Systems Analysts' Attitudes Toward Information Systems Development

IF 1.1 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Information Resources Management Journal Pub Date : 1998-09-01 DOI:10.4018/IRMJ.1998100101
James J. Jiang, G. Klein, J. Balloun
{"title":"Systems Analysts' Attitudes Toward Information Systems Development","authors":"James J. Jiang, G. Klein, J. Balloun","doi":"10.4018/IRMJ.1998100101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Certain researchers argue that systems analysts are too technical, a situation that may contribute to system failures. The results of this study, however, contradict this argument. By applying a framework of Dos Santos and Hawk 1988, analysts were found to have three primary orientations: technical, socio-political, and user. No one orientation dominated. Using the framework applied in this study, managers can consider the analysts' orientations in assigning development activities. Researchers can identify diverse orientations in future studies where attitudes may be significant predictors of system performance or development success.","PeriodicalId":44735,"journal":{"name":"Information Resources Management Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":"5-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"1998-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Resources Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IRMJ.1998100101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Certain researchers argue that systems analysts are too technical, a situation that may contribute to system failures. The results of this study, however, contradict this argument. By applying a framework of Dos Santos and Hawk 1988, analysts were found to have three primary orientations: technical, socio-political, and user. No one orientation dominated. Using the framework applied in this study, managers can consider the analysts' orientations in assigning development activities. Researchers can identify diverse orientations in future studies where attitudes may be significant predictors of system performance or development success.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统分析师对信息系统开发的态度
某些研究人员认为,系统分析师过于技术化,这种情况可能会导致系统故障。然而,这项研究的结果却反驳了这一观点。通过应用Dos Santos和Hawk 1988的框架,分析人员发现有三个主要方向:技术、社会政治和用户。没有哪个方向占主导地位。使用本研究中应用的框架,管理人员可以在分配开发活动时考虑分析师的取向。研究人员可以在未来的研究中确定不同的方向,其中态度可能是系统性能或开发成功的重要预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Information Resources Management Journal
Information Resources Management Journal INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Topics should be drawn from, but not limited to, the following areas, with major emphasis on the managerial and organizational aspects of information resource and technology management: •Application of IT to operation •Artificial intelligence and expert systems technologies and issues •Business process management and modeling •Data warehousing and mining •Database management technologies and issues •Decision support and group decision support systems •Distance learning technologies and issues •Distributed software development •E-collaboration •Electronic commerce technologies and issues •Electronic government •Emerging technologies management
期刊最新文献
The Control of Civil Engineering Projects Based on Deep Learning and Building Information Modeling Rational or Emotional User Risk and Revenue Management in the Chinese Auto Loan Industry The Role Of Big Data In The Formation Of Supply Chain Platforms For New Forms Of Online Retail The Role of Information Systems And Organizational Communication Culture In Transforming A Business Function
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1