Olfactory Function and Age: a Sniffin’ Sticks Extended Test Study Performed in Sardinia

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 Neuroscience Chemosensory Perception Pub Date : 2017-08-29 DOI:10.1007/s12078-017-9233-7
Carla Masala, Luca Saba, Maria Paola Cecchini, Paolo Solla, Francesco Loy
{"title":"Olfactory Function and Age: a Sniffin’ Sticks Extended Test Study Performed in Sardinia","authors":"Carla Masala,&nbsp;Luca Saba,&nbsp;Maria Paola Cecchini,&nbsp;Paolo Solla,&nbsp;Francesco Loy","doi":"10.1007/s12078-017-9233-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Several studies evaluated the influence of cultural components on the Sniffin’ Sticks Identification Test in different countries. The aim of this study was to analyze the olfactory function in a large sample of healthy subjects living in Sardinia, an island known for its historic genetic isolation, in relation to different age ranges to provide new data in healthy Sardinian subjects.</p><p>Olfactory perception of 161 participants (108 females and 53 males; age range 19–78?years) was assessed through three different parameters: odor detection threshold, discrimination, and identification by means of the Sniffin’Sticks Extended test (SST).</p><p>Our results show that young adults were generally normosmic, while in subjects over 55, a statistically significant age-related decrease of all the parameters was observed. Regarding odor identification task, a few, such as leather, apples, lemons, cloves, and pineapples, were frequently incorrectly identified by participants probably due to the similarities between the odors and distractors.</p><p>Our data provide a comprehensive evaluation of the three olfactory components in the Sardinian population and confirm a decrease in the odor detection threshold, discrimination and identification as well as in the global TDI score in subjects over 55?years of age. These results may be useful in providing normative values for routine clinical use of the SSET in Sardinian subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":516,"journal":{"name":"Chemosensory Perception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s12078-017-9233-7","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemosensory Perception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12078-017-9233-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Several studies evaluated the influence of cultural components on the Sniffin’ Sticks Identification Test in different countries. The aim of this study was to analyze the olfactory function in a large sample of healthy subjects living in Sardinia, an island known for its historic genetic isolation, in relation to different age ranges to provide new data in healthy Sardinian subjects.

Olfactory perception of 161 participants (108 females and 53 males; age range 19–78?years) was assessed through three different parameters: odor detection threshold, discrimination, and identification by means of the Sniffin’Sticks Extended test (SST).

Our results show that young adults were generally normosmic, while in subjects over 55, a statistically significant age-related decrease of all the parameters was observed. Regarding odor identification task, a few, such as leather, apples, lemons, cloves, and pineapples, were frequently incorrectly identified by participants probably due to the similarities between the odors and distractors.

Our data provide a comprehensive evaluation of the three olfactory components in the Sardinian population and confirm a decrease in the odor detection threshold, discrimination and identification as well as in the global TDI score in subjects over 55?years of age. These results may be useful in providing normative values for routine clinical use of the SSET in Sardinian subjects.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
嗅觉功能和年龄:在撒丁岛进行的嗅探棒扩展测试研究
一些研究评估了文化因素对不同国家嗅棒识别测试的影响。本研究的目的是分析生活在撒丁岛(一个以其历史上的遗传隔离而闻名的岛屿)的大量健康受试者的嗅觉功能样本与不同年龄范围的关系,以提供撒丁岛健康受试者的新数据。161名参与者(女性108人,男性53人)的嗅觉知觉;年龄范围19-78岁)通过三个不同的参数进行评估:气味检测阈值、辨别和通过嗅探棒扩展试验(SST)识别。我们的研究结果显示,年轻人通常是正常的,而在55岁以上的受试者中,所有参数都有统计学上显著的年龄相关下降。在气味识别任务中,皮革、苹果、柠檬、丁香和菠萝等少数气味经常被参与者错误识别,这可能是由于气味和干扰物之间的相似性。我们的数据对撒丁岛人口的三种嗅觉成分进行了全面评估,并证实了55岁以上受试者的气味检测阈值、歧视和识别以及全球TDI评分的下降。年龄。这些结果可能有助于为撒丁岛受试者的常规临床使用SSET提供规范性值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chemosensory Perception
Chemosensory Perception 农林科学-神经科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Coverage in Chemosensory Perception includes animal work with implications for human phenomena and explores the following areas: Identification of chemicals producing sensory response; Identification of sensory response associated with chemicals; Human in vivo response to chemical stimuli; Human in vitro response to chemical stimuli; Neuroimaging of chemosensory function; Neurological processing of chemoreception; Chemoreception mechanisms; Psychophysics of chemoperception; Trigeminal function; Multisensory perception; Contextual effect on chemoperception; Behavioral response to chemical stimuli; Physiological factors affecting and contributing to chemoperception; Flavor and hedonics; Memory and chemoperception.
期刊最新文献
Odor identification testing is inferior compared to neurocognitive testing in predicting conversion to Alzheimer's Disease Children’s Personal Significance of Olfaction — the ChiPSO Questionnaire Subjective Mouthfeel and Temperature Alterations in COVID-19 Patients Six to Ten Months After Diagnosis A Pilot Study of Self-Rated and Psychophysical Olfactory Dysfunction in Men Living with HIV Effects of Gender and Age on Self-reported Odor Imagery Ability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1