Konstantin Yakovlevich Grot (June 22 (July 4), 1853 - September 29,1934) was a Russian Slavist and archivist, the son to Academician Yakov Grot and the brother to the philosopher Nikolai Grot, a corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, one of the founders of the Russian Assembly. Grot graduated from the Faculty of History and Philology of St. Petersburg Imperial University, where he was a student of V.I. Lamansky. As a student, he was awarded a golden medal for The Analysis of the Testimonies of Konstantin Porphyrogenitus About the Southern Slavs. Grot received his Masters degree for his thesis Moravia and the Magyars from the Half of the 9th to the Early 10th Centuries (1881). In 1883, he became professor at the Department of Slavic Studies at the Imperial University of Warsaw. In 1889, Grot defended his doctoral dissertation From the History of Ugria and Slavs in the Twelfth Century (1889). In 1894, after the of Yakov Grot, Emperor Alexander III entrusted Konstantin Grot with the publication of his father's works and literary correspondence. In 1899, Grot moved to St. Petersburg, where in 1905 he was appointed head of the Public Archives of the Ministry of the Imperial Court. In 1905, in the New Collection of Articles on Slavic Studies by Lamansky, Grot published his article “Carpathian-Danubian lands in the fate of the Slavs and in Russian historical studies.” This essay later became the basis of the monograph Austria-Hungary, or the Carpatho-Danubian Lands in the Fates of the Slavs and in Russian Historical Studies, published and republished several times in 1914. In 1907, he edited the monograph Galician Rus Before and Now. Historical Essay and an Eyewitness's Look at the Current State. In 1914, Grot wrote the pamphlet “The Great War and the Carpatho-Danubian Monarchy (On the Coverage of Issues of the Near Future)” He also authored studies on famous Slavists: A. Budilovich, P. Kulakovsky, M. Lavrovsky, V. Lamansky, J. Pervolf, I. Filevich, and others. After the October Revolution, he was the administrator of the Archive. From April 1925 to November 1929, Grot worked as a researcher at the Pushkin House (over staff).
{"title":"K.Ya. Grot and Carpatho-Danubian Lands","authors":"S. Sulyak","doi":"10.17223/18572685/67/9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17223/18572685/67/9","url":null,"abstract":"Konstantin Yakovlevich Grot (June 22 (July 4), 1853 - September 29,1934) was a Russian Slavist and archivist, the son to Academician Yakov Grot and the brother to the philosopher Nikolai Grot, a corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, one of the founders of the Russian Assembly. Grot graduated from the Faculty of History and Philology of St. Petersburg Imperial University, where he was a student of V.I. Lamansky. As a student, he was awarded a golden medal for The Analysis of the Testimonies of Konstantin Porphyrogenitus About the Southern Slavs. Grot received his Masters degree for his thesis Moravia and the Magyars from the Half of the 9th to the Early 10th Centuries (1881). In 1883, he became professor at the Department of Slavic Studies at the Imperial University of Warsaw. In 1889, Grot defended his doctoral dissertation From the History of Ugria and Slavs in the Twelfth Century (1889). In 1894, after the of Yakov Grot, Emperor Alexander III entrusted Konstantin Grot with the publication of his father's works and literary correspondence. In 1899, Grot moved to St. Petersburg, where in 1905 he was appointed head of the Public Archives of the Ministry of the Imperial Court. In 1905, in the New Collection of Articles on Slavic Studies by Lamansky, Grot published his article “Carpathian-Danubian lands in the fate of the Slavs and in Russian historical studies.” This essay later became the basis of the monograph Austria-Hungary, or the Carpatho-Danubian Lands in the Fates of the Slavs and in Russian Historical Studies, published and republished several times in 1914. In 1907, he edited the monograph Galician Rus Before and Now. Historical Essay and an Eyewitness's Look at the Current State. In 1914, Grot wrote the pamphlet “The Great War and the Carpatho-Danubian Monarchy (On the Coverage of Issues of the Near Future)” He also authored studies on famous Slavists: A. Budilovich, P. Kulakovsky, M. Lavrovsky, V. Lamansky, J. Pervolf, I. Filevich, and others. After the October Revolution, he was the administrator of the Archive. From April 1925 to November 1929, Grot worked as a researcher at the Pushkin House (over staff).","PeriodicalId":54120,"journal":{"name":"Rusin","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67581416","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The article