Retaplase plus abciximab improves non-fatal outcomes, but not overall survival in people with diabetes and acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Victor Serebruany MD, PhD (Commentary Author)
{"title":"Retaplase plus abciximab improves non-fatal outcomes, but not overall survival in people with diabetes and acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction","authors":"Victor Serebruany MD, PhD (Commentary Author)","doi":"10.1016/j.ehbc.2004.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>In people with diabetes and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, is half-dose reteplase plus abciximab more effective than reteplase alone?</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Secondary analysis of multicentre randomised controlled trial.</p></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><p>For mortality at 30 days or 1 year, there was no significant difference between groups (see Table 1). Reteplase plus abciximab significantly reduced the risk of reinfarction, or recurrent ischaemia or angina compared with reteplase alone.<span><div><div><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>Table 1</strong> Clinical outcomes for people with diabetes and ST-segment myocardial infarction.</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Reteplase alone (<em>n</em>=1299)</td><td>Half-dose reteplase plus abciximab (<em>n</em>=1334)</td><td><em>P</em> value</td></tr><tr><td>Death within 30 days</td><td>8.8%</td><td>8.2%</td><td>0.57</td></tr><tr><td>Death within 1 year</td><td>13.0%</td><td>12.4%</td><td>0.64</td></tr><tr><td>Reinfarction</td><td>4.3%</td><td>2.5%</td><td>0.01</td></tr><tr><td>Recurrent ischaemia/angina</td><td>14.9%</td><td>11.8%</td><td>0.01</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div></span></p></div><div><h3>Authors’ conclusions</h3><p>Although treatment with reteplase plus abciximab did not provide a survival benefit for people with diabetes and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction compared with reteplase alone, nonfatal outcomes including reinfarction and recurrent ischaemia were substantially reduced.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100512,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based Healthcare","volume":"8 4","pages":"Pages 230-231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehbc.2004.05.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462941004000816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Question

In people with diabetes and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, is half-dose reteplase plus abciximab more effective than reteplase alone?

Study design

Secondary analysis of multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Main results

For mortality at 30 days or 1 year, there was no significant difference between groups (see Table 1). Reteplase plus abciximab significantly reduced the risk of reinfarction, or recurrent ischaemia or angina compared with reteplase alone.

Table 1 Clinical outcomes for people with diabetes and ST-segment myocardial infarction.
Reteplase alone (n=1299)Half-dose reteplase plus abciximab (n=1334)P value
Death within 30 days8.8%8.2%0.57
Death within 1 year13.0%12.4%0.64
Reinfarction4.3%2.5%0.01
Recurrent ischaemia/angina14.9%11.8%0.01

Authors’ conclusions

Although treatment with reteplase plus abciximab did not provide a survival benefit for people with diabetes and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction compared with reteplase alone, nonfatal outcomes including reinfarction and recurrent ischaemia were substantially reduced.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Retaplase + abciximab可改善糖尿病合并急性st段抬高型心肌梗死患者的非致命性预后,但不能改善总生存率
问题在糖尿病和ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,半剂量的雷普酶加阿昔单抗是否比单独使用雷普酶更有效?研究设计多中心随机对照试验的二次分析。主要结果对于30天或1年的死亡率,各组之间没有显著差异(见表1)。与单独使用瑞替普酶相比,瑞替普蛋白酶联合阿昔单抗显著降低了再梗死、复发性缺血或心绞痛的风险。表1糖尿病和ST段心肌梗死患者的临床结果。单独使用雷普酶(n=1299)半剂量雷普酶加阿昔单抗(n=1334)P值30天内死亡8.8%8.2%0.57 1年内死亡13.0%12.4%0.64再梗死4.3%2.5%0.01复发性缺血/血管痉挛14.9%11.8%0.01作者的结论尽管与单独使用瑞替普酶,包括再梗死和复发性缺血在内的非致命性结果显著降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High-quality nutrition counselling for hypercholesterolemia by public health nurses in rural areas does not affect total blood cholesterol No association between mobile phone usage and development of acoustic neuroma Retaplase plus abciximab improves non-fatal outcomes, but not overall survival in people with diabetes and acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction Intravenous magnesium sulphate does not improve survival or disability outcomes in people with stroke Rate of major complications is higher in laparoscopic than abdominal hysterectomy but quality of life improves with both procedures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1