The challenge of relating IS research to practice

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 1998-01-01 DOI:10.4018/IRMJ.1998010103
J. Senn
{"title":"The challenge of relating IS research to practice","authors":"J. Senn","doi":"10.4018/IRMJ.1998010103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"The academic IS community is following slowly.\" \"The work is not relevant, reachable, or readable.\" \"If they've never personally done it, how can they possibly advise someone?\" \"If I want to know what works or what's being tried, I'll pick up the phone and get a hold of my counterpart in other companies...With few exceptions, the academic IS community doesn't have a clue.\" These, and a substantial number of other highly critical comments, made by chief information officers in major corporations, were captured during the course of structured interviews conducted with information technology professionals participating in a research program currently in process 1 Senn, 1997. They are representative of many similar expressions concerning university-based information systems research. Moreover, they appear to be consistent with assessments and impressions sensed by many persons conducting information systems research from an academic home base. Judging from the apparent frequency and consistency of these judgments, it is evident that a sizeable portion of the practitioner community does not value the research conducted by information systems IS scholars. This paper explores the challenge of relating IS research to practice. It suggests alternatives for researchers to consider if they seek an impact on practice and an ongoing communication link with practitioners.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"68","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IRMJ.1998010103","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 68

Abstract

"The academic IS community is following slowly." "The work is not relevant, reachable, or readable." "If they've never personally done it, how can they possibly advise someone?" "If I want to know what works or what's being tried, I'll pick up the phone and get a hold of my counterpart in other companies...With few exceptions, the academic IS community doesn't have a clue." These, and a substantial number of other highly critical comments, made by chief information officers in major corporations, were captured during the course of structured interviews conducted with information technology professionals participating in a research program currently in process 1 Senn, 1997. They are representative of many similar expressions concerning university-based information systems research. Moreover, they appear to be consistent with assessments and impressions sensed by many persons conducting information systems research from an academic home base. Judging from the apparent frequency and consistency of these judgments, it is evident that a sizeable portion of the practitioner community does not value the research conducted by information systems IS scholars. This paper explores the challenge of relating IS research to practice. It suggests alternatives for researchers to consider if they seek an impact on practice and an ongoing communication link with practitioners.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将信息系统研究与实践联系起来的挑战
“学术界正在慢慢跟进。”“这篇文章没有相关性、可及性或可读性。”“如果他们从来没有亲自做过,他们怎么可能给别人提建议呢?”“如果我想知道什么有效,或者什么正在尝试,我会拿起电话,联系其他公司的同事……除了少数例外,IS学术界对此毫无头绪。”这些,以及其他大量由大公司的首席信息官提出的高度批评的评论,都是在与信息技术专业人员进行结构化访谈的过程中被捕获的,这些信息技术专业人员参与了一个研究项目,目前正在进行过程1 (Senn, 1997)。它们是许多关于大学信息系统研究的类似表达的代表。此外,它们似乎与许多在学术基地从事信息系统研究的人所感受到的评价和印象是一致的。从这些判断的明显频率和一致性来看,很明显,相当大一部分从业者社区并不重视信息系统is学者所进行的研究。本文探讨了将信息系统研究与实践联系起来的挑战。如果研究人员寻求对实践的影响和与从业者的持续沟通联系,它建议他们考虑其他选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
The change process questionnaire (CPQ): A psychometric validation. Differential Costs of Raising Grandchildren on Older Mother-Adult Child Relations in Black and White Families. Does Resilience Mediate the Relationship Between Negative Self-Image and Psychological Distress in Middle-Aged and Older Gay and Bisexual Men? Intergenerational Relations and Well-being Among Older Middle Eastern/Arab American Immigrants During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Caregiving Appraisals and Emotional Valence: Moderating Effects of Activity Participation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1