Forging a cohesive path: Integrating life cycle assessments of primary-origin phosphorus fertilizer production and secondary-origin recovery from municipal wastewater
L. Manoukian , G.S. Metson , E. Martín Hernández , C. Vaneeckhaute , D. Frigon , S. Omelon
{"title":"Forging a cohesive path: Integrating life cycle assessments of primary-origin phosphorus fertilizer production and secondary-origin recovery from municipal wastewater","authors":"L. Manoukian , G.S. Metson , E. Martín Hernández , C. Vaneeckhaute , D. Frigon , S. Omelon","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>Phosphorus (P) is an essential agricultural nutrient and its production as mineral P fertilizers from phosphate rock is well established. An alternative method involves recovering P from municipal </span>wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) for reuse as fertilizer. </span>Life cycle analysis<span> (LCA) studies have been conducted to assess the environmental impacts associated with both processes. However, systematic comparisons of mineral and recovered P fertilizer production processes are scarce in the existing literature. In this review, we examine the goals, functional units, impact categories, and system boundaries of peer-reviewed LCAs for mineral P fertilizer production (</span></span><em>n</em> = 5), recovered P fertilizer production (<em>n</em> = 14), or both (<em>n</em><span><span> = 5). To enhance the overall impact and usefulness of these studies for policymaking, we propose a standardized approach for comparative P process studies, while emphasizing the need for simultaneously assessing the environmental effects of P fertilizer production and P recovery from WWTPs. We recommend including key impact categories that are relevant to both processes, such as eutrophication, acidification, </span>global warming potential<span>, soil and water pollution, resource use, and toxicity. Furthermore, adopting a functional unit of one kilogram of elemental P would facilitate better comparisons between LCAs. We also recommend standardized system boundaries that encompass the key aspects of each process.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 107260"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344923003944","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Phosphorus (P) is an essential agricultural nutrient and its production as mineral P fertilizers from phosphate rock is well established. An alternative method involves recovering P from municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) for reuse as fertilizer. Life cycle analysis (LCA) studies have been conducted to assess the environmental impacts associated with both processes. However, systematic comparisons of mineral and recovered P fertilizer production processes are scarce in the existing literature. In this review, we examine the goals, functional units, impact categories, and system boundaries of peer-reviewed LCAs for mineral P fertilizer production (n = 5), recovered P fertilizer production (n = 14), or both (n = 5). To enhance the overall impact and usefulness of these studies for policymaking, we propose a standardized approach for comparative P process studies, while emphasizing the need for simultaneously assessing the environmental effects of P fertilizer production and P recovery from WWTPs. We recommend including key impact categories that are relevant to both processes, such as eutrophication, acidification, global warming potential, soil and water pollution, resource use, and toxicity. Furthermore, adopting a functional unit of one kilogram of elemental P would facilitate better comparisons between LCAs. We also recommend standardized system boundaries that encompass the key aspects of each process.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.