focuses on the political and party representation of the Rusin leaders in Transcarpathia (Ukraine) who particiapted in the local elections of 2020. The analysis is based on the electoral statistics and interviews with participants in the election campaign. According to the author, the Rusin leaders are heads and activists of national cultural associations and opinion leaders who do not represent ethno-cultural associations, but are widely known in Transcarpathia. The author argues that the new electoral system of “semi-open” party lists has resulted in the failure of local elections for all candidates representing the Rusin community. However, the electoral statistics shows that Rusin leaders actually received: 1) more votes than their opponents on the political party lists (Vladimir Fenych, Vasilij Sich, Nikolai Rishko); 2) the same number of votes (Svyatoslav Gal); 3) the required 25 % of the votes from the electoral quota (Yurij Shypovych). Most of the Rusin candidates ran for the political forces “For the Future” (7 persons) and “Opposition Platform - For Life” (5 persons). Their dominance can be explained by identifying candidates with the oppositional rhetoric of these parties, as well as their proximity to regional party leaders who sympathize with the Rusin public movement and identify themselves as Rusins. One of the representatives of Rusin community ran for the party of power “Servant of the People” (Svyatoslav Gal), one (Nikolaj Rishko) - for “The Team of Andrej Baloga” Candidates Ivan Danatsko, Ivan Palinkash, and Ivan Bushko, as self-nominated candidates, distanced themselves from political parties.
本文重点关注俄罗斯领导人在乌克兰外喀尔巴阡参加2020年地方选举的政治和政党代表。该分析是基于选举统计数据和对竞选活动参与者的采访。据发件人说，Rusin领导人是全国文化协会的负责人和积极分子，以及不代表民族文化协会的意见领袖，但在外喀尔巴阡广为人知。发件人认为，“半公开”政党名单的新选举制度导致代表Rusin社区的所有候选人都未能参加地方选举。然而，选举统计数据显示，俄罗斯领导人实际上获得了:1)在政党名单上比他们的对手(弗拉基米尔·费内奇、瓦西里·西奇、尼古拉·里什科)更多的选票;2)相同票数(Svyatoslav Gal);3)从选举配额中获得所需的25%的选票(yuri Shypovych)。大多数俄罗斯党候选人参选的政党是“为了未来”(7人)和“反对党-终身纲领”(5人)。他们的优势可以通过将候选人与这些政党的反对言论联系起来，以及他们与同情俄罗斯公众运动并将自己视为俄罗斯人的地区政党领导人的关系来解释。Rusin社区的一名代表参加了“人民公仆”党，一名代表参加了“Andrej Baloga团队”，候选人Ivan Danatsko, Ivan Palinkash和Ivan Bushko作为自我提名的候选人，与政党保持距离。
{"title":"Political and party representation of Rusin community leaders in Transcarpathia during the local elections of 2020","authors":"M. Zan","doi":"10.17223/18572685/68/20","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17223/18572685/68/20","url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on the political and party representation of the Rusin leaders in Transcarpathia (Ukraine) who particiapted in the local elections of 2020. The analysis is based on the electoral statistics and interviews with participants in the election campaign. According to the author, the Rusin leaders are heads and activists of national cultural associations and opinion leaders who do not represent ethno-cultural associations, but are widely known in Transcarpathia. The author argues that the new electoral system of “semi-open” party lists has resulted in the failure of local elections for all candidates representing the Rusin community. However, the electoral statistics shows that Rusin leaders actually received: 1) more votes than their opponents on the political party lists (Vladimir Fenych, Vasilij Sich, Nikolai Rishko); 2) the same number of votes (Svyatoslav Gal); 3) the required 25 % of the votes from the electoral quota (Yurij Shypovych). Most of the Rusin candidates ran for the political forces “For the Future” (7 persons) and “Opposition Platform - For Life” (5 persons). Their dominance can be explained by identifying candidates with the oppositional rhetoric of these parties, as well as their proximity to regional party leaders who sympathize with the Rusin public movement and identify themselves as Rusins. One of the representatives of Rusin community ran for the party of power “Servant of the People” (Svyatoslav Gal), one (Nikolaj Rishko) - for “The Team of Andrej Baloga” Candidates Ivan Danatsko, Ivan Palinkash, and Ivan Bushko, as self-nominated candidates, distanced themselves from political parties.","PeriodicalId":54120,"journal":{"name":"Rusin","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67581559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The mass resettlement of Rusins in the Russian Empire in the 19th century included a study migration. The largest influx of Rusin students happened in the second half of the 1860s – 1870s with the emergence of Slavic scholars. The gymnasium reform caused an urgent need for teachers of ancient languages, who were invited from the Habsburg monarchy. They were practicing teachers, graduates and university students, representatives of the Slavic