Debating Abortion and Contraception in Socialist Yugoslavia

Q2 Social Sciences Narodna Umjetnost Pub Date : 2023-06-15 DOI:10.15176/vol60no108
C. Bonfiglioli, Sara Žerić
{"title":"Debating Abortion and Contraception in Socialist Yugoslavia","authors":"C. Bonfiglioli, Sara Žerić","doi":"10.15176/vol60no108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the debates on abortion rights and practices that took place in socialist Yugoslavia. It focuses on the microhistorical case studies of Varaždin and Karlovac, with specific attention given to the period between the first liberalisation of abortion for social reasons in 1960 and the full liberalisation of abortion until 10 weeks in 1969. The primary sources for this article stem from the collections of the Conference for the Social Activity of Women in the Croatian State Archives, as well as periodicals such as Arhiv za zaštitu majke i djeteta issued by the Institute for the Protection of Mother and Child in Zagreb. Digitalised local press sources – Varaždinski vjesnik and Karlovački tjednik – are also explored. As shown in the paper, the liberalisation of abortion in 1960s Yugoslavia generated a wide array of dilemmas for women and practitioners alike. While legal abortions were seen as necessary to curb illegal ones, they were nonetheless perceived by local practitioners as something that should best be prevented and which could prejudice a woman’s reproductive abilities, particularly in the case of first pregnancies. Many women recurred to legal and illegal abortion as a result of the lack in health infrastructure, unavailable contraceptives, difficult social conditions and persisting patriarchal gender norms.","PeriodicalId":38816,"journal":{"name":"Narodna Umjetnost","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Narodna Umjetnost","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15176/vol60no108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article discusses the debates on abortion rights and practices that took place in socialist Yugoslavia. It focuses on the microhistorical case studies of Varaždin and Karlovac, with specific attention given to the period between the first liberalisation of abortion for social reasons in 1960 and the full liberalisation of abortion until 10 weeks in 1969. The primary sources for this article stem from the collections of the Conference for the Social Activity of Women in the Croatian State Archives, as well as periodicals such as Arhiv za zaštitu majke i djeteta issued by the Institute for the Protection of Mother and Child in Zagreb. Digitalised local press sources – Varaždinski vjesnik and Karlovački tjednik – are also explored. As shown in the paper, the liberalisation of abortion in 1960s Yugoslavia generated a wide array of dilemmas for women and practitioners alike. While legal abortions were seen as necessary to curb illegal ones, they were nonetheless perceived by local practitioners as something that should best be prevented and which could prejudice a woman’s reproductive abilities, particularly in the case of first pregnancies. Many women recurred to legal and illegal abortion as a result of the lack in health infrastructure, unavailable contraceptives, difficult social conditions and persisting patriarchal gender norms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会主义南斯拉夫堕胎与避孕之争
本文讨论了社会主义南斯拉夫关于堕胎权和堕胎实践的辩论。它侧重于瓦拉津和卡罗瓦茨的微观历史案例研究,特别关注从1960年出于社会原因首次放开堕胎到1969年10周前全面放开堕胎之间的时期。这篇文章的主要来源于克罗地亚国家档案馆妇女社会活动会议的收藏,以及萨格勒布保护母亲和儿童研究所发行的《Arhiv za zaštitu majke i djeteta》等期刊。还探索了数字化的当地新闻来源——Varaždinski vjesnik和Karlovački tjednik。如论文所示,20世纪60年代南斯拉夫堕胎自由化给妇女和从业者带来了一系列困境。虽然合法堕胎被视为遏制非法堕胎的必要手段,但当地从业者认为,合法堕胎是最好预防的,可能会损害妇女的生殖能力,尤其是在首次怀孕的情况下。由于缺乏卫生基础设施、无法获得避孕药具、社会条件困难以及重男轻女的性别规范,许多妇女再次进行合法和非法堕胎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Narodna Umjetnost
Narodna Umjetnost Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Temporality of Humanitarian Care The Ethnography of Healing and Dying during the Coronavirus Pandemic from the Perspective of Medical Workers in Croatia O radu na Animalističkom leksikonu u okviru projekta Kulturna animalistika O Maji, Jobu i pčelama Zoomorfna obeležja duša pokojnika u verovanjima slovenskih naroda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1