EXPRESSING NEGATIVITY IN SPEECH AND GESTURES OF SI-ERS

Q3 Arts and Humanities Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.20916/1812-3228-2022-1-80-89
O. Prokofyeva, E. Smirnova, V. D. Kharitonova
{"title":"EXPRESSING NEGATIVITY IN SPEECH AND GESTURES OF SI-ERS","authors":"O. Prokofyeva, E. Smirnova, V. D. Kharitonova","doi":"10.20916/1812-3228-2022-1-80-89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article elaborates on the role of negative language triggers for the highly demanding cognitive activity of simultaneous interpreting. Presumably, maintenance, omission or neutralization of negative information expresses a conscious decision of an interpreter. This process is often accompanied by certain co-speech gestures whose kinetic features we also subjected to analysis in this study. The data were collected during an experiment with 16 interpreters (8 from German and 8 from English). The information was annotated in ELAN program with further tests run in the Jamovi software. The results suggest that negative triggers tend to break monotony of interpretation and make interpreters process information more accurately, which is more typical of experienced interpreters. Both categories of interpreters though get emotionally involved, which can be seen by the gestural kinetic features traditionally associated with negativity (away movement, downward movement, palm down orientation, rubbing movement, usage of both hands and gesture space increase). At the same time the predominant part of negative items in the source text was preserved by the interpreters, who also created a “negativity balance”, adding negativity and neutralizing it to equalize the general negativity rate. Important differences associated with the language of the source text were not observed. Thus, a conclusion can be made that negativity disrupts the mechanical character of interpretation making interpreters more aware of the text contents.","PeriodicalId":53482,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2022-1-80-89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article elaborates on the role of negative language triggers for the highly demanding cognitive activity of simultaneous interpreting. Presumably, maintenance, omission or neutralization of negative information expresses a conscious decision of an interpreter. This process is often accompanied by certain co-speech gestures whose kinetic features we also subjected to analysis in this study. The data were collected during an experiment with 16 interpreters (8 from German and 8 from English). The information was annotated in ELAN program with further tests run in the Jamovi software. The results suggest that negative triggers tend to break monotony of interpretation and make interpreters process information more accurately, which is more typical of experienced interpreters. Both categories of interpreters though get emotionally involved, which can be seen by the gestural kinetic features traditionally associated with negativity (away movement, downward movement, palm down orientation, rubbing movement, usage of both hands and gesture space increase). At the same time the predominant part of negative items in the source text was preserved by the interpreters, who also created a “negativity balance”, adding negativity and neutralizing it to equalize the general negativity rate. Important differences associated with the language of the source text were not observed. Thus, a conclusion can be made that negativity disrupts the mechanical character of interpretation making interpreters more aware of the text contents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在si-ers的言语和手势中表达否定
本文阐述了负面语言触发因素在同声传译这一高要求认知活动中的作用。可以推测,对负面信息的保留、省略或中和表达了译员的一种有意识的决定。这一过程往往伴随着某些同语手势,我们在本研究中也对其动力学特征进行了分析。数据是在16名口译员(8名德语口译员和8名英语口译员)的实验中收集的。这些信息在ELAN程序中进行注释,并在Jamovi软件中进行进一步的测试。结果表明,负面触发因素往往会打破口译的单调性,使口译员对信息的处理更加准确,这在经验丰富的口译员中更为典型。这两种类型的口译员都有情感参与,这可以从传统上与消极相关的手势动力学特征(远离运动,向下运动,手掌向下运动,摩擦运动,双手使用和手势空间增加)中看出。与此同时,翻译人员保留了源文本中主要的否定项目,并创造了一种“否定平衡”,增加否定性并将其中和,以平衡一般否定率。没有观察到与源文本语言相关的重要差异。因此,我们可以得出这样的结论:消极性破坏了口译的机械特征,使口译者更加了解文本内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki
Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Issues of Cognitive Linguistics (Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki) is published under the auspices of the Russian Cognitive Linguists Association. It is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for linguistic research on topics which investigate the interaction between language and human cognition. The contributions focus on topics such as cognitive discourse analysis, phenomenology-based cognitive linguistic research, cognitive sociolinguistics, and cover such matters as mental space theory, blending theory, political discourse, cognitive stylistics, cognitive poetics, natural language categorization, conceptualization theory, lexical network theory, cognitive modeling. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics promotes the constructive interaction between linguistics and such neighbouring disciplines as sociology, cultural studies, psychology, neurolinguistics, communication studies, translation theory and educational linguistics.
期刊最新文献
DOMINANT PRINCIPLE IN LANGUAGE CONSCIOUSNESS OF A DEVIANT LANGUAGE PERSONALITY TEXT COMPLEXITY AS INTERDISCIPLINARY PROBLEM EXPRESSING NEGATIVITY IN SPEECH AND GESTURES OF SI-ERS COUNTERFACTUAL SOVIET PHOTOGRAPHY THROUGH THE LENS OF AMERICAN AND BRITISH ART CRITICS: EVALUATIVE DIMENSIONS OF ART DISCOURSE PRECEDENCE IN PARADIGMATICS AND SYNTAGMATICS (on the example of comparisons in modern German)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1