peoples. After moving to Russia, they attended refresher courses and studied Russian in St. Petersburg as students of the Institute of Slavic Scholars (1866–1882). In total, about 160 Austro-Hungarian philologists attended the Institute. Of them, almost a third (45 people) were Rusins: Galicians (35 people) and Bukovinian and Ugric Rusins (5 persons each). They were mostly young people from the families of rural priests. Moving to Russia allowed them to get a teaching profession and find a job on more favorable terms than in their homeland. Subsequently, the overwhelming majority of Rusin scholars successfully adapted to the new conditions. Many of them worked in Russian educational institutions for many years; one in five eventually reached the post of director of a gymnasium. Thus, the Institute of Slavic Scholars can be considered a main channel for the emigration of the Rusin intelligentsia to the Russian Empire in the post-reform period.
{"title":"Rusins in the Institute of Slavic Scholars (1866–1882)","authors":"A. Ptitsyn","doi":"10.17223/18572685/70/6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17223/18572685/70/6","url":null,"abstract":"The mass resettlement of Rusins in the Russian Empire in the 19th century included a study migration. The largest influx of Rusin students happened in the second half of the 1860s – 1870s with the emergence of Slavic scholars. The gymnasium reform caused an urgent need for teachers of ancient languages, who were invited from the Habsburg monarchy. They were practicing teachers, graduates and university students, representatives of the Slavic peoples. After moving to Russia, they attended refresher courses and studied Russian in St. Petersburg as students of the Institute of Slavic Scholars (1866–1882). In total, about 160 Austro-Hungarian philologists attended the Institute. Of them, almost a third (45 people) were Rusins: Galicians (35 people) and Bukovinian and Ugric Rusins (5 persons each). They were mostly young people from the families of rural priests. Moving to Russia allowed them to get a teaching profession and find a job on more favorable terms than in their homeland. Subsequently, the overwhelming majority of Rusin scholars successfully adapted to the new conditions. Many of them worked in Russian educational institutions for many years; one in five eventually reached the post of director of a gymnasium. Thus, the Institute of Slavic Scholars can be considered a main channel for the emigration of the Rusin intelligentsia to the Russian Empire in the post-reform period.","PeriodicalId":54120,"journal":{"name":"Rusin","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67582386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This literary study of the Carpathian manifestation of The Springtime of Nations (1848-1849) is based of the short story “At the Hunting Campfire” from the collection “Rusini” [The Rusins] by Kajetan Abgarowicz (Abgar-Soltan), a Polish writer of Armenian descent of the late 19th - early 20th century. The imagological reflection of public sentiments of the 19th century is analysed through the lens of the discourse of the borderland as a state of culture awareness: the Polish (“ours” from the perspective of the Polish author) and “theirs” (i.e. Hutsul). The authors determine the Carpathian society before The Springtime of Nations as cultural borderlands of the Polish, Hutsul, German, Jewish, and Gypsy ethnic groups coexisted in daily life, with their fundamental values unchanged. They argue that the Hutsul community unconditionally accepted the imperative the Austrian highlanders, the model of neighborhood with the Poles, and trusting relations with the gypsies, but infernally mythologized of the Germans in the person of the local officer and his entourage. The focus is placed on the peculiarities of the Hutsul reception of news about the uprising against the Habsburgs outside the Carpathians and the development of the revolutionary events of the local “strange spring” in the contezt of the confrontation between the highlanders and the local authorities during the Carpathian stay of the Hungarian army, which rebelled against the Austrian emperor. The impact of revolutionary events on the HutsuL community is analyzed within their cultural identity awareness as of representatives of a separate ethnic group with its own history of resistance in in the context of opryshoks, an unusual, non-Polish cultural landscape, axiology, and ontology. In his “At the Hunting Campfire”, Kajetan Abgarowicz creates a literary version of the The Springtime of Nations in the Carpathians, with a new Look on the dialogue in the relationship between “our” and “their” cultural universes.
