Retaplase plus abciximab improves non-fatal outcomes, but not overall survival in people with diabetes and acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
{"title":"Retaplase plus abciximab improves non-fatal outcomes, but not overall survival in people with diabetes and acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction","authors":"Victor Serebruany MD, PhD (Commentary Author)","doi":"10.1016/j.ehbc.2004.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>In people with diabetes and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, is half-dose reteplase plus abciximab more effective than reteplase alone?</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Secondary analysis of multicentre randomised controlled trial.</p></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><p>For mortality at 30 days or 1 year, there was no significant difference between groups (see Table 1). Reteplase plus abciximab significantly reduced the risk of reinfarction, or recurrent ischaemia or angina compared with reteplase alone.<span><div><div><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>Table 1</strong> Clinical outcomes for people with diabetes and ST-segment myocardial infarction.</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Reteplase alone (<em>n</em>=1299)</td><td>Half-dose reteplase plus abciximab (<em>n</em>=1334)</td><td><em>P</em> value</td></tr><tr><td>Death within 30 days</td><td>8.8%</td><td>8.2%</td><td>0.57</td></tr><tr><td>Death within 1 year</td><td>13.0%</td><td>12.4%</td><td>0.64</td></tr><tr><td>Reinfarction</td><td>4.3%</td><td>2.5%</td><td>0.01</td></tr><tr><td>Recurrent ischaemia/angina</td><td>14.9%</td><td>11.8%</td><td>0.01</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div></span></p></div><div><h3>Authors’ conclusions</h3><p>Although treatment with reteplase plus abciximab did not provide a survival benefit for people with diabetes and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction compared with reteplase alone, nonfatal outcomes including reinfarction and recurrent ischaemia were substantially reduced.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100512,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based Healthcare","volume":"8 4","pages":"Pages 230-231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehbc.2004.05.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462941004000816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Question
In people with diabetes and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, is half-dose reteplase plus abciximab more effective than reteplase alone?
Study design
Secondary analysis of multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Main results
For mortality at 30 days or 1 year, there was no significant difference between groups (see Table 1). Reteplase plus abciximab significantly reduced the risk of reinfarction, or recurrent ischaemia or angina compared with reteplase alone.
Table 1 Clinical outcomes for people with diabetes and ST-segment myocardial infarction.
Reteplase alone (n=1299)
Half-dose reteplase plus abciximab (n=1334)
P value
Death within 30 days
8.8%
8.2%
0.57
Death within 1 year
13.0%
12.4%
0.64
Reinfarction
4.3%
2.5%
0.01
Recurrent ischaemia/angina
14.9%
11.8%
0.01
Authors’ conclusions
Although treatment with reteplase plus abciximab did not provide a survival benefit for people with diabetes and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction compared with reteplase alone, nonfatal outcomes including reinfarction and recurrent ischaemia were substantially reduced.