Effects of the use of fiscal policy of incentive to innovation in performance of brazilian companies

Q3 Engineering Gestao e Producao Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0104-530x3832-20
Itzhak David Simão Kaveski, I. F. Lopes, I. Beuren
{"title":"Effects of the use of fiscal policy of incentive to innovation in performance of brazilian companies","authors":"Itzhak David Simão Kaveski, I. F. Lopes, I. Beuren","doi":"10.1590/0104-530x3832-20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The literature has some empirical evidence of the effects of fiscal incentives to increase private investment in innovation. Thus, this study aims to analyze the effects of the use of fiscal policy of incentive to innovation in performance of Brazilian companies listed on the Brasil Bolsa Balcão (B3). The research population comprised 494 companies and the sample was different for each performance variable, alternating between 221 and 251 companies. The accounting and market values of the period from 2006 to 2014 were used as performance parameters of the companies, and the use of fiscal policy of incentive to innovation was operationalized with a dummy variable. The data were analyzed by means of logistic regression. The results related to the accounting indicators show that the ROA, ROCE and ROE are positively and significantly related to the Innovation Incentive Tax Policy. While these measures may encourage companies to increase investments in Research, Development & Innovation (RD&I), they create distortions between companies and sectors because of the effects of these unsubsidized measures. As for the results related to market indicators no significant relationships were found. These results show that government actions and the posture of companies to make their RD&I practices less costly are still not captured by the market. It is concluded that the use of fiscal policy of incentive to innovation is reflected in the performance of the companies surveyed in the analyzed period, which is partly explained by the fact that they are allowed to deduct investments in RD&I in the tax base.","PeriodicalId":35415,"journal":{"name":"Gestao e Producao","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gestao e Producao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530x3832-20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The literature has some empirical evidence of the effects of fiscal incentives to increase private investment in innovation. Thus, this study aims to analyze the effects of the use of fiscal policy of incentive to innovation in performance of Brazilian companies listed on the Brasil Bolsa Balcão (B3). The research population comprised 494 companies and the sample was different for each performance variable, alternating between 221 and 251 companies. The accounting and market values of the period from 2006 to 2014 were used as performance parameters of the companies, and the use of fiscal policy of incentive to innovation was operationalized with a dummy variable. The data were analyzed by means of logistic regression. The results related to the accounting indicators show that the ROA, ROCE and ROE are positively and significantly related to the Innovation Incentive Tax Policy. While these measures may encourage companies to increase investments in Research, Development & Innovation (RD&I), they create distortions between companies and sectors because of the effects of these unsubsidized measures. As for the results related to market indicators no significant relationships were found. These results show that government actions and the posture of companies to make their RD&I practices less costly are still not captured by the market. It is concluded that the use of fiscal policy of incentive to innovation is reflected in the performance of the companies surveyed in the analyzed period, which is partly explained by the fact that they are allowed to deduct investments in RD&I in the tax base.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
财政激励政策对巴西企业创新绩效的影响
文献中有一些实证证据表明财政激励对增加私人创新投资的影响。因此,本研究旨在分析在巴西证券交易所上市的巴西公司(B3)使用财政激励政策对创新绩效的影响。研究对象包括494家公司,每个绩效变量的样本都不同,在221到251家公司之间交替。采用2006 - 2014年会计价值和市场价值作为企业绩效参数,采用虚拟变量对财政创新激励政策的运用进行操作。采用logistic回归方法对数据进行分析。与会计指标相关的结果表明,ROA、ROCE和ROE与创新激励税收政策正相关且显著。虽然这些措施可能会鼓励公司增加对研发和创新(RD&I)的投资,但由于这些无补贴措施的影响,它们在公司和部门之间造成了扭曲。与市场指标相关的结果没有发现显著的关系。这些结果表明,市场仍然没有捕捉到政府的行动和公司降低研发和创新实践成本的姿态。研究发现,激励创新的财政政策的使用反映在被调查公司在分析期间的绩效中,部分原因是它们被允许在税基中扣除在研发和创新方面的投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gestao e Producao
Gestao e Producao Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
44 weeks
期刊介绍: Gestão & Produção is a journal published four times a year year (March, June, September and December) by the Departamento de Engenharia de Produção (DEP) of Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar). The first issue of Gestão & Produção was published in April, 1994. Actually, G&P was result of experience of professors of DEP/UFSCar in editing, in the beginning, "Cadernos DEP" in the 1980s, followed by "Cadernos de Engenharia de Produção". The last three issues of "Cadernos de Engenharia de Produção" were a test previous to the launch of Gestão & Produção because most of the journal characteristics were already established, like regularity.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of artificial neural networks learning methods to evaluate supply chain performance Evaluation of the socioeconomic and environmental sustainability of banking institutions in Brazil using the Analytic Hierarchy Process with ratings approach Economic, social and environmental aspects of the sustainability of a construction waste recycling plant A bibliometric study on the use of games in the Production Engineering area Competences of the Executive Secretariat in project management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1