{"title":"The Hutsul Springtime of Nations by Kajetan Abgarowicz: the discourse of the borderland as a state of culture awareness","authors":"O. A. Fedorova, S. Lutsak, Iryna Y. Mykytyn","doi":"10.17223/18572685/67/15","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17223/18572685/67/15","url":null,"abstract":"This literary study of the Carpathian manifestation of The Springtime of Nations (1848-1849) is based of the short story “At the Hunting Campfire” from the collection “Rusini” [The Rusins] by Kajetan Abgarowicz (Abgar-Soltan), a Polish writer of Armenian descent of the late 19th - early 20th century. The imagological reflection of public sentiments of the 19th century is analysed through the lens of the discourse of the borderland as a state of culture awareness: the Polish (“ours” from the perspective of the Polish author) and “theirs” (i.e. Hutsul). The authors determine the Carpathian society before The Springtime of Nations as cultural borderlands of the Polish, Hutsul, German, Jewish, and Gypsy ethnic groups coexisted in daily life, with their fundamental values unchanged. They argue that the Hutsul community unconditionally accepted the imperative the Austrian highlanders, the model of neighborhood with the Poles, and trusting relations with the gypsies, but infernally mythologized of the Germans in the person of the local officer and his entourage. The focus is placed on the peculiarities of the Hutsul reception of news about the uprising against the Habsburgs outside the Carpathians and the development of the revolutionary events of the local “strange spring” in the contezt of the confrontation between the highlanders and the local authorities during the Carpathian stay of the Hungarian army, which rebelled against the Austrian emperor. The impact of revolutionary events on the HutsuL community is analyzed within their cultural identity awareness as of representatives of a separate ethnic group with its own history of resistance in in the context of opryshoks, an unusual, non-Polish cultural landscape, axiology, and ontology. In his “At the Hunting Campfire”, Kajetan Abgarowicz creates a literary version of the The Springtime of Nations in the Carpathians, with a new Look on the dialogue in the relationship between “our” and “their” cultural universes.","PeriodicalId":54120,"journal":{"name":"Rusin","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67580857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
According to the research, Academician Volodymyr Hnatiuk's scholarly inquiry had focused on the elements of multiculturalism long before the theory of multiculturalism was developed. Hnatiuk studied the problems of coexistence of different ethnic groups in the multicultural realm of the Eastern European area, with a partucLuar attention to the Ugrian Rusins. In his research, Hnatiuk employed basic concepts for modern multicultural studies, such as historically determined multicultural space of Eastern Europe, which combines national and ideological heterogeneity, cultural diffusion and social homogeneity. Yet the authors emphasize that Hnatiuk paid attention to the dominant concepts of ethnocultural frontiers, the contamination of ethnological and psychomental phenomena, the problems of preservation/Loss of the national identity, the political consensus in a poLyethnic society, the polyphony of national consciousness, and others. The multilevel reception of other ethnic groups by the Rusins is studied on the Materials from Ugric Rus (1897-1911) collected and processed by Hnatiuk. The primary role in this cultural topos is assigned to the Slavic nations, who are more often perceived in the plane of rapprochement rather than distance in the dichotomy of In-group/Out-group. The second level is interaction with non-Slavic European nations (Germans, Hungarians). However, the non-European influences were often a factor in the formation of Eastern European identity: the Jewish influence through the biblical books, as well as Central Asian influences from the Turkish attacks and the Ottoman rule in these lands. The authors conclude that the muLticuLturaList methodology expands the geocuLturaL context of ethnological research. The processed material convincingly proves that it can be applied to the European cultural and historical discourses of previous epochs, which contain the features provided by this theory.
