Effect of Low Glycemic Index Stevia-Benefiber Sweetener on the Physical, Textural and Sensory Qualities of Oatmeal Raisin Cookies

K. Bukolt, N. Ramirez, A. Saenz, K. Mirza, S. Bhaduri, K. Navder
{"title":"Effect of Low Glycemic Index Stevia-Benefiber Sweetener on the Physical, Textural and Sensory Qualities of Oatmeal Raisin Cookies","authors":"K. Bukolt, N. Ramirez, A. Saenz, K. Mirza, S. Bhaduri, K. Navder","doi":"10.35248/2157-7110.19.10.804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to test the effectiveness of a 33%, 50%, 66% and 100% substitution of white and brown sugar with a zero calorie sweetener (Stevia) and a bulking agent (Benefiber). As Stevia and Benefiber increased, %Δ weight, %Δ height and pH did not differ significantly between variations and control samples. Compared to control, moisture decreased significantly with all substitutions (p<0.05). Water activity decreased significantly with 66% and 100% substitutions. Area and diameter also significantly decreased with the replacement of sugar. Hunter colorimeter showed significantly increased crust lightness at 66% and 100% while the crumb lightness decreased significantly with all substitutions. Texture analysis measured using a TA.XT Plus Texture Analyzer (Texture Technologies Corp., Scarsdale, NY) indicated a significant increase in fracturability at 66% and 100% substitution. Hardness was found to significantly increase by 50%, 66% and 100% (p<0.05). Sensory evaluations indicated that substitutions at 50%, 66%, and 100% were significantly different (p<0.05) in color, texture, taste and overall acceptability compared to control. Substitutions at 33%, 50% and 66% all ranked above 3 (acceptable) in appearance, color, taste, texture and overall acceptability. The nutrient analysis showed that the 66% variation increased in fiber by 3 grams (289.09%), and decreased in sugar content by over 4 grams (-48.70%) per 27 grams serving compared to control. Improved nutritional content and acceptability make Stevia and Benefiber a viable sugar replacement at 66% substitution for oatmeal cookies.","PeriodicalId":90897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food processing & technology","volume":"133 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food processing & technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2157-7110.19.10.804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study was conducted to test the effectiveness of a 33%, 50%, 66% and 100% substitution of white and brown sugar with a zero calorie sweetener (Stevia) and a bulking agent (Benefiber). As Stevia and Benefiber increased, %Δ weight, %Δ height and pH did not differ significantly between variations and control samples. Compared to control, moisture decreased significantly with all substitutions (p<0.05). Water activity decreased significantly with 66% and 100% substitutions. Area and diameter also significantly decreased with the replacement of sugar. Hunter colorimeter showed significantly increased crust lightness at 66% and 100% while the crumb lightness decreased significantly with all substitutions. Texture analysis measured using a TA.XT Plus Texture Analyzer (Texture Technologies Corp., Scarsdale, NY) indicated a significant increase in fracturability at 66% and 100% substitution. Hardness was found to significantly increase by 50%, 66% and 100% (p<0.05). Sensory evaluations indicated that substitutions at 50%, 66%, and 100% were significantly different (p<0.05) in color, texture, taste and overall acceptability compared to control. Substitutions at 33%, 50% and 66% all ranked above 3 (acceptable) in appearance, color, taste, texture and overall acceptability. The nutrient analysis showed that the 66% variation increased in fiber by 3 grams (289.09%), and decreased in sugar content by over 4 grams (-48.70%) per 27 grams serving compared to control. Improved nutritional content and acceptability make Stevia and Benefiber a viable sugar replacement at 66% substitution for oatmeal cookies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低血糖指数甜菊糖-贝尼纤维甜味剂对燕麦葡萄干饼干物理、质地和感官品质的影响
本研究的目的是测试用零热量甜味剂(甜菊糖)和膨化剂(Benefiber)分别代替33%、50%、66%和100%的白糖和红糖的有效性。随着甜叶菊和贝尼法尔的增加,变异样品和对照样品之间的%Δ体重、%Δ身高和pH没有显著差异。与对照相比,各替代处理的水分均显著降低(p<0.05)。66%和100%替代后,水活度显著降低。随着糖的添加,面积和直径也显著减小。亨特色度计在66%和100%时显着增加了外壳亮度,而所有替代都显着降低了面包屑亮度。用TA测定织构分析。XT Plus纹理分析仪(Texture Technologies Corp., Scarsdale, NY)表明,可压裂性显著提高66%和100%。硬度分别提高50%、66%和100% (p<0.05)。感官评价表明,与对照组相比,50%、66%和100%的替代品在颜色、质地、味道和总体可接受性方面存在显著差异(p<0.05)。33%, 50%和66%的替代品在外观,颜色,味道,质地和总体可接受性方面均排名在3(可接受)以上。营养分析表明,与对照组相比,每27克的纤维含量增加了3克(289.09%),糖含量减少了4克(-48.70%)以上。改善的营养成分和可接受性使甜菊糖和贝尼法纤维成为可行的糖替代品,替代燕麦饼干66%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Formulation Optimization and Evaluation of Probiotic Lactobacillus sporogenes-Loaded Sodium Alginate with Carboxymethyl Cellulose Mucoadhesive Beads Using Design Expert Software” Innovative sensor system and evaluation procedure for monitoring of food processing Carotenoid content, total phenolic content, asntioxidant activity and carotenoids compounds of non-aqueous extracts from chillis (Capsicum annuum L.) Effect of Low Glycemic Index Stevia-Benefiber Sweetener on the Physical, Textural and Sensory Qualities of Oatmeal Raisin Cookies Process Parameter Estimation of Biodiesel Production from Waste Frying Oil (Vegetable and Palm oil) using Homogeneous Catalyst
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1