Characterizing the Suture Pullout Force for Human Small Bowel.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1115/1.4063951
Alex T Gong, Shi-Wen Olivia Yau, Hans B Erickson, Rudolph J Toepfer, Jessica Zhang, Aleah M Deschmidt, Conner J Parsey, Jack E Norfleet, Robert M Sweet
{"title":"Characterizing the Suture Pullout Force for Human Small Bowel.","authors":"Alex T Gong, Shi-Wen Olivia Yau, Hans B Erickson, Rudolph J Toepfer, Jessica Zhang, Aleah M Deschmidt, Conner J Parsey, Jack E Norfleet, Robert M Sweet","doi":"10.1115/1.4063951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Performing a small bowel anastomosis, or reconnecting small bowel segments, remains a core competency and critical step for the successful surgical management of numerous bowel and urinary conditions. As surgical education and technology moves toward improving patient outcomes through automation and increasing training opportunities, a detailed characterization of the interventional biomechanical properties of the human bowel is important. This is especially true due to the prevalence of anastomotic leakage as a frequent (3.02%) postoperative complication of small bowel anastomoses. This study aims to characterize the forces required for a suture to tear through human small bowel (suture pullout force, SPOF), while analyzing how these forces are affected by tissue orientation, suture material, suture size, and donor demographics. 803 tests were performed on 35 human small bowel specimens. A uni-axial test frame was used to tension sutures looped through 10 × 20 mm rectangular bowel samples to tissue failure. The mean SPOF of the small bowel was 4.62±1.40 N. We found no significant effect of tissue orientation (p = 0.083), suture material (p = 0.681), suture size (p = 0.131), age (p = 0.158), sex (p = .083), or body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.100) on SPOF. To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting human small bowel SPOF. Little research has been published about procedure-specific data on human small bowel. Filling this gap in research will inform the design of more accurate human bowel synthetic models and provide an accurate baseline for training and clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":54871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063951","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Performing a small bowel anastomosis, or reconnecting small bowel segments, remains a core competency and critical step for the successful surgical management of numerous bowel and urinary conditions. As surgical education and technology moves toward improving patient outcomes through automation and increasing training opportunities, a detailed characterization of the interventional biomechanical properties of the human bowel is important. This is especially true due to the prevalence of anastomotic leakage as a frequent (3.02%) postoperative complication of small bowel anastomoses. This study aims to characterize the forces required for a suture to tear through human small bowel (suture pullout force, SPOF), while analyzing how these forces are affected by tissue orientation, suture material, suture size, and donor demographics. 803 tests were performed on 35 human small bowel specimens. A uni-axial test frame was used to tension sutures looped through 10 × 20 mm rectangular bowel samples to tissue failure. The mean SPOF of the small bowel was 4.62±1.40 N. We found no significant effect of tissue orientation (p = 0.083), suture material (p = 0.681), suture size (p = 0.131), age (p = 0.158), sex (p = .083), or body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.100) on SPOF. To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting human small bowel SPOF. Little research has been published about procedure-specific data on human small bowel. Filling this gap in research will inform the design of more accurate human bowel synthetic models and provide an accurate baseline for training and clinical applications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人体小肠缝线拔出力的表征。
进行小肠吻合或重新连接小肠段,仍然是成功手术治疗多种肠道和泌尿系统疾病的核心能力和关键步骤。随着外科教育和技术朝着通过自动化和增加培训机会来改善患者预后的方向发展,详细描述人类肠道的介入生物力学特性是很重要的。吻合口瘘是小肠吻合术后常见的并发症(3.02%),因此吻合口瘘的发生率尤其高。本研究旨在描述缝合线撕裂人类小肠所需的力(缝合线拔出力,SPOF),同时分析这些力如何受到组织方向、缝合线材料、缝合线尺寸和供体人口统计的影响。对35个人类小肠标本进行了803次检测。使用单轴测试框架将穿过10 x 20 mm矩形肠道样本的缝合线拉紧至组织失效。小肠的平均SPOF为4.62+/-1.40 N。我们发现组织方向(p=0.083)、缝线材料(p=0.681)、缝线尺寸(p=0.131)、年龄(p=0.158)、性别(p=.083)或BMI(p=0.100)对SPOF没有显著影响。据我们所知,这是第一项报告人类小肠SPOF的研究。关于人类小肠的特定程序数据,很少有研究发表。填补这一研究空白将为设计更准确的人类肠道合成模型提供信息,并为训练和临床应用提供准确的基线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs and Prostheses; Bioinstrumentation and Measurements; Bioheat Transfer; Biomaterials; Biomechanics; Bioprocess Engineering; Cellular Mechanics; Design and Control of Biological Systems; Physiological Systems.
期刊最新文献
Image-Based Estimation of Left Ventricular Myocardial Stiffness. Phenomenological Muscle Constitutive Model With Actin-Titin Binding for Simulating Active Stretching. Regulatory Role of Collagen XI in the Establishment of Mechanical Properties of Tendons and Ligaments in Mice Is Tissue Dependent. Study of the Mechanism of Perceived Rotational Acceleration of a Bionic Semicircular Canal on the Basis of the "Circular Geometry Hypothesis". Walking Slope and Heavy Backpacks Affect Peak and Impulsive Lumbar Joint Contact Forces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1