Least fixpoint approximations for reachability analysis

In-Ho Moon, J. Kukula, T. Shiple, F. Somenzi
{"title":"Least fixpoint approximations for reachability analysis","authors":"In-Ho Moon, J. Kukula, T. Shiple, F. Somenzi","doi":"10.1109/ICCAD.1999.810618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The knowledge of the reachable states of a sequential circuit can dramatically speed up optimization and model checking. However, since exact reachability analysis may be intractable, approximate techniques are often preferable. H. Cho et al. (1996) presented the machine-by-machine (MBM) and frame-by-frame (FBF) methods to perform approximate finite state machine (FSM) traversal. FBF produces tighter upper bounds than MBM; however, it usually takes much more time and it may have convergence problems. In this paper, we show that there exists a class of methods-least fixpoint approximations-that compute the same results as RFBF (\"reached FBF\", one of the FBF methods). We show that one member of this class, which we call \"least fixpoint MBM\" (LMBM), is as efficient as MBM, but provably more accurate. Therefore, the trade-off that existed between MBM and RFBF has been eliminated. LMBM can compute RFBF-quality approximations for all the large ISCAS-89 benchmark circuits in a total of less than 9000 seconds.","PeriodicalId":6414,"journal":{"name":"1999 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design. Digest of Technical Papers (Cat. No.99CH37051)","volume":"77 8","pages":"41-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1999 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design. Digest of Technical Papers (Cat. No.99CH37051)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAD.1999.810618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

The knowledge of the reachable states of a sequential circuit can dramatically speed up optimization and model checking. However, since exact reachability analysis may be intractable, approximate techniques are often preferable. H. Cho et al. (1996) presented the machine-by-machine (MBM) and frame-by-frame (FBF) methods to perform approximate finite state machine (FSM) traversal. FBF produces tighter upper bounds than MBM; however, it usually takes much more time and it may have convergence problems. In this paper, we show that there exists a class of methods-least fixpoint approximations-that compute the same results as RFBF ("reached FBF", one of the FBF methods). We show that one member of this class, which we call "least fixpoint MBM" (LMBM), is as efficient as MBM, but provably more accurate. Therefore, the trade-off that existed between MBM and RFBF has been eliminated. LMBM can compute RFBF-quality approximations for all the large ISCAS-89 benchmark circuits in a total of less than 9000 seconds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可达性分析的最小不动点近似
时序电路可达状态的知识可以大大加快优化和模型检查的速度。然而,由于精确的可达性分析可能难以处理,所以近似技术通常更可取。H. Cho等人(1996)提出了机器对机器(MBM)和帧对帧(FBF)方法来执行近似有限状态机(FSM)遍历。FBF比MBM产生更严格的上界;然而,它通常需要更多的时间,并且可能有收敛问题。在本文中,我们证明了存在一类方法-最小不动点逼近-计算出与RFBF相同的结果(“到达FBF”,FBF方法之一)。我们证明了这类中的一个成员,我们称之为“最小不动点MBM”(LMBM),它与MBM一样有效,但可以证明它更准确。因此,消除了MBM和RFBF之间存在的权衡关系。LMBM可以在不到9000秒的时间内计算出所有大型ISCAS-89基准电路的rbf质量近似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Least fixpoint approximations for reachability analysis Performance optimization using separator sets A scalable substrate noise coupling model for mixed-signal ICs JMTP: an architecture for exploiting concurrency in embedded Java applications with real-time considerations Electromagnetic parasitic extraction via a multipole method with hierarchical refinement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1