The Laser Safety Officer – Current and future regulations in Germany

Hans-Dieter Reidenbach
{"title":"The Laser Safety Officer – Current and future regulations in Germany","authors":"Hans-Dieter Reidenbach","doi":"10.1016/j.mla.2010.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>One of the main objects of the international standard IEC 60825-1 is to protect persons from laser radiation. In addition to engineering measures, the appointment of a Laser Safety Officer (LSO) is certainly one of the most important administrative measures as far as the safe use of lasers is concerned. It should be the Laser Safety Officer's duties to review several protective measures and designate the appropriate controls to be implemented.</p><p>Due to the associated increased risk, the LSO is recommended for operation of laser class 3B and 4 in most national regulations. In Germany the accident insurance regulations take precedence over recommendations in a technical standard, and the duties of an LSO have been mandatorily fixed for many years.</p><p>In principle the appointment of an LSO and his/her respective duties and responsibilities are a matter for national regulations and might therefore differ from country to country, being in some cases either more or less. Therefore, the Artificial Optical Radiation Directive 2006/25/EC will alter the current situation in the near future due to the fact that this directive has to be transposed into the national regulations of all 27 member states of the European Union. It will take into account the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers. Since the LSO is not even mentioned in the directive, the laser community has been worried that the approved functions of an LSO might be lost.</p><p>This fear seems to have been groundless especially in Germany, since the current draft of an ordinance on optical radiation at the workplace specifies the need for an LSO. The area of responsibility shall include, in addition to laser class 3B and 4, all other optical radiation sources with comparable hazard potential but because the respective duties are not yet clearly defined, there are somewhat conflicting opinions.</p><p>In the discussion, it is mainly the required degree of competence or expertise and the modalities of qualification and certification that are the points of concern. This is especially noteworthy because of the long-standing accident prevention regulations and evidently different views between the accident insurance and the Federal Ministry. In addition to the description of the various strategies, the pros and cons are critically described and challenged in order to preserve the existing high level of safety which is connected with the appointment of an LSO.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88584,"journal":{"name":"Medical laser application : international journal for laser treatment and research","volume":"25 2","pages":"Pages 75-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mla.2010.01.003","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical laser application : international journal for laser treatment and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1615161510000190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

One of the main objects of the international standard IEC 60825-1 is to protect persons from laser radiation. In addition to engineering measures, the appointment of a Laser Safety Officer (LSO) is certainly one of the most important administrative measures as far as the safe use of lasers is concerned. It should be the Laser Safety Officer's duties to review several protective measures and designate the appropriate controls to be implemented.

Due to the associated increased risk, the LSO is recommended for operation of laser class 3B and 4 in most national regulations. In Germany the accident insurance regulations take precedence over recommendations in a technical standard, and the duties of an LSO have been mandatorily fixed for many years.

In principle the appointment of an LSO and his/her respective duties and responsibilities are a matter for national regulations and might therefore differ from country to country, being in some cases either more or less. Therefore, the Artificial Optical Radiation Directive 2006/25/EC will alter the current situation in the near future due to the fact that this directive has to be transposed into the national regulations of all 27 member states of the European Union. It will take into account the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers. Since the LSO is not even mentioned in the directive, the laser community has been worried that the approved functions of an LSO might be lost.

This fear seems to have been groundless especially in Germany, since the current draft of an ordinance on optical radiation at the workplace specifies the need for an LSO. The area of responsibility shall include, in addition to laser class 3B and 4, all other optical radiation sources with comparable hazard potential but because the respective duties are not yet clearly defined, there are somewhat conflicting opinions.

In the discussion, it is mainly the required degree of competence or expertise and the modalities of qualification and certification that are the points of concern. This is especially noteworthy because of the long-standing accident prevention regulations and evidently different views between the accident insurance and the Federal Ministry. In addition to the description of the various strategies, the pros and cons are critically described and challenged in order to preserve the existing high level of safety which is connected with the appointment of an LSO.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
激光安全官员-德国当前和未来的法规
国际标准IEC 60825-1的主要目标之一是保护人们免受激光辐射。除了工程措施外,任命激光安全官员(LSO)当然是最重要的行政措施之一,就激光的安全使用而言。激光安全员的职责应该是审查几种保护措施并指定要实施的适当控制措施。由于相关的风险增加,在大多数国家法规中,建议在操作3B和4级激光器时使用LSO。在德国,意外保险条例优先于技术标准中的建议,并且LSO的职责多年来一直是强制性规定的。原则上,特别干事的任命和他/她各自的职责和责任是国家条例的问题,因此可能因国而异,在某些情况下或多或少。因此,人工光辐射指令2006/25/EC将在不久的将来改变现状,因为该指令必须转换为欧盟所有27个成员国的国家法规。它将考虑到有关工人接触的最低健康和安全要求。由于指令中甚至没有提到LSO,激光界一直担心LSO的批准功能可能会丢失。这种担心似乎是毫无根据的,特别是在德国,因为目前关于工作场所光辐射的条例草案明确规定了LSO的必要性。除3B级和4级激光器外,职责范围还应包括所有其他具有类似危险潜力的光辐射源,但由于各自的职责尚未明确界定,因此存在一些相互矛盾的意见。在讨论中,主要关注的问题是所需的能力或专门知识程度以及资格和认证的方式。这一点尤其值得注意,因为长期存在的事故预防条例和事故保险与联邦部门之间明显不同的观点。除了对各种战略的描述之外,还对利弊进行了批判性的描述和质疑,以保持与任命一名辅助服务人员有关的现有高水平的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Coping Long Term with Active Suicide Program: Description and Pilot Data. Editorial Board Investigation of lipid bodies in a colon carcinoma cell line by confocal Raman microscopy Wide-field, high-resolution two-photon tissue mapping of human skin ex vivo Inactivation of bacteria by high-power 940 nm laser irradiation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1