{"title":"Understanding the multiculturalism of Eastern Europe in the folklore and ethnographic works of Volodymyr Hnatiuk about the Ugrian Rusins","authors":"M. Lanovyk, Z. Lanovyk","doi":"10.17223/18572685/67/19","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17223/18572685/67/19","url":null,"abstract":"According to the research, Academician Volodymyr Hnatiuk's scholarly inquiry had focused on the elements of multiculturalism long before the theory of multiculturalism was developed. Hnatiuk studied the problems of coexistence of different ethnic groups in the multicultural realm of the Eastern European area, with a partucLuar attention to the Ugrian Rusins. In his research, Hnatiuk employed basic concepts for modern multicultural studies, such as historically determined multicultural space of Eastern Europe, which combines national and ideological heterogeneity, cultural diffusion and social homogeneity. Yet the authors emphasize that Hnatiuk paid attention to the dominant concepts of ethnocultural frontiers, the contamination of ethnological and psychomental phenomena, the problems of preservation/Loss of the national identity, the political consensus in a poLyethnic society, the polyphony of national consciousness, and others. The multilevel reception of other ethnic groups by the Rusins is studied on the Materials from Ugric Rus (1897-1911) collected and processed by Hnatiuk. The primary role in this cultural topos is assigned to the Slavic nations, who are more often perceived in the plane of rapprochement rather than distance in the dichotomy of In-group/Out-group. The second level is interaction with non-Slavic European nations (Germans, Hungarians). However, the non-European influences were often a factor in the formation of Eastern European identity: the Jewish influence through the biblical books, as well as Central Asian influences from the Turkish attacks and the Ottoman rule in these lands. The authors conclude that the muLticuLturaList methodology expands the geocuLturaL context of ethnological research. The processed material convincingly proves that it can be applied to the European cultural and historical discourses of previous epochs, which contain the features provided by this theory.","PeriodicalId":54120,"journal":{"name":"Rusin","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67580940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The article analyses the views of Alexey Frolovich Filippov on the “Rusin question” in Chetm Land, Bessarabia, and other regions in the context of his social activities, views on the problems of various outskirts of the Russian Empire and adjacent territories in general. The analysis of Filippov's views on the “national question” covers both his political projects and the stance of the media under his administration. Particular attention is paid to Filippov's political position during the formative young years, his experience of living in multi-ethnic Mogilev, and participation in student communities at Moscow University. His trip to the Rusins of Chetm Land is considered in detail as a turning point in the formation of his program, which was imperial and nationalist at the same time. The author also considers the role of “Russian outskirts” in the context of Filippov's editorial program in his journal Russkoe Obozrenie in 1901-1903, with special attention given to the history of the Russian presence in Bessarabia. The article describes Filippov's activity on the outskirts of Russia in 1904-1911 as well as an updated national-democratic program designed during his political activity in St. Petersburg in 1912-1914. Filippov's views on the expansion of the Empire after the October Revolution developed during his service to Soviet power in 1917-1921. The author concludes that the problem of Filippov's attitude to the Rusins is closely related to the general methodological problem of the imperial outskirts in Russian conservative thought and that Filippov's approach to the outskirts developed within the framework of “imperial nationalism.”
