INSTRUCTION STRATEGY IN RUSSIAN AND ENGLISH ACADEMIC DISCOURSE

Q3 Arts and Humanities Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-125-133
L. Enbaeva
{"title":"INSTRUCTION STRATEGY IN RUSSIAN AND ENGLISH ACADEMIC DISCOURSE","authors":"L. Enbaeva","doi":"10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-125-133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper addresses the issue of instruction strategy employment in the academic discourse from the viewpoint of cognitive-discursive paradigm. The aim of the paper is to reveal discursive tactics actualizing the instruction strategy in Chemistry textbooks and compare them cross-culturally. Comparison of Russian and English Chemistry textbooks was conducted to draw a sample of discourse moves that aim to develop cognitive skills; they were analysed in order to structure the received sample. The comparative analysis resulted in the proposal of a classification of instruction tactics in accordance with the expected learning outcomes. It comprises two types of instruction tactics: subject-specific and meta-subject. The paper highlights a few differences in the application of instruction tactics in Russian and English Chemistry textbooks. The differences involve variation of verbal expression and position characteristics as well as functional differences. One possible application of research results might be connected with enhancing textbook writer’s awareness of instruction strategy and tactics employment with the view of expected learning outcomes. The proposed classification could be applied in teaching materials design. In summary, cross-cultural comparison of textbooks can be beneficial to our further understanding of academic discourse and cognitive development.","PeriodicalId":53482,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-125-133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper addresses the issue of instruction strategy employment in the academic discourse from the viewpoint of cognitive-discursive paradigm. The aim of the paper is to reveal discursive tactics actualizing the instruction strategy in Chemistry textbooks and compare them cross-culturally. Comparison of Russian and English Chemistry textbooks was conducted to draw a sample of discourse moves that aim to develop cognitive skills; they were analysed in order to structure the received sample. The comparative analysis resulted in the proposal of a classification of instruction tactics in accordance with the expected learning outcomes. It comprises two types of instruction tactics: subject-specific and meta-subject. The paper highlights a few differences in the application of instruction tactics in Russian and English Chemistry textbooks. The differences involve variation of verbal expression and position characteristics as well as functional differences. One possible application of research results might be connected with enhancing textbook writer’s awareness of instruction strategy and tactics employment with the view of expected learning outcomes. The proposed classification could be applied in teaching materials design. In summary, cross-cultural comparison of textbooks can be beneficial to our further understanding of academic discourse and cognitive development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄语和英语学术话语教学策略
本文从认知-话语范式的角度探讨了教学策略在学术话语中的运用问题。本文旨在揭示化学教材中话语策略在教学策略实施中的作用,并进行跨文化比较。通过对俄英化学教材的比较,得出了旨在培养认知技能的语篇动作样本;为了构造收到的样品,对它们进行了分析。通过对比分析,提出了基于预期学习成果的教学策略分类。它包括两种教学策略:特定学科教学策略和元学科教学策略。本文着重分析了俄英化学教材在教学策略运用上的一些差异。这些差异不仅包括言语表达和位置特征的差异,还包括功能上的差异。研究结果的一个可能的应用可能与提高教科书编写者从期望学习成果的角度对教学策略和战术的使用的认识有关。该分类方法可应用于教材设计。综上所述,教科书的跨文化比较有助于我们进一步理解学术话语和认知发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki
Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Issues of Cognitive Linguistics (Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki) is published under the auspices of the Russian Cognitive Linguists Association. It is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for linguistic research on topics which investigate the interaction between language and human cognition. The contributions focus on topics such as cognitive discourse analysis, phenomenology-based cognitive linguistic research, cognitive sociolinguistics, and cover such matters as mental space theory, blending theory, political discourse, cognitive stylistics, cognitive poetics, natural language categorization, conceptualization theory, lexical network theory, cognitive modeling. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics promotes the constructive interaction between linguistics and such neighbouring disciplines as sociology, cultural studies, psychology, neurolinguistics, communication studies, translation theory and educational linguistics.
期刊最新文献
DOMINANT PRINCIPLE IN LANGUAGE CONSCIOUSNESS OF A DEVIANT LANGUAGE PERSONALITY TEXT COMPLEXITY AS INTERDISCIPLINARY PROBLEM EXPRESSING NEGATIVITY IN SPEECH AND GESTURES OF SI-ERS COUNTERFACTUAL SOVIET PHOTOGRAPHY THROUGH THE LENS OF AMERICAN AND BRITISH ART CRITICS: EVALUATIVE DIMENSIONS OF ART DISCOURSE PRECEDENCE IN PARADIGMATICS AND SYNTAGMATICS (on the example of comparisons in modern German)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1