STRATEGIC DIVERGENCE IN THE US-PAKISTAN RELATIONSHIP UNDER THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION

IF 0.3 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Sodobna Pedagogika-Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies Pub Date : 2023-02-28 DOI:10.54690/jcs.v11i2.232
Y. Malik, Saira Aquil
{"title":"STRATEGIC DIVERGENCE IN THE US-PAKISTAN RELATIONSHIP UNDER THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION","authors":"Y. Malik, Saira Aquil","doi":"10.54690/jcs.v11i2.232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyses the US-Pakistan relationship during the Trump administration from a neo-classical realist lens. Along with systemic influences, the analysis framework also includes the role of domestic and cognitive factors in understanding both sides’ perceptions, behaviors, and preferences toward each other. During Trump’s presidential term, both sides could not fritter away the mistrust and move beyond the traditional course of engagement characterized by tactical convergence based on the rewards for service rendered by Pakistan. Pakistan was not a strategic choice for Washington since the two countries had contrasting expectations on evolving global developments, emerging regional geo-political and domestic reconfigurations. Parallel to this, Pakistan’s economic vulnerabilities were exploited by the Republicans to reassert their leverage in bargaining. This grey area helped the White House allure Pakistan with its carrot-and-stick approach and compelled policy planners in Islamabad to think that a strong foreign policy always rests on a strong domestic base.","PeriodicalId":41210,"journal":{"name":"Sodobna Pedagogika-Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies","volume":"9 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sodobna Pedagogika-Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54690/jcs.v11i2.232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study analyses the US-Pakistan relationship during the Trump administration from a neo-classical realist lens. Along with systemic influences, the analysis framework also includes the role of domestic and cognitive factors in understanding both sides’ perceptions, behaviors, and preferences toward each other. During Trump’s presidential term, both sides could not fritter away the mistrust and move beyond the traditional course of engagement characterized by tactical convergence based on the rewards for service rendered by Pakistan. Pakistan was not a strategic choice for Washington since the two countries had contrasting expectations on evolving global developments, emerging regional geo-political and domestic reconfigurations. Parallel to this, Pakistan’s economic vulnerabilities were exploited by the Republicans to reassert their leverage in bargaining. This grey area helped the White House allure Pakistan with its carrot-and-stick approach and compelled policy planners in Islamabad to think that a strong foreign policy always rests on a strong domestic base.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特朗普政府下美巴关系的战略分歧
本研究从新古典现实主义视角分析了特朗普执政期间的美巴关系。除了系统影响外,分析框架还包括国内因素和认知因素在理解双方的看法、行为和对彼此的偏好方面的作用。在特朗普的总统任期内,双方无法消磨这种不信任,也无法超越传统的接触路线,其特点是基于巴基斯坦提供的服务的回报,在战术上趋同。巴基斯坦不是华盛顿的战略选择,因为两国对不断变化的全球事态发展、正在出现的地区地缘政治和国内重组有着截然不同的期望。与此同时,共和党人利用巴基斯坦的经济脆弱性来重申他们在谈判中的筹码。这一灰色地带帮助白宫用胡萝卜加大棒的方式吸引巴基斯坦,并迫使伊斯兰堡的政策规划者认为,强大的外交政策总是建立在强大的国内基础之上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Sodobna pedagogika pokriva področje pedagogike, vzgoje in izobraževanja ter z njimi povezana področja. Posebno pozornost namenja raziskavam in analizam aktualnih problemov vzgoje in izobraževanja, kjer spodbuja različne perspektive in akademsko-polemične pristope. Sodobna pedagogika svojega fokusa ne omejuje zgolj na določen segment znotraj vzgoje in izobraževanja. Prispevki, ki jih objavlja, se ukvarjajo z vprašanji in problemi šolskih sistemov, šolskih politik, šolske organizacije in vodenja, prav tako pa tudi z vzgojnimi in izobraževalnimi procesi ter statusom učiteljev, staršev in učencev ter odnosi med njimi. Revija je odprta tudi za posredovanje izkušenj pedagoških delavcev-praktikov najrazličnejših profilov: osnovnošolskih in srednješolskih učiteljev, ravnateljev, vzgojiteljev, pedagoških vodij, svetovalnih delavcev in drugih.
期刊最新文献
Aid, Politics and the War of Narratives in the US-Pakistan Relations - A Case Study of Kerry Lugar Berman Act STRATEGIC DIVERGENCE IN THE US-PAKISTAN RELATIONSHIP UNDER THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION Global Pakistan: Pakistan’s Role in the International System DECOLONIAL TURN: NEW CHALLENGES TO INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS TRADITIONS The New Climate War: The Fight to Take Back Our Planet
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1