Indigenous Knowledge Systems Discourse and Inclusionality: An Afro-Centric Quest for Recognition in a Globalised World

Munyaradzi Felix Murove
{"title":"Indigenous Knowledge Systems Discourse and Inclusionality: An Afro-Centric Quest for Recognition in a Globalised World","authors":"Munyaradzi Felix Murove","doi":"10.17159/2413-3027/2018/V31N1A9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main goal of this essay is to argue that in a multicultural and globalised world, the indigenisation of knowledge production has to be pursued in a way that demonstrates an element of inclusivity. To achieve this goal this article’s structure has three foci. Firstly , it is argued that the indigenisation of knowledge must be pursued under the presumption of a recognition that all knowledge is cultural or context specific to some degree. As such, the multicultural nature and plurality of knowledge systems formations should be acknowledged, as well as the fact that all knowledge production includes an aspect of the indigenisation of knowledge. Secondly , against this broader background, the argument for the indigenisation of knowledge in Africa goes hand-in-hand with the promotion of the intellectualisation of knowledge that is often regarded by Western scholarship as ‘primitive’, and thus redundant, in the face of modernity. This, however, is not only a universal for the production of all knowledge(s), but also foundational to all knowledge development, and should be recognised as such. Finally , given the plurality of knowledge formations, and the African celebration and development of its own knowledge formations, the quest for the indigenisation and intellectualisation of knowledge in African context, should be seen as a quest for the inclusionary appreciation of a multiplicity of global knowledges, whereby all knowledge is understood as context specific to some degree, and contributing to both local and general human wellbeing. This latter perspective implies a deliberately ethical stance, to the effect that in a globalised and multicultural world, no  knowledge system should be privileged as superior to any other knowledge system, and none, regarded as inferior. Keywords: Indigenisation, knowledge, ethnicity, recognition, Africa, ethics, context, anthropology, recognition, multiculturalism, globalisation, inclusionnality","PeriodicalId":42808,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Study of Religion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the Study of Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3027/2018/V31N1A9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The main goal of this essay is to argue that in a multicultural and globalised world, the indigenisation of knowledge production has to be pursued in a way that demonstrates an element of inclusivity. To achieve this goal this article’s structure has three foci. Firstly , it is argued that the indigenisation of knowledge must be pursued under the presumption of a recognition that all knowledge is cultural or context specific to some degree. As such, the multicultural nature and plurality of knowledge systems formations should be acknowledged, as well as the fact that all knowledge production includes an aspect of the indigenisation of knowledge. Secondly , against this broader background, the argument for the indigenisation of knowledge in Africa goes hand-in-hand with the promotion of the intellectualisation of knowledge that is often regarded by Western scholarship as ‘primitive’, and thus redundant, in the face of modernity. This, however, is not only a universal for the production of all knowledge(s), but also foundational to all knowledge development, and should be recognised as such. Finally , given the plurality of knowledge formations, and the African celebration and development of its own knowledge formations, the quest for the indigenisation and intellectualisation of knowledge in African context, should be seen as a quest for the inclusionary appreciation of a multiplicity of global knowledges, whereby all knowledge is understood as context specific to some degree, and contributing to both local and general human wellbeing. This latter perspective implies a deliberately ethical stance, to the effect that in a globalised and multicultural world, no  knowledge system should be privileged as superior to any other knowledge system, and none, regarded as inferior. Keywords: Indigenisation, knowledge, ethnicity, recognition, Africa, ethics, context, anthropology, recognition, multiculturalism, globalisation, inclusionnality
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本土知识系统、话语和包容性:在全球化世界中以非洲为中心寻求认可
本文的主要目的是论证在一个多元文化和全球化的世界中,知识生产的本土化必须以一种展示包容性元素的方式进行。为了实现这一目标,本文的结构有三个重点。首先,有人认为,知识的本土化必须在承认所有知识在某种程度上都是文化或特定背景的假设下进行。因此,应该承认知识系统形成的多元文化性质和多元性,以及所有知识生产都包含知识本土化这一事实。其次,在这个更广泛的背景下,非洲知识本土化的论点与知识智能化的促进密切相关,而知识智能化通常被西方学者视为“原始的”,因此在现代性面前是多余的。然而,这不仅是所有知识生产的普遍性,而且是所有知识发展的基础,应该被视为如此。最后,鉴于知识形成的多元性,以及非洲对自身知识形成的庆祝和发展,在非洲背景下对知识本土化和知识化的追求,应被视为对全球知识多样性的包容性欣赏的追求,由此,所有知识在某种程度上都被理解为特定于环境的知识,并为当地和一般人类福祉做出贡献。后一种观点暗示了一种刻意的伦理立场,其效果是,在全球化和多元文化的世界中,没有任何知识体系应该被特权为优于任何其他知识体系,也没有任何知识体系被视为劣等。关键词:本土化,知识,种族,认同,非洲,伦理,语境,人类学,认同,多元文化,全球化,包容性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Planting Islam in Ghana: A Critical Review of the Approaches Religion and Migration in Iraq: Investigating the Reasons for Return of Internally Displaced Christians to Baghdeda The Catholic Church's Dialogical Method and Engagement with the Zimbabwean State between 2000 and 2010 Life Trajectories in the Language Games of Islamic Reform and Pentecostalism in Cape Town Problematizing Confession and Forgiveness in Prophetic Pentecostal Christianity: A Case Study of Rabboni Centre Ministries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1