MEMES AS TOOL FOR DECONSTRUCTING MEDIA MANIPULATION

Q3 Arts and Humanities Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-74-86
E. Troshchenkova
{"title":"MEMES AS TOOL FOR DECONSTRUCTING MEDIA MANIPULATION","authors":"E. Troshchenkova","doi":"10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-74-86","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the article is to examine meme-macros on the issues of manipulation in digital media, to carry out cognitive modeling of the Internet users’ ideas how the new media implement the manipulation of their consciousness, which techniques of influence attract the public attention and what conclusions they draw for themselves. Internet meme macros (151 items) - polycode text-combinations of a static picture and an inscription - were selected by the main query in the Google and Yandex search engines using the phrases “media manipulation memes”, “memes on media manipulation” and “manipulation in media memes”. Additionally, the paper takes into account the material from 165 Internet meme texts on the query “Facebook down memes” after the large-scale disruption of the social network Facebook and affiliated resources in October 2021, as well as 60 meme texts dedicated to the renaming of Facebook to Meta. Methodologically, the study is the identification of coordination patterns as manifestations of the results of collective comprehension and evaluation of significant events and phenomena. A functional-semantic analysis of the elements that make up the meme (iconic and verbal) is carried out, and their interaction is looked into, so that after meaningful interpretation the selected material could be divided into thematic groups according to what repeated patterns of argumentation are in the selected material and how they are marked by the specific use of linguistic and visual means. Thus, the set of the memes in question is analyzed to see how it concentrates and articulates the most important ideas of the audience as their collective creator about a particular problem. Thus, we think it possible to speak of at least four coordination patterns, however, being aware that this division is rather arbitrary, as they intersect. Nevertheless, it is theoretically possible to talk about 1) the basic understanding of the media as a source of manipulation that needs to be resisted and the three clarifying patterns of reasoning that manipulation is realized through 2) selectivity in the presentation of information; 3) verbal twisting; 4) playing on the emotions of the audience, causing users to lose money and personal data or to become involved in some activity against their will.","PeriodicalId":53482,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-74-86","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the article is to examine meme-macros on the issues of manipulation in digital media, to carry out cognitive modeling of the Internet users’ ideas how the new media implement the manipulation of their consciousness, which techniques of influence attract the public attention and what conclusions they draw for themselves. Internet meme macros (151 items) - polycode text-combinations of a static picture and an inscription - were selected by the main query in the Google and Yandex search engines using the phrases “media manipulation memes”, “memes on media manipulation” and “manipulation in media memes”. Additionally, the paper takes into account the material from 165 Internet meme texts on the query “Facebook down memes” after the large-scale disruption of the social network Facebook and affiliated resources in October 2021, as well as 60 meme texts dedicated to the renaming of Facebook to Meta. Methodologically, the study is the identification of coordination patterns as manifestations of the results of collective comprehension and evaluation of significant events and phenomena. A functional-semantic analysis of the elements that make up the meme (iconic and verbal) is carried out, and their interaction is looked into, so that after meaningful interpretation the selected material could be divided into thematic groups according to what repeated patterns of argumentation are in the selected material and how they are marked by the specific use of linguistic and visual means. Thus, the set of the memes in question is analyzed to see how it concentrates and articulates the most important ideas of the audience as their collective creator about a particular problem. Thus, we think it possible to speak of at least four coordination patterns, however, being aware that this division is rather arbitrary, as they intersect. Nevertheless, it is theoretically possible to talk about 1) the basic understanding of the media as a source of manipulation that needs to be resisted and the three clarifying patterns of reasoning that manipulation is realized through 2) selectivity in the presentation of information; 3) verbal twisting; 4) playing on the emotions of the audience, causing users to lose money and personal data or to become involved in some activity against their will.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模因是解构媒体操纵的工具
本文的目的是研究模因宏对数字媒体操纵问题的影响,对互联网用户的想法进行认知建模,新媒体如何实现对他们意识的操纵,哪些影响技术吸引了公众的注意,以及他们为自己得出了什么结论。互联网模因宏(151项)——由静态图片和题词组成的多码文本组合——是在b谷歌和Yandex搜索引擎上使用“媒体操纵模因”、“媒体操纵模因上的模因”和“媒体模因中的模因”等短语进行的主要查询中选出的。此外,本文还考虑了在2021年10月社交网络Facebook及其附属资源大规模中断后,165个互联网模因文本查询“Facebook down memes”的材料,以及60个致力于将Facebook重命名为Meta的模因文本。在方法上,这项研究是确定协调模式作为对重大事件和现象的集体理解和评价结果的表现。对构成模因的元素(符号和言语)进行功能语义分析,并研究它们之间的相互作用,以便在有意义的解释之后,根据所选材料中有哪些重复的论证模式以及如何通过具体使用语言和视觉手段来标记它们,将所选材料划分为主题组。因此,我们将分析所讨论的模因集合,以了解它如何集中和阐明作为集体创造者的观众对特定问题的最重要想法。因此,我们认为可以谈论至少四种协调模式,然而,我们意识到这种划分相当武断,因为它们相互交叉。然而,从理论上讲,我们可以讨论:1)对媒体作为一种需要抵制的操纵来源的基本理解,以及操纵是通过2)信息呈现的选择性实现的三种澄清性推理模式;3)言语扭曲;4)利用受众的情绪,导致用户损失金钱和个人数据,或者违背用户的意愿参与某些活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki
Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Issues of Cognitive Linguistics (Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki) is published under the auspices of the Russian Cognitive Linguists Association. It is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for linguistic research on topics which investigate the interaction between language and human cognition. The contributions focus on topics such as cognitive discourse analysis, phenomenology-based cognitive linguistic research, cognitive sociolinguistics, and cover such matters as mental space theory, blending theory, political discourse, cognitive stylistics, cognitive poetics, natural language categorization, conceptualization theory, lexical network theory, cognitive modeling. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics promotes the constructive interaction between linguistics and such neighbouring disciplines as sociology, cultural studies, psychology, neurolinguistics, communication studies, translation theory and educational linguistics.
期刊最新文献
DOMINANT PRINCIPLE IN LANGUAGE CONSCIOUSNESS OF A DEVIANT LANGUAGE PERSONALITY TEXT COMPLEXITY AS INTERDISCIPLINARY PROBLEM EXPRESSING NEGATIVITY IN SPEECH AND GESTURES OF SI-ERS COUNTERFACTUAL SOVIET PHOTOGRAPHY THROUGH THE LENS OF AMERICAN AND BRITISH ART CRITICS: EVALUATIVE DIMENSIONS OF ART DISCOURSE PRECEDENCE IN PARADIGMATICS AND SYNTAGMATICS (on the example of comparisons in modern German)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1