Determination of Quality Properties of Sucuk Produced Using Cattle Head Meat

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Meat Technology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.18485/meattech.2023.64.1.2
R. Kara
{"title":"Determination of Quality Properties of Sucuk Produced Using Cattle Head Meat","authors":"R. Kara","doi":"10.18485/meattech.2023.64.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A b s t r a c t: Sucuk is produced by mixing beef, animal fat and different spices. Usage of head meat, which is relatively more affordable, for sucuk production has started to increase, especially depending on red meat prices. In this study, 100% beef (group A) or 100% cattle head meat (group B) were used for sucuk production. Both groups of sucuk were heat‑treated. Microbiological, chemi‑ cal, sensorial and histological properties were analysed in sucuk. Enterobacteriaceae, coliform bacteria and Escherichia coli levels were all <2.00 log CFU/g in both sucuk groups; the numbers of total aerobic bacteria and Micrococcus/Staphylococcus were 4.95 log CFU/g and 2.13 log CFU/g in group A; 5.23 log CFU/g and 2.25 log CFU/g in group B, respectively. The pH of group A sucuk was lower than that of group B. Hydroxyproline and connective tissue contents of group B were higher than those of group A. Outer surface lightness value (L) was higher in group A, and redness (a) was higher in group B. Texture analysis showed that group B had higher hardness, cohesiveness and gumminess values, while group A had higher springiness and chewiness values. Striated muscle and adi‑ pose tissue were detected in group A, and sero‑mucous tissues were found in group B during the histological analysis. Group A sucuk, in the sensory analysis, achieved higher general satisfaction scores than group B. As a result, head meat can be used in sucuk production.","PeriodicalId":18295,"journal":{"name":"Meat Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meat Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18485/meattech.2023.64.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A b s t r a c t: Sucuk is produced by mixing beef, animal fat and different spices. Usage of head meat, which is relatively more affordable, for sucuk production has started to increase, especially depending on red meat prices. In this study, 100% beef (group A) or 100% cattle head meat (group B) were used for sucuk production. Both groups of sucuk were heat‑treated. Microbiological, chemi‑ cal, sensorial and histological properties were analysed in sucuk. Enterobacteriaceae, coliform bacteria and Escherichia coli levels were all <2.00 log CFU/g in both sucuk groups; the numbers of total aerobic bacteria and Micrococcus/Staphylococcus were 4.95 log CFU/g and 2.13 log CFU/g in group A; 5.23 log CFU/g and 2.25 log CFU/g in group B, respectively. The pH of group A sucuk was lower than that of group B. Hydroxyproline and connective tissue contents of group B were higher than those of group A. Outer surface lightness value (L) was higher in group A, and redness (a) was higher in group B. Texture analysis showed that group B had higher hardness, cohesiveness and gumminess values, while group A had higher springiness and chewiness values. Striated muscle and adi‑ pose tissue were detected in group A, and sero‑mucous tissues were found in group B during the histological analysis. Group A sucuk, in the sensory analysis, achieved higher general satisfaction scores than group B. As a result, head meat can be used in sucuk production.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以牛头肉为原料生产肉糜的质量特性测定
牛油是由牛肉、动物脂肪和不同的香料混合而成。猪头肉的价格相对较低,用于猪吸盘生产的使用量开始增加,特别是取决于红肉的价格。本试验采用100%牛肉(A组)或100%牛头肉(B组)进行吸吮生产。两组患者均进行热处理。对其微生物学、化学、感觉和组织学特性进行了分析。两组肠道杆菌科、大肠菌群和大肠杆菌水平均<2.00 log CFU/g;A组总需氧菌数和微球菌/葡萄球菌数分别为4.95和2.13 log CFU/g;B组为5.23 log CFU/g, 2.25 log CFU/g。A组吸附剂的pH值低于B组。B组吸附剂的羟脯氨酸和结缔组织含量高于A组。A组吸附剂的外表面亮度值(L)高于A组,红度值(A)高于B组。质地分析表明,B组吸附剂的硬度、黏结性和胶性值较高,而A组吸附剂的弹性和嚼劲值较高。A组观察到横纹肌和脂肪组织,B组观察到血清粘膜组织。在感官分析中,A组猪猪的总体满意度得分高于b组猪猪,因此头肉可用于猪猪生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Meat Technology
Meat Technology Veterinary-Food Animals
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Development, Characterization and Investigation of Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Potential of Sodium Caseinate-Based Edible Films Infused with Berberis pseudumbellata Fruit Extract, and Effects of the Films on the Quality of Raw Ground Beef During Refrigeration Determination of Quality Properties of Sucuk Produced Using Cattle Head Meat Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors Impacting Fresh Goat Meat Quality: An Overview The Profitability of the Meat Industry in Serbia: Did the COVID-19 Pandemic Have Any Impact? Mind over Palate: Unveiling the Role of Neuromarketing in the Food Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1