoV-2 infection, we used multivariable logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs comparing the odds of hospitalization or death within 30 days of infection between individuals by e-cigarette use categories. RESULTS There were 126,475 individuals who responded to the survey and completed questions on e-cigarette and combustible cigarette use (48% response rate). Among survey respondents, 819 (1%) currently used e-cigarettes, 3,691 (3%) formerly used e-cigarettes, and 121,965 (96%) had never used e-cigarettes. After adjustment for demographic, behavioral, and clinical factors, there was no association with SARS-CoV-2 infection and former e-cigarette use (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.99; CI: 0.83–1.18) or current e-cigarette use (HR = 1.08; CI: 0.76–1.52). Among those with SARS-CoV-2 infection, there was no association with hospitalization or death within 30 days of infection and former e-cigarette use (odds ratio (OR) = 1.19; CI: 0.59–2.43) or current e-cigarette use (OR = 1.02; CI: 0.22–4.74). CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that e-cigarette use is not associated with an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection or severe COVID-19 illness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电子烟使用与SARS-CoV-2感染和新冠肺炎疾病严重程度的关系
背景尽管可燃香烟的使用是严重新冠肺炎疾病的一个既定风险因素,但有相互矛盾的证据表明电子香烟的使用与SARS-CoV-2感染和新冠肺炎疾病严重程度有关。方法研究参与者来自Kaiser Permanente研究银行(KPRB),这是一家生物库,包括来自美国各地的Kaiser Perminente成年成员。从2020年4月开始,向KPRB成员发送了电子调查,以评估新冠肺炎大流行的影响。这些调查收集了关于严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型感染的自我报告和新冠肺炎相关风险因素的信息,包括电子烟和可燃烟吸烟史。我们还使用电子健康记录数据评估新冠肺炎诊断、PCR实验室检测阳性、住院和死亡。我们使用多变量Cox比例风险回归来计算调整后的风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI),根据电子烟使用类别(从未、以前和现在)比较个体之间感染严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型的风险。在严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型感染者中,我们使用多变量逻辑回归来估计调整后的比值比(or)和95%置信区间,根据电子烟使用类别比较感染后30天内的住院或死亡几率。结果共有126475人回答了调查,并完成了关于电子烟和可燃香烟使用的问题(48%的回答率)。在调查对象中,819人(1%)目前使用电子烟,3691人(3%)以前使用过电子烟,121965人(96%)从未使用过电子香烟。在对人口统计学、行为学和临床因素进行调整后,与严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型感染和以前使用电子烟无关(危险比(HR)=0.99;CI:0.83-1.18)或当前使用电子烟(HR=1.08;CI:0.76-1.52)。在严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型感染者中,与感染后30天内的住院或死亡以及以前使用电子烟无关(比值比(or)=1.19;CI:0.59–2.43)或当前使用电子烟(or=1.02;CI:0.22–4.74)。结论我们的研究结果表明,使用电子烟与SARS-CoV-2感染或严重新冠肺炎疾病的风险增加无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tobacco Use Insights
Tobacco Use Insights PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
4.50%
发文量
32
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the Digital Landscape of E-Cigarette Marketing in India: Evidence From Mixed Method Study. An Observational Study of Regulatory Violations Related to Online Tobacco Product Marketing and Retailer Responses to US FDA Warning Letters. Social Acceptability and Health Concerns of Smoking and Vaping Among University Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. How Community Health Workers can Address Tobacco Dependence of High-Risk patients: A Qualitative Analysis of the Unique Training Needs of Community Health Workers. Predictors of Successful Tobacco Cessation After Receiving an E-Cigarette Based Smoking Cessation Intervention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1