Consciousness and enlightenment in the Boletim de Eugenia (1929-1933): Rethinking the concept of eugenic education in Brazil

Q4 Social Sciences Revista Portuguesa de Educacao Pub Date : 2023-07-10 DOI:10.21814/rpe.24742
Guilherme Prado Roitberg
{"title":"Consciousness and enlightenment in the Boletim de Eugenia (1929-1933): Rethinking the concept of eugenic education in Brazil","authors":"Guilherme Prado Roitberg","doi":"10.21814/rpe.24742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the concept of eugenic education in the Boletim de Eugenia (1929-1933), the biggest specialized newspaper in the science of racial improvement and the main means of scientific racism's dissemination in Brazil. Edited in Rio de Janeiro by the doctor and pharmacist Renato Kehl between 1929 and 1931, its direction was assumed from 1932 by the professors of the Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz” (ESALQ) Octavio Domingues and Salvador de Toledo Piza Júnior. Besides changing the periodical's characteristics, losing the aspect of a propaganda newspaper, and assuming the format of a scientific journal, the two renowned geneticists from Piracicaba scientifically supported Kehl's Mendelian eugenics, ensuring the continuity and radicalization of his project. Taking as a theoretical-methodological framework documentary research in dialogue with Critical Theory, we investigate the mobilization and the interrelation between the concepts of consciousness and enlightenment in the articles published in the Boletim de Eugenia. We found that the concept of eugenic education was presented in an ambiguous and contradictory way in these texts, reflecting the broad sense in which the term was structured by Francis Galton, but also how the notions of enlightenment and eugenic consciousness were interpreted by the journal's directors. We conclude that the term eugenic education, used in a generalizing form in the historiography of eugenics, is insufficient for a critical understanding of the narrow and broad meanings of education developed from Galton to the most radical members of the Brazilian eugenic movement.","PeriodicalId":37277,"journal":{"name":"Revista Portuguesa de Educacao","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Portuguesa de Educacao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21814/rpe.24742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyzes the concept of eugenic education in the Boletim de Eugenia (1929-1933), the biggest specialized newspaper in the science of racial improvement and the main means of scientific racism's dissemination in Brazil. Edited in Rio de Janeiro by the doctor and pharmacist Renato Kehl between 1929 and 1931, its direction was assumed from 1932 by the professors of the Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz” (ESALQ) Octavio Domingues and Salvador de Toledo Piza Júnior. Besides changing the periodical's characteristics, losing the aspect of a propaganda newspaper, and assuming the format of a scientific journal, the two renowned geneticists from Piracicaba scientifically supported Kehl's Mendelian eugenics, ensuring the continuity and radicalization of his project. Taking as a theoretical-methodological framework documentary research in dialogue with Critical Theory, we investigate the mobilization and the interrelation between the concepts of consciousness and enlightenment in the articles published in the Boletim de Eugenia. We found that the concept of eugenic education was presented in an ambiguous and contradictory way in these texts, reflecting the broad sense in which the term was structured by Francis Galton, but also how the notions of enlightenment and eugenic consciousness were interpreted by the journal's directors. We conclude that the term eugenic education, used in a generalizing form in the historiography of eugenics, is insufficient for a critical understanding of the narrow and broad meanings of education developed from Galton to the most radical members of the Brazilian eugenic movement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“优生运动”(1929-1933)中的意识与启示:对巴西优生教育概念的再思考
本文分析了《Boletim de Eugenia》(1929-1933)中优生教育的概念。《Boletim de Eugenia》是巴西最大的种族改良科学专业报纸,也是科学种族主义在巴西传播的主要手段。1929年至1931年,医生兼药剂师雷纳托·凯尔在巴西里约热内卢编辑,1932年起由高等农业大学“路易斯·德·奎罗兹”(ESALQ)奥克塔维奥·多明戈斯和萨尔瓦多·德·托莱多·比萨教授担任主编Júnior。这两位来自皮拉西卡巴的著名遗传学家除了改变了期刊的特点,失去了宣传报纸的特点,采用了科学期刊的形式外,还从科学上支持了凯尔的孟德尔优生学,确保了他的计划的连续性和激进性。我们将文献研究作为一种与批判理论对话的理论方法论框架,考察《博勒姆·德·尤金尼亚》发表的文章中意识和启蒙概念的动员及其相互关系。我们发现优生教育的概念在这些文本中以一种模棱两可和矛盾的方式呈现,这反映了弗朗西斯·高尔顿(Francis Galton)在广义上构建了这个术语,但也反映了期刊主管如何解释启蒙和优生意识的概念。我们的结论是,优生教育这个术语,在优生学的历史编纂中以一种概括的形式使用,不足以批判性地理解从高尔顿到巴西优生运动中最激进的成员所发展的教育的狭义和广义含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Portuguesa de Educacao
Revista Portuguesa de Educacao Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊最新文献
Recensão da obra “The Education Systems of the Americas” Teachers’ Perspectives on Planning for School Improvement: Processes, Critical Factors, and Perceived Outcomes Consciousness and enlightenment in the Boletim de Eugenia (1929-1933): Rethinking the concept of eugenic education in Brazil A prática pedagógica reflexiva em questão: Estudo de caso de uma escola brasileira Tradução, adaptação e validação do conteúdo do instrumento de avaliação Preschooler Awareness of Stuttering Survey para o português europeu
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1