M. Westphal, Ka Man Lau, Johanna Hartmann, Dagmar Deuber
{"title":"Phonetic variation in Standard English spoken by Trinidadian professionals","authors":"M. Westphal, Ka Man Lau, Johanna Hartmann, Dagmar Deuber","doi":"10.1075/jpcl.00098.wes","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper analyzes the speech of 27 Trinidadian professionals (lawyers, lecturers, and politicians), who are\n typical speakers of Standard Trinidadian English in formal contexts, where traditionally Standard English is targeted. We\n investigate phonetic variation in Trinidadian English speech with regard to the varying integration of Creole features. The paper\n presents the results of an acoustic study of 10 vowels and an auditory analysis of three consonantal variables, using data from\n the Trinidad and Tobago component of the International Corpus of English.\n The analysis shows that exonormative influences do not play a role. Individual Trinidadian Creole features are\n integrated into standard speech (voiced TH-stopping, partial overlap of bath-start-trap, partial overlap of\n strut-lot) and some realizations are identical in both codes (face and goat), while others\n are avoided (voiceless TH-stopping, the realization of down with as a monophthong with a velar nasal, the\n cloth-thought merger, and the realization of mouth as [ɔʊ]). These results from Trinidad confirm\n the validity of Irvine’s (2004, 2008) model\n of load-bearing and non load-bearing variables for the distinction between English and Creole. The conclusion highlights\n methodological differences to Irvine’s study and discusses an extended conceptualization of Standard English that incorporates\n variation along the dimension of exo- versus endonormativity.","PeriodicalId":43608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00098.wes","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper analyzes the speech of 27 Trinidadian professionals (lawyers, lecturers, and politicians), who are
typical speakers of Standard Trinidadian English in formal contexts, where traditionally Standard English is targeted. We
investigate phonetic variation in Trinidadian English speech with regard to the varying integration of Creole features. The paper
presents the results of an acoustic study of 10 vowels and an auditory analysis of three consonantal variables, using data from
the Trinidad and Tobago component of the International Corpus of English.
The analysis shows that exonormative influences do not play a role. Individual Trinidadian Creole features are
integrated into standard speech (voiced TH-stopping, partial overlap of bath-start-trap, partial overlap of
strut-lot) and some realizations are identical in both codes (face and goat), while others
are avoided (voiceless TH-stopping, the realization of down with as a monophthong with a velar nasal, the
cloth-thought merger, and the realization of mouth as [ɔʊ]). These results from Trinidad confirm
the validity of Irvine’s (2004, 2008) model
of load-bearing and non load-bearing variables for the distinction between English and Creole. The conclusion highlights
methodological differences to Irvine’s study and discusses an extended conceptualization of Standard English that incorporates
variation along the dimension of exo- versus endonormativity.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages (JPCL) aims to provide a forum for the scholarly study of pidgins, creoles, and other contact language varieties, from multi-disciplinary perspectives. The journal places special emphasis on current research devoted to empirical description, theoretical issues, and the broader implications of the study of contact languages for theories of language acquisition and change, and for linguistic theory in general. The editors also encourage contributions that explore the application of linguistic research to language planning, education, and social reform, as well as studies that examine the role of contact languages in the social life and culture, including the literature, of their communities.