{"title":"The Rusins of Chetm Land and Bessarabia in Aleksey Filippov’s views about the outskirts of the Russian Empire","authors":"M. Medovarov","doi":"10.17223/18572685/67/11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17223/18572685/67/11","url":null,"abstract":"The article analyses the views of Alexey Frolovich Filippov on the “Rusin question” in Chetm Land, Bessarabia, and other regions in the context of his social activities, views on the problems of various outskirts of the Russian Empire and adjacent territories in general. The analysis of Filippov's views on the “national question” covers both his political projects and the stance of the media under his administration. Particular attention is paid to Filippov's political position during the formative young years, his experience of living in multi-ethnic Mogilev, and participation in student communities at Moscow University. His trip to the Rusins of Chetm Land is considered in detail as a turning point in the formation of his program, which was imperial and nationalist at the same time. The author also considers the role of “Russian outskirts” in the context of Filippov's editorial program in his journal Russkoe Obozrenie in 1901-1903, with special attention given to the history of the Russian presence in Bessarabia. The article describes Filippov's activity on the outskirts of Russia in 1904-1911 as well as an updated national-democratic program designed during his political activity in St. Petersburg in 1912-1914. Filippov's views on the expansion of the Empire after the October Revolution developed during his service to Soviet power in 1917-1921. The author concludes that the problem of Filippov's attitude to the Rusins is closely related to the general methodological problem of the imperial outskirts in Russian conservative thought and that Filippov's approach to the outskirts developed within the framework of “imperial nationalism.”","PeriodicalId":54120,"journal":{"name":"Rusin","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67581036","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The article analyses the task of measuring completeness, representativeness, and balance when creating a corpus of Russian-language texts on Slavic literature. The criteria for a disciplinary corpus can be calculated using a bibliometric and scientometric approaches. Different categories of historical knowledge can denote phenomena comparable to the themes and problems of research in Slavic studies. A total of 76 historical categories have been tested (historical analogy, historical memory, historical possibility, historical time, historical personality, etc.). All historical categories associated with Slavic studies or with Rusins have been ranked according to the frequency of search results of full-text resources in scholar.google.ru and academia.edu. The following indicators have been identified and analysed: representation of Slavic studies in a number of other regional studies disciplines; joint occurrence of various linguistic disciplines with Slavic studies; correlation and distribution of the category of historical knowledge in texts with Slavic themes. The author has studied the frequency distribution of the connection between historical categories and Slavic studies and shown the specificity of the influence of Slavic subjects on different categories and functioning of historical consciousness in the Slavic academic community. He concludes that corpus balance can be considered at four levels within the possibility of creating: 1) a philological corpus with texts in various areas of linguistics and literary criticism; 2) a historiographic corpus with historical texts of various themes and genres in one language; 3) a regional corpus with texts on various regional disciplines; 4) a disciplinary corpus only on the subject of Slavic studies.
{"title":"Corpus bibliometric aspects of Slavic studies in Russian-language scholarly electronic resources in the context of categories of historical knowledge","authors":"A. Bocharov","doi":"10.17223/18572685/68/18","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17223/18572685/68/18","url":null,"abstract":"The article analyses the task of measuring completeness, representativeness, and balance when creating a corpus of Russian-language texts on Slavic literature. The criteria for a disciplinary corpus can be calculated using a bibliometric and scientometric approaches. Different categories of historical knowledge can denote phenomena comparable to the themes and problems of research in Slavic studies. A total of 76 historical categories have been tested (historical analogy, historical memory, historical possibility, historical time, historical personality, etc.). All historical categories associated with Slavic studies or with Rusins have been ranked according to the frequency of search results of full-text resources in scholar.google.ru and academia.edu. The following indicators have been identified and analysed: representation of Slavic studies in a number of other regional studies disciplines; joint occurrence of various linguistic disciplines with Slavic studies; correlation and distribution of the category of historical knowledge in texts with Slavic themes. The author has studied the frequency distribution of the connection between historical categories and Slavic studies and shown the specificity of the influence of Slavic subjects on different categories and functioning of historical consciousness in the Slavic academic community. He concludes that corpus balance can be considered at four levels within the possibility of creating: 1) a philological corpus with texts in various areas of linguistics and literary criticism; 2) a historiographic corpus with historical texts of various themes and genres in one language; 3) a regional corpus with texts on various regional disciplines; 4) a disciplinary corpus only on the subject of Slavic studies.","PeriodicalId":54120,"journal":{"name":"Rusin","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67581431","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The article dwells on the verbs with a diminutive meaning in Russian and Old Slavonic. It describes particular diminutive meanings in action designation and determines originality of prefix models with po- pod-, pri- with the semantics “to do something a little, without making special efforts, not to the full extent, not for long, for some time” for these languages. The work is based on the studies of the Slavic language picture of the world reflected by derivational means. The authors claim that verbs with these prefixes are highly productive in the modern Russian language. They indicate the diminutuve nature of the designated action not fully performed and/or evaluated as such and reflect the mentality of native Russian speakers (uncertainty, emotionality, reflexivity). Old Slavonic and Ancient Greek lexicographic sources contain a small number of units with the meaning of incompleteness and limitation of action. The authors emphasise different shades of attenuation in comparison with the Russian language, an increasing number of verbal units with the meaning of incomplete action in the Old Slavonic language, and the expanded range of partioiral meanings of attenuation. The difference in diminutive verbs of the Old Slavonic and Russian languages is associated with the peculiar worldviews of their speakers. The authors conclude about the original “attentuation” models in the Russian language. They argue that it was important for native speakers to characterise the designated actions from quantitative, productive, temporal, and other aspects relevant to the sphere of the Russian verb.
{"title":"The semantics of attenuation in the Old Slavonic and Russian Languages (based on verbal vocabulary)","authors":"Y. Fil, I. Kononchuk","doi":"10.17223/18572685/68/15","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17223/18572685/68/15","url":null,"abstract":"The article dwells on the verbs with a diminutive meaning in Russian and Old Slavonic. It describes particular diminutive meanings in action designation and determines originality of prefix models with po- pod-, pri- with the semantics “to do something a little, without making special efforts, not to the full extent, not for long, for some time” for these languages. The work is based on the studies of the Slavic language picture of the world reflected by derivational means. The authors claim that verbs with these prefixes are highly productive in the modern Russian language. They indicate the diminutuve nature of the designated action not fully performed and/or evaluated as such and reflect the mentality of native Russian speakers (uncertainty, emotionality, reflexivity). Old Slavonic and Ancient Greek lexicographic sources contain a small number of units with the meaning of incompleteness and limitation of action. The authors emphasise different shades of attenuation in comparison with the Russian language, an increasing number of verbal units with the meaning of incomplete action in the Old Slavonic language, and the expanded range of partioiral meanings of attenuation. The difference in diminutive verbs of the Old Slavonic and Russian languages is associated with the peculiar worldviews of their speakers. The authors conclude about the original “attentuation” models in the Russian language. They argue that it was important for native speakers to characterise the designated actions from quantitative, productive, temporal, and other aspects relevant to the sphere of the Russian verb.","PeriodicalId":54120,"journal":{"name":"Rusin","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67581602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article is devoted to Andrij Savka, a famous Rusin (Lemko) garnas - the leader of the Beskidniks (opryshki) robber detachment, a well-known leader of the insurrectionary and people's liberation movement in southern Poland and a hero of Eastern European folklore from Dukla (Poland). This valuable collection of little-known biographical information about this iconic figure focuses on the reasons why Savka became a robber, organized his own gang (Bursa) in the Beskydy Mountains and subsequently joined the Podhale Peasant Uprising of 1651 with his illustrious squad under the leadership of the Polish officer Aleksander Leon Kostka-Napierski. The main reason was the strong feudal oppression by the local Polish gentry, which forced the Rusin peasants to defend their interests, rights, and freedoms with deadly force, to fight against national and religious discrimination, serfdom, and oppression. The author emphasizes that Savka acted not in his personal and selfish interests, but out of a desire to help the commons. He distributed the property seized from magnates, landlords, and priests to poor Rusin peasants, for which he was dubbed as “Lemko Robin Hood”. The article thoroughly examines the significant role played by Savka and other famous Lemko rebels - Vasil Bayus and Vasil Chepets - in the people's liberation struggle that unfolded in Lesser Poland, Galicia and Subcarpathia and was supported by Hetman Bohdan Khmelnytsky and his associates. The author highlights the reasons why the Podhale Peasant Uprising of 1651 failed, with its leaders captured and put to death. He concludes that Savka played a progressive role in the history of the Rusins, in which he epitomizes courage and determination in the struggle for freedom and justice.
{"title":"The Rusin “Robin Hood” - Andrij Savka","authors":"K. Korsakov","doi":"10.17223/18572685/68/4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17223/18572685/68/4","url":null,"abstract":"This article is devoted to Andrij Savka, a famous Rusin (Lemko) garnas - the leader of the Beskidniks (opryshki) robber detachment, a well-known leader of the insurrectionary and people's liberation movement in southern Poland and a hero of Eastern European folklore from Dukla (Poland). This valuable collection of little-known biographical information about this iconic figure focuses on the reasons why Savka became a robber, organized his own gang (Bursa) in the Beskydy Mountains and subsequently joined the Podhale Peasant Uprising of 1651 with his illustrious squad under the leadership of the Polish officer Aleksander Leon Kostka-Napierski. The main reason was the strong feudal oppression by the local Polish gentry, which forced the Rusin peasants to defend their interests, rights, and freedoms with deadly force, to fight against national and religious discrimination, serfdom, and oppression. The author emphasizes that Savka acted not in his personal and selfish interests, but out of a desire to help the commons. He distributed the property seized from magnates, landlords, and priests to poor Rusin peasants, for which he was dubbed as “Lemko Robin Hood”. The article thoroughly examines the significant role played by Savka and other famous Lemko rebels - Vasil Bayus and Vasil Chepets - in the people's liberation struggle that unfolded in Lesser Poland, Galicia and Subcarpathia and was supported by Hetman Bohdan Khmelnytsky and his associates. The author highlights the reasons why the Podhale Peasant Uprising of 1651 failed, with its leaders captured and put to death. He concludes that Savka played a progressive role in the history of the Rusins, in which he epitomizes courage and determination in the struggle for freedom and justice.","PeriodicalId":54120,"journal":{"name":"Rusin","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67581615","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The article focuses on the issues of the Soviet Ukrainian periodicals Pravda Ukrainy(Kyiv) and Rabochaya gazeta (Kyiv), timed to the most popular Soviet public celebrations: New Year, May Day, and October Revolution Day. The author analyses the graphics of about 180 newspapers of 1953-1984 to determine the approaches to selecting visual elements (front page drawings, caricatures, cartoons and other decorative sketches). The chronology of newspaper images and symbols clearly shows the evolution of key political categories, their relevance, diversity, and interrelation, depending on the regional specificity of the newspaper. The visualization scheme naturally differed for each celebration. For example, the May Day or, especially, October Revolution Day newspaper issues invariably published portraits of Vladimir Lenin, while the political symbolism of New Year holiday referred to the Kremlin towers. In different years, the background that formed the plot of holday illustrations was industry or space exploration, international workers' parade or family life. The repetition of compositional and semantic elements not only emphasized their significance, but, in time, began to indicate the lack of new ideas. Meanwhile, the political satire, represented by foreign policy caricatures, gradually gave way to humorous cartoons related to domestic casual topics. The national specificity of visual symbolism could be found only in some types of visual images, as well as in accompanying texts in Ukrainian.
{"title":"The evolution of graphics in newspaper holiday issues in the Soviet Ukraine (1953-1984)","authors":"E. A. Fedosov","doi":"10.17223/18572685/69/15","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17223/18572685/69/15","url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on the issues of the Soviet Ukrainian periodicals Pravda Ukrainy(Kyiv) and Rabochaya gazeta (Kyiv), timed to the most popular Soviet public celebrations: New Year, May Day, and October Revolution Day. The author analyses the graphics of about 180 newspapers of 1953-1984 to determine the approaches to selecting visual elements (front page drawings, caricatures, cartoons and other decorative sketches). The chronology of newspaper images and symbols clearly shows the evolution of key political categories, their relevance, diversity, and interrelation, depending on the regional specificity of the newspaper. The visualization scheme naturally differed for each celebration. For example, the May Day or, especially, October Revolution Day newspaper issues invariably published portraits of Vladimir Lenin, while the political symbolism of New Year holiday referred to the Kremlin towers. In different years, the background that formed the plot of holday illustrations was industry or space exploration, international workers' parade or family life. The repetition of compositional and semantic elements not only emphasized their significance, but, in time, began to indicate the lack of new ideas. Meanwhile, the political satire, represented by foreign policy caricatures, gradually gave way to humorous cartoons related to domestic casual topics. The national specificity of visual symbolism could be found only in some types of visual images, as well as in accompanying texts in Ukrainian.","PeriodicalId":54120,"journal":{"name":"Rusin","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67582033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：