“I am a Rusin, I am a Hutsul…”: Ethnoimagological dominants of Yuriy Fedkovych’s vision

IF 0.3 Q2 HISTORY Rusin Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.17223/18572685/63/12
L. Kovalets, M. Lanovyk, Z. Lanovyk
{"title":"“I am a Rusin, I am a Hutsul…”: Ethnoimagological dominants of Yuriy Fedkovych’s vision","authors":"L. Kovalets, M. Lanovyk, Z. Lanovyk","doi":"10.17223/18572685/63/12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines how images of other nations are formed in the artistic world of a writer – a representative of another nation. Employing the imagological approach with its tools for studying the ethnic structures of the text and drawing on E. Smith’s concept of the national identity and E. Levinas’s concept of the Other, the author analysies the problem of perception of the Other on the interpersonal and intercultural levels, using the artistic heritage of the Ukrainian Rusin writer Yu. Fedkovych as a case study. The article highlights the dominants in the representation of other ethnic groups in the context of the writer’s identity, taking into consideration the cultural and historical discourses of the literature of a particular nation. Born into an interethnic family in Bukovynian Hutsulia, which was part of multicultural Austria, working and doing military service in various territories of Europe, communicating with representatives of various ethnic groups, Y. Fedkovich recorded the main stereotypes in perception of other nations’ representatives, which reveal the specificity of European interethnic relations. The main attention is drawn to the analysis of the Hutsul image of the world and the dominant images of the Other (Italian, Austrian, German, Moldavian / Romanian, Serbian, Polish, Jewish, Gypsy Imago). According to Levinas, the factors that determine the image of the Other are situations of freedom / enslavement, reinforced by the experience of war. Theoretical considerations are confirmed by examples from creative works. In this perspective, the literature represents intercultural dialogue in the European space to become a source of ethnoimagological studies.","PeriodicalId":54120,"journal":{"name":"Rusin","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rusin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/18572685/63/12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article examines how images of other nations are formed in the artistic world of a writer – a representative of another nation. Employing the imagological approach with its tools for studying the ethnic structures of the text and drawing on E. Smith’s concept of the national identity and E. Levinas’s concept of the Other, the author analysies the problem of perception of the Other on the interpersonal and intercultural levels, using the artistic heritage of the Ukrainian Rusin writer Yu. Fedkovych as a case study. The article highlights the dominants in the representation of other ethnic groups in the context of the writer’s identity, taking into consideration the cultural and historical discourses of the literature of a particular nation. Born into an interethnic family in Bukovynian Hutsulia, which was part of multicultural Austria, working and doing military service in various territories of Europe, communicating with representatives of various ethnic groups, Y. Fedkovich recorded the main stereotypes in perception of other nations’ representatives, which reveal the specificity of European interethnic relations. The main attention is drawn to the analysis of the Hutsul image of the world and the dominant images of the Other (Italian, Austrian, German, Moldavian / Romanian, Serbian, Polish, Jewish, Gypsy Imago). According to Levinas, the factors that determine the image of the Other are situations of freedom / enslavement, reinforced by the experience of war. Theoretical considerations are confirmed by examples from creative works. In this perspective, the literature represents intercultural dialogue in the European space to become a source of ethnoimagological studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我是俄罗斯人,我是胡特苏尔人……”:尤里·费德科维奇的民族意象学优势
本文考察了作为另一个民族的代表的作家的艺术世界中,其他民族的形象是如何形成的。作者运用意象学方法及其研究文本族群结构的工具,借鉴史密斯的民族认同观和列维纳斯的他者观,从人际和跨文化层面分析了他者的感知问题,并借鉴了乌克兰俄国作家于的艺术遗产。费德科维奇是一个案例研究。本文结合特定民族文学的文化和历史话语,在作者身份的语境中突出了其他民族的表现优势。Y. Fedkovich出生在bukovyian Hutsulia的一个跨种族家庭,该家庭是多元文化奥地利的一部分,在欧洲各领土工作和服兵役,与各种族的代表交流,记录了对其他国家代表的主要刻板印象,这揭示了欧洲种族间关系的特殊性。主要的注意力集中在分析胡索尔人的世界形象和他者的主要形象(意大利人、奥地利人、德国人、摩尔多瓦人/罗马尼亚人、塞尔维亚人、波兰人、犹太人、吉普赛意象)。根据列维纳斯的观点,决定他者形象的因素是自由/奴役的处境,而战争的经历又强化了这一点。理论考虑被创造性作品的例子所证实。从这个角度来看,文学代表了欧洲空间的跨文化对话,成为民族意象学研究的来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rusin
Rusin HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
75.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vitaliy (Maksimenko) and his efforts to create the Pochaiv Bank Elections to the Ukrainian Constituent Assembly (December 1917 - January 1918): campaign progress, lists of candidates, and voting results by districts The church underground in Moldova in 1944-1964: emergence, shapes, participants The Hutsul Springtime of Nations by Kajetan Abgarowicz: the discourse of the borderland as a state of culture awareness The dialect basis of Mykhailo Atamanyuk’s translation of the German-language Ein Kampf um’s Recht by K.E. Franzos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1