Treatment of unilateral visual impairment in preschool children modestly improves visual acuity

Maria S Castanes MPH (Commentary Author)
{"title":"Treatment of unilateral visual impairment in preschool children modestly improves visual acuity","authors":"Maria S Castanes MPH (Commentary Author)","doi":"10.1016/j.ehbc.2004.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>How effective is treatment for unilateral visual impairment detected by preschool vision screening?</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Multicentre randomised controlled trial.</p></div><div><h3>Main Results</h3><p>Glasses plus patch treatment slightly but significantly improved visual acuity (both uncorrected and best corrected) compared with no treatment in children with mild to moderate unilateral visual impairment at 52 weeks (see Table 1; see notes). Glasses alone modestly improved best corrected visual acuity compared with no treatment; however there was no significant difference in uncorrected visual acuity between these groups.<span><div><div><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>Table 1</strong> LogMAR visual acuity scores by treatment group at 52 weeks.</td></tr><tr><td>Visual acuity</td><td>No treatment</td><td>Glasses alone</td><td>Glasses plus Patch</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Mean logMAR</td><td>Mean logMAR</td><td>Mean difference (95% CI) from no treatment</td><td>Mean logMAR</td><td>Mean difference (95% CI) from no treatment</td></tr><tr><td>Uncorrected</td><td>0.424</td><td>0.381</td><td>0.043 (-0.05 to 0.013)</td><td>0.336</td><td>0.088 (0.01 to 0.17)</td></tr><tr><td>Best corrected</td><td>0.301</td><td>0.216</td><td>0.085 (0.02 to 0.15)</td><td>0.193</td><td>0.109 (0.05 to 0.17)</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div></span></p></div><div><h3>Authors’ conclusions</h3><p>Treatment with glasses alone or in combination with patches can modestly improve visual acuity in children with mild to moderate unilateral visual impairment, compared with no treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100512,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based Healthcare","volume":"8 3","pages":"Pages 174-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehbc.2004.03.002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462941004000373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Question

How effective is treatment for unilateral visual impairment detected by preschool vision screening?

Study design

Multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Main Results

Glasses plus patch treatment slightly but significantly improved visual acuity (both uncorrected and best corrected) compared with no treatment in children with mild to moderate unilateral visual impairment at 52 weeks (see Table 1; see notes). Glasses alone modestly improved best corrected visual acuity compared with no treatment; however there was no significant difference in uncorrected visual acuity between these groups.

Table 1 LogMAR visual acuity scores by treatment group at 52 weeks.
Visual acuityNo treatmentGlasses aloneGlasses plus Patch
Mean logMARMean logMARMean difference (95% CI) from no treatmentMean logMARMean difference (95% CI) from no treatment
Uncorrected0.4240.3810.043 (-0.05 to 0.013)0.3360.088 (0.01 to 0.17)
Best corrected0.3010.2160.085 (0.02 to 0.15)0.1930.109 (0.05 to 0.17)

Authors’ conclusions

Treatment with glasses alone or in combination with patches can modestly improve visual acuity in children with mild to moderate unilateral visual impairment, compared with no treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学龄前儿童单侧视力障碍的治疗可适度改善视力
问题学前视力筛查发现的单侧视觉障碍的治疗效果如何?研究设计多中心随机对照试验。主要结果在52周时,轻度至中度单侧视觉障碍儿童接受眼镜加贴片治疗,与未接受治疗相比,视力略有但显著提高(包括未矫正和最佳矫正)(见表1;见注释)。与不治疗相比,单独使用眼镜可以适度提高最佳矫正视力;但两组的裸眼视力无显著差异。表1治疗组在52周时的LogMAR视力评分。视力无治疗单独使用眼镜加贴片平均值logMAR平均值logMar无治疗的平均差异(95%可信区间)平均值logmar无治疗的差异(95%置信区间)未校正0.4240.3810.043(-0.05至0.013)0.3360.088(0.01至0.17)最佳校正0.3010.2160.085(0.02至0.15)0.1930.109(0.05至0.17与不治疗相比,轻度至中度单侧视觉障碍儿童的视力略有改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High-quality nutrition counselling for hypercholesterolemia by public health nurses in rural areas does not affect total blood cholesterol No association between mobile phone usage and development of acoustic neuroma Retaplase plus abciximab improves non-fatal outcomes, but not overall survival in people with diabetes and acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction Intravenous magnesium sulphate does not improve survival or disability outcomes in people with stroke Rate of major complications is higher in laparoscopic than abdominal hysterectomy but quality of life improves with both procedures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1