Length of hospital stay for elderly people is substantially higher in the NHS compared with Kaiser Permanente and US Medicare programmes

David P Sklar MD (Commentary Author)
{"title":"Length of hospital stay for elderly people is substantially higher in the NHS compared with Kaiser Permanente and US Medicare programmes","authors":"David P Sklar MD (Commentary Author)","doi":"10.1016/j.ehbc.2004.03.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>Does utilization of hospital beds by people aged over 65 years differ in the NHS in England, Kaiser Permanente in California and Medicare in California and the USA?</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>Retrospective cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><p>For all 11 causes of hospital admissions, standardised length of hospital stay for people aged &gt;65 years was highest in the NHS (3.5 times as long as Kaiser, twice as long as Medicare California, and nearly 50% higher than Medicare in the United States). Standardised hospital admission rates for 11 leading causes of hospital admissions in people aged &gt;65 years are generally highest for Medicare recipients in the United States and California, followed by the NHS in England and then Kaiser Permanente in California (see Table 1). However, there are important limitations to the reliability of these findings (see notes).</p></div><div><h3>Authors’ conclusions</h3><p>For 11 leading causes of acute hospital admissions in people aged &gt;65 years, the NHS has generally lower hospital admission rates and longer hospital stays compared with Medicare recipients in the United States and California, and Kaiser Permanente in California.<span><div><div><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>Table 1</strong> Number of hospital admissions (per 100,000 population) and length of stay (days) in people aged &gt;65 years, standardised for English population data.</td></tr><tr><td>Clinical Diagnosis</td><td>NHS</td><td>Kaiser</td><td>Medicare California</td><td>Medicare United States</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Admissions</td><td>Stay</td><td>Admissions</td><td>Stay</td><td>Admissions</td><td>Stay</td><td>Admissions</td><td>Stay</td></tr><tr><td>Stroke</td><td>823</td><td>27.08</td><td>788</td><td>4.26</td><td>1155</td><td>5.84</td><td>1183</td><td>6.53</td></tr><tr><td>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</td><td>699</td><td>9.87</td><td>558</td><td>3.79</td><td>1067</td><td>5.35</td><td>1256</td><td>5.37</td></tr><tr><td>Bronchitis or asthma</td><td>531</td><td>11.73</td><td>141</td><td>3.09</td><td>225</td><td>4.22</td><td>310</td><td>4.41</td></tr><tr><td>Coronary bypass</td><td>144</td><td>13.27</td><td>97</td><td>9.60</td><td>296</td><td>8.63</td><td>321</td><td>9.98</td></tr><tr><td>Acute myocardial infarction</td><td>550</td><td>9.39</td><td>893</td><td>4.35</td><td>675</td><td>5.14</td><td>923</td><td>5.46</td></tr><tr><td>Heart failure/shock</td><td>556</td><td>12.42</td><td>1118</td><td>3.70</td><td>1893</td><td>5.28</td><td>2272</td><td>5.37</td></tr><tr><td>Angina pectoris</td><td>783</td><td>5.88</td><td>152</td><td>2.21</td><td>176</td><td>2.58</td><td>203</td><td>2.56</td></tr><tr><td>Hip replacement</td><td>342</td><td>12.60</td><td>256</td><td>4.54</td><td>602</td><td>5.41</td><td>644</td><td>5.46</td></tr><tr><td>Knee replacement</td><td>344</td><td>11.32</td><td>367</td><td>4.17</td><td>479</td><td>4.54</td><td>557</td><td>4.40</td></tr><tr><td>Hip fracture</td><td>315</td><td>26.88</td><td>388</td><td>4.89</td><td>489</td><td>5.97</td><td>535</td><td>6.47</td></tr><tr><td>Kidney or urinary infection</td><td>396</td><td>15.19</td><td>526</td><td>3.80</td><td>726</td><td>5.11</td><td>708</td><td>5.32</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":100512,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based Healthcare","volume":"8 3","pages":"Pages 113-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehbc.2004.03.016","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462941004000518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Question

Does utilization of hospital beds by people aged over 65 years differ in the NHS in England, Kaiser Permanente in California and Medicare in California and the USA?

Study Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Main results

For all 11 causes of hospital admissions, standardised length of hospital stay for people aged >65 years was highest in the NHS (3.5 times as long as Kaiser, twice as long as Medicare California, and nearly 50% higher than Medicare in the United States). Standardised hospital admission rates for 11 leading causes of hospital admissions in people aged >65 years are generally highest for Medicare recipients in the United States and California, followed by the NHS in England and then Kaiser Permanente in California (see Table 1). However, there are important limitations to the reliability of these findings (see notes).

Authors’ conclusions

For 11 leading causes of acute hospital admissions in people aged >65 years, the NHS has generally lower hospital admission rates and longer hospital stays compared with Medicare recipients in the United States and California, and Kaiser Permanente in California.

Table 1 Number of hospital admissions (per 100,000 population) and length of stay (days) in people aged >65 years, standardised for English population data.
Clinical DiagnosisNHSKaiserMedicare CaliforniaMedicare United States
AdmissionsStayAdmissionsStayAdmissionsStayAdmissionsStay
Stroke82327.087884.2611555.8411836.53
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6999.875583.7910675.3512565.37
Bronchitis or asthma53111.731413.092254.223104.41
Coronary bypass14413.27979.602968.633219.98
Acute myocardial infarction5509.398934.356755.149235.46
Heart failure/shock55612.4211183.7018935.2822725.37
Angina pectoris7835.881522.211762.582032.56
Hip replacement34212.602564.546025.416445.46
Knee replacement34411.323674.174794.545574.40
Hip fracture31526.883884.894895.975356.47
Kidney or urinary infection39615.195263.807265.117085.32

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与Kaiser Permanente和美国医疗保险计划相比,NHS中老年人的住院时间要长得多
问题在英国的NHS、加利福尼亚州的Kaiser Permanente以及加利福尼亚州和美国的Medicare中,65岁以上的人对病床的使用情况是否不同?研究设计回顾性队列研究。主要结果对于所有11种入院原因,年龄>;65岁是NHS中年龄最高的(是凯撒的3.5倍,是加州医疗保险的两倍,比美国医疗保险高出近50%)。年龄>;65岁通常是美国和加利福尼亚州医疗保险受益人的最高年龄,其次是英国的NHS,然后是加利福尼亚州的Kaiser Permanente(见表1)。然而,这些发现的可靠性有很大的局限性(见注释)。作者的结论对于年龄>;65年来,与美国和加利福尼亚州的医疗保险受益人以及加利福尼亚州的Kaiser Permanente相比,NHS的住院率通常较低,住院时间更长。表1年龄>;65岁,英国人口数据标准化。临床诊断NHSKaiser医疗保险加州医疗保险美国住院住院住院住院入院住院住院住院中风82327.087884.2611555.8411836.53慢性阻塞性肺病6999.875583.7910675.3512565.37支气管炎或哮喘53111.731413.092254.223104.41冠状动脉旁路14413.27979.602968.633219.98急性心肌梗死5509.398934.356755.149235.46心脏失败/休克55612.4211183.7018935.2822725.37发动机检查835.881522.211762.582032.56髋关节置换34212.602564.546025.416445.46膝关节置换34411.323674.174794.545574.40髋关节骨折31526.883884.8948959.75356.47肾脏或泌尿系统感染39615.195263.807265.117085.32
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High-quality nutrition counselling for hypercholesterolemia by public health nurses in rural areas does not affect total blood cholesterol No association between mobile phone usage and development of acoustic neuroma Retaplase plus abciximab improves non-fatal outcomes, but not overall survival in people with diabetes and acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction Intravenous magnesium sulphate does not improve survival or disability outcomes in people with stroke Rate of major complications is higher in laparoscopic than abdominal hysterectomy but quality of life improves with both procedures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1