Russian Version of the Sources of Spirituality Scale

IF 0.6 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Kulturno-Istoricheskaya Psikhologiya-Cultural-Historical Psychology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17759/chp.2022180211
Российская Федерация
{"title":"Russian Version of the Sources of Spirituality Scale","authors":"Российская Федерация","doi":"10.17759/chp.2022180211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the results of development of the Russian version of Sources of Spirituality Scale (SOS-Ru scale) based on the SOS scale by Davis et al. for assessing spiritual experiences connected with different objects: Theistic, Transcendent, Human, Nature, Self. Approbation of the Russian version was realized in the sample comprising 412 participants (70% were women) at the age from 17 till 69 y.o. (M=26.8; SD=9.65) who completed online or pen-and-pencil survey. During analysis of validity, we used tests which assess religious spirituality, paranormal beliefs, global social identification, connectedness to nature, hedonism and eudemonia, moral foundations and subjective well-being. The results of CFA confirmed theoretical structure of the SOS-Ru scale. The reliability of subscales was high (0.73—0.95). Validity of subscales was confirmed by correlations with relevant indicators: the Theistic subscale showed the highest correlations with religious spirituality, the Human subscale was most related with global social identification, the Nature subscale was highly correlated with connectedness to nature. The subscales of the SOS-Ru scale showed expected correlations with eudemonia, moral foundations, paranormal beliefs and well-being. Using latent profile analysis we elicited groups with high, moderate, low levels of general spirituality and a group with secular spirituality. The data on gender