International comparisons of COVID-19 pandemic management: What can be learned from activity analysis techniques?

IF 6.7 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Omega-international Journal of Management Science Pub Date : 2023-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.omega.2023.102966
Víctor Giménez , Diego Prior , Claudio Thieme , Emili Tortosa-Ausina
{"title":"International comparisons of COVID-19 pandemic management: What can be learned from activity analysis techniques?","authors":"Víctor Giménez ,&nbsp;Diego Prior ,&nbsp;Claudio Thieme ,&nbsp;Emili Tortosa-Ausina","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2023.102966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The global spread of COVID-19 since early 2020 has resulted in significant humanitarian costs. The pandemic has affected most countries to varying degrees, and governments have implemented diverse policies to minimise the impact on public health. However, these policies have varied across regions and even within countries. This study proposes a nonparametric activity analysis methodology to assess how different countries have managed the pandemic. Specifically, we assess the effectiveness of 61 countries nine months into the pandemic using a robust directional Benefit of Doubt (BoD) model according to expert opinion and conditional on country contextual factors. We then estimate the marginal impact of structural and discretionary contextual variables on effectiveness using nonparametric regression analysis, which shows that effectiveness is strongly influenced by socioeconomic and cultural factors. The results reveal three main groups of countries according to their level of effectiveness in pandemic management, suggesting that an accurate assessment of countries’ management of the pandemic benefits greatly from operations research methods, as we obtain benchmarks and find out how these benchmarks (or best practices) vary when contextual factors are included in the analysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 102966"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048323001305","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global spread of COVID-19 since early 2020 has resulted in significant humanitarian costs. The pandemic has affected most countries to varying degrees, and governments have implemented diverse policies to minimise the impact on public health. However, these policies have varied across regions and even within countries. This study proposes a nonparametric activity analysis methodology to assess how different countries have managed the pandemic. Specifically, we assess the effectiveness of 61 countries nine months into the pandemic using a robust directional Benefit of Doubt (BoD) model according to expert opinion and conditional on country contextual factors. We then estimate the marginal impact of structural and discretionary contextual variables on effectiveness using nonparametric regression analysis, which shows that effectiveness is strongly influenced by socioeconomic and cultural factors. The results reveal three main groups of countries according to their level of effectiveness in pandemic management, suggesting that an accurate assessment of countries’ management of the pandemic benefits greatly from operations research methods, as we obtain benchmarks and find out how these benchmarks (or best practices) vary when contextual factors are included in the analysis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎大流行管理的国际比较:可以从活动分析技术中学到什么?
自2020年初以来,新冠肺炎在全球蔓延,造成了巨大的人道主义代价。疫情在不同程度上影响了大多数国家,各国政府实施了多种政策,以尽量减少对公共卫生的影响。然而,这些政策因地区而异,甚至在国家内部也是如此。这项研究提出了一种非参数活动分析方法,以评估不同国家如何应对疫情。具体而言,我们根据专家意见,并以国家背景因素为条件,使用稳健的定向怀疑效益(BoD)模型,评估了61个国家在疫情爆发9个月后的有效性。然后,我们使用非参数回归分析估计了结构和自由裁量情境变量对有效性的边际影响,这表明有效性受到社会经济和文化因素的强烈影响。研究结果根据国家在疫情管理方面的有效性水平揭示了三组主要国家,这表明,对各国疫情管理的准确评估极大地受益于运筹学方法,因为我们获得了基准,并了解了当分析中包括背景因素时,这些基准(或最佳实践)是如何变化的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Omega-international Journal of Management Science
Omega-international Journal of Management Science 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
11.60%
发文量
130
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.
期刊最新文献
Levying carbon tariffs considering foreign competition and technology choice Paying social costs to gain discounts: Is it beneficial for you? Lean operations and firm resilience - contrasting effects of COVID-19 and economic recession Editorial Board When and how to introduce live streaming for video game? Consumers’ trade-off between buying and watching
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1