WAYS TO ELIMINATE DISSONANCE IN THE PERCEPTION OF FAKE NEWS: A COGNITIVE VIEW

Q3 Arts and Humanities Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-5-16
L. Furs
{"title":"WAYS TO ELIMINATE DISSONANCE IN THE PERCEPTION OF FAKE NEWS: A COGNITIVE VIEW","authors":"L. Furs","doi":"10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-5-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of research is to consider the cognitive basis for the formation of fake information and describe the ways of giving this information the characteristics of truth. To achieve this goal, were applied the method of cognitive modeling and cognitive-discourse analysis. In information processing in order to impart truth characteristics to fake information, both cognitive and metacognitive levels are activated. Static declarative knowledge, which is obtained empirically and is stored in the human memory, is not sufficient for the authors of fake news. Such knowledge is objective and does not create the necessary associations. Due to the metacognitive level and its aspect - procedural knowledge, the authors of fake news manage to process the information in such a way that despite its unreliability, newly designed knowledge is perceived as true. This process involves the cognitive mechanisms of generalization, specification, cognitive metonymy, metaphtonymy, conceptual comparison, visualization, frame recurrence, concept substitution, and attention nesting. These mechanisms act as components of the procedural knowledge model which is the basis for the adaptability of fake news to truth indicators. All cognitive mechanisms are characterized by purposefulness, controllability, dynamism and interactivity. We see the prospect of further research in the need to compare the cognitive principles and mechanisms that are in demand in the elimination of cognitive dissonance in the perception of fake news by different authors and on the material of other languages.","PeriodicalId":53482,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-5-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of research is to consider the cognitive basis for the formation of fake information and describe the ways of giving this information the characteristics of truth. To achieve this goal, were applied the method of cognitive modeling and cognitive-discourse analysis. In information processing in order to impart truth characteristics to fake information, both cognitive and metacognitive levels are activated. Static declarative knowledge, which is obtained empirically and is stored in the human memory, is not sufficient for the authors of fake news. Such knowledge is objective and does not create the necessary associations. Due to the metacognitive level and its aspect - procedural knowledge, the authors of fake news manage to process the information in such a way that despite its unreliability, newly designed knowledge is perceived as true. This process involves the cognitive mechanisms of generalization, specification, cognitive metonymy, metaphtonymy, conceptual comparison, visualization, frame recurrence, concept substitution, and attention nesting. These mechanisms act as components of the procedural knowledge model which is the basis for the adaptability of fake news to truth indicators. All cognitive mechanisms are characterized by purposefulness, controllability, dynamism and interactivity. We see the prospect of further research in the need to compare the cognitive principles and mechanisms that are in demand in the elimination of cognitive dissonance in the perception of fake news by different authors and on the material of other languages.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消除假新闻认知失调的方法:一种认知观点
研究的目的是考虑虚假信息形成的认知基础,并描述赋予这些信息真实特征的方法。为了实现这一目标,我们采用了认知建模和认知语篇分析的方法。在信息处理过程中,为了赋予虚假信息真实特征,认知和元认知两个层面都被激活。静态的陈述性知识是经验获得的,储存在人类的记忆中,对于假新闻的作者来说是不够的。这种认识是客观的,不会产生必要的联系。由于元认知水平及其方面——程序性知识,假新闻的作者设法以这样一种方式处理信息,尽管它不可靠,但新设计的知识被认为是真实的。这一过程涉及概括、规范、认知转喻、转喻、概念比较、可视化、框架递归、概念替代和注意嵌套等认知机制。这些机制作为程序知识模型的组成部分,而程序知识模型是假新闻对真相指标适应性的基础。所有的认知机制都具有目的性、可控性、动态性和互动性的特点。我们看到了进一步研究的前景,需要比较在消除不同作者和其他语言材料对假新闻感知的认知失调方面所需要的认知原则和机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki
Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Issues of Cognitive Linguistics (Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki) is published under the auspices of the Russian Cognitive Linguists Association. It is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for linguistic research on topics which investigate the interaction between language and human cognition. The contributions focus on topics such as cognitive discourse analysis, phenomenology-based cognitive linguistic research, cognitive sociolinguistics, and cover such matters as mental space theory, blending theory, political discourse, cognitive stylistics, cognitive poetics, natural language categorization, conceptualization theory, lexical network theory, cognitive modeling. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics promotes the constructive interaction between linguistics and such neighbouring disciplines as sociology, cultural studies, psychology, neurolinguistics, communication studies, translation theory and educational linguistics.
期刊最新文献
DOMINANT PRINCIPLE IN LANGUAGE CONSCIOUSNESS OF A DEVIANT LANGUAGE PERSONALITY TEXT COMPLEXITY AS INTERDISCIPLINARY PROBLEM EXPRESSING NEGATIVITY IN SPEECH AND GESTURES OF SI-ERS COUNTERFACTUAL SOVIET PHOTOGRAPHY THROUGH THE LENS OF AMERICAN AND BRITISH ART CRITICS: EVALUATIVE DIMENSIONS OF ART DISCOURSE PRECEDENCE IN PARADIGMATICS AND SYNTAGMATICS (on the example of comparisons in modern German)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1