Peer Coaching and Health Science Practicums: Best Practices of Experienced Clinical Educators

IF 0.9 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.24384/9W4F-WX91
Richard K. Ladyshewsky, B. Sanderson
{"title":"Peer Coaching and Health Science Practicums: Best Practices of Experienced Clinical Educators","authors":"Richard K. Ladyshewsky, B. Sanderson","doi":"10.24384/9W4F-WX91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The health sciences sector uses work integrated learning to prepare professionals for practice and has done so predominately using a traditional apprenticeship model. Over the past two decades there has been an increasing focus on integrating peer coaching into this learning environment. While peer coaching can occur informally, failure to formalize the process and train participants can negatively impact rapport-building, trust and learning outcomes. Hence, clinical educators often need some guidance in supporting this placement model. As a result, this research examines the best practices of 31 highly experienced clinical educators within a peer coaching placement model by capturing their explicit and tacit supervisory knowledge.","PeriodicalId":44889,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring","volume":"19 1","pages":"44-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24384/9W4F-WX91","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The health sciences sector uses work integrated learning to prepare professionals for practice and has done so predominately using a traditional apprenticeship model. Over the past two decades there has been an increasing focus on integrating peer coaching into this learning environment. While peer coaching can occur informally, failure to formalize the process and train participants can negatively impact rapport-building, trust and learning outcomes. Hence, clinical educators often need some guidance in supporting this placement model. As a result, this research examines the best practices of 31 highly experienced clinical educators within a peer coaching placement model by capturing their explicit and tacit supervisory knowledge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同伴指导和健康科学实习:经验丰富的临床教育者的最佳实践
卫生科学部门利用工作综合学习为专业人员的实践做好准备,主要采用传统的学徒模式。在过去的二十年里,越来越多的人关注将同伴辅导融入到这种学习环境中。虽然同伴指导可以非正式地进行,但未能将过程正规化并培训参与者可能会对建立关系、信任和学习成果产生负面影响。因此,临床教育工作者通常需要一些指导来支持这种安置模式。因此,本研究考察了31位经验丰富的临床教育工作者在同伴辅导安置模型中的最佳实践,通过捕捉他们的显性和隐性监督知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
42.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
How have workplace coaches experienced coaching during the Covid-19 pandemic? A Parallel Journey: The varied roles of coaching in an elite athlete's transition to a second career The role of courage in the development and practice of coaches Understanding the coaching experiences of non-traditional students in Higher Education in the UK A Qualitative Evaluation of SMU’s Peer Helpers Programme
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1