Evaluation of the socioeconomic and environmental sustainability of banking institutions in Brazil using the Analytic Hierarchy Process with ratings approach

Q3 Engineering Gestao e Producao Pub Date : 2021-08-02 DOI:10.1590/1806-9649-2021v28e5407
Igor Laguna Vieira, L. Rangel, E. R. D. Silva, Luiz Carlos de Martini Junior
{"title":"Evaluation of the socioeconomic and environmental sustainability of banking institutions in Brazil using the Analytic Hierarchy Process with ratings approach","authors":"Igor Laguna Vieira, L. Rangel, E. R. D. Silva, Luiz Carlos de Martini Junior","doi":"10.1590/1806-9649-2021v28e5407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Large banking institutions play an important role in sustainable development, especially owing to their size and capillarity. Therefore, the objective of this study is to compare sustainability indicators (economic, environmental, and social) published in the reports of some of these institutions that operate in the Brazilian market. The four banks selected for this study were the ones that published their sustainability reports in the 2017 Global Reporting Initiative standard, and that comprised the portfolio of the Corporate Sustainability Index, promoted by “Brasil, Bolsa e Balcão,” in 2018. These banks were Banco do Brasil, Bradesco, Itaú, and Santander. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) with the use of ratings was used to carry out the research. After elaborating on the hierarchical structure of the problem, specialists, who were researchers in the field of sustainability, were required to weigh the degree of relevance of each of the indicators analyzed in this study. A ranking of the selected banks was then obtained in relation to their sustainability performances, which was based on the weights given to each indicator and the data available in the sustainability reports of each institution investigated. The banks were ranked in the following order: Itaú, Santander, Bradesco, and Banco do Brasil. The results of this study showed that there is room for evolution in relation to sustainability, mainly in the social department, in the banking sector. The AHP method with the use of ratings proved to be efficient, especially because it allowed for the weighing of the evaluation criteria and sub-criteria; this proved the usefulness of the method in comparing companies with regard to their sustainability performance.","PeriodicalId":35415,"journal":{"name":"Gestao e Producao","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gestao e Producao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9649-2021v28e5407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract: Large banking institutions play an important role in sustainable development, especially owing to their size and capillarity. Therefore, the objective of this study is to compare sustainability indicators (economic, environmental, and social) published in the reports of some of these institutions that operate in the Brazilian market. The four banks selected for this study were the ones that published their sustainability reports in the 2017 Global Reporting Initiative standard, and that comprised the portfolio of the Corporate Sustainability Index, promoted by “Brasil, Bolsa e Balcão,” in 2018. These banks were Banco do Brasil, Bradesco, Itaú, and Santander. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) with the use of ratings was used to carry out the research. After elaborating on the hierarchical structure of the problem, specialists, who were researchers in the field of sustainability, were required to weigh the degree of relevance of each of the indicators analyzed in this study. A ranking of the selected banks was then obtained in relation to their sustainability performances, which was based on the weights given to each indicator and the data available in the sustainability reports of each institution investigated. The banks were ranked in the following order: Itaú, Santander, Bradesco, and Banco do Brasil. The results of this study showed that there is room for evolution in relation to sustainability, mainly in the social department, in the banking sector. The AHP method with the use of ratings proved to be efficient, especially because it allowed for the weighing of the evaluation criteria and sub-criteria; this proved the usefulness of the method in comparing companies with regard to their sustainability performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用层次分析法和评级法评估巴西银行机构的社会经济和环境可持续性
摘要:大型银行机构在可持续发展中发挥着重要作用,特别是由于其规模和毛细管作用。因此,本研究的目的是比较在巴西市场运营的一些机构的报告中公布的可持续性指标(经济、环境和社会)。本研究选择的四家银行是在2017年全球报告倡议标准中发布可持续发展报告的银行,它们构成了2018年由“巴西银行”推动的企业可持续发展指数的投资组合。这些银行是巴西银行、Bradesco、Itaú和Santander。采用层次分析法(AHP)结合评分法进行研究。在详细说明了问题的层次结构后,作为可持续性领域研究人员的专家被要求权衡本研究中分析的每个指标的相关性。然后,根据每个指标的权重和所调查的每个机构可持续性报告中的可用数据,获得了选定银行的可持续性表现排名。这些银行按以下顺序排列:Itaú、Santander、Bradesco和Banco do Brasil。这项研究的结果表明,在可持续性方面存在发展空间,主要是在社会部门和银行部门。使用评级的AHP方法被证明是有效的,特别是因为它允许对评估标准和子标准进行权衡;这证明了该方法在比较企业可持续发展绩效方面的有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gestao e Producao
Gestao e Producao Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
44 weeks
期刊介绍: Gestão & Produção is a journal published four times a year year (March, June, September and December) by the Departamento de Engenharia de Produção (DEP) of Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar). The first issue of Gestão & Produção was published in April, 1994. Actually, G&P was result of experience of professors of DEP/UFSCar in editing, in the beginning, "Cadernos DEP" in the 1980s, followed by "Cadernos de Engenharia de Produção". The last three issues of "Cadernos de Engenharia de Produção" were a test previous to the launch of Gestão & Produção because most of the journal characteristics were already established, like regularity.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of artificial neural networks learning methods to evaluate supply chain performance Evaluation of the socioeconomic and environmental sustainability of banking institutions in Brazil using the Analytic Hierarchy Process with ratings approach Economic, social and environmental aspects of the sustainability of a construction waste recycling plant A bibliometric study on the use of games in the Production Engineering area Competences of the Executive Secretariat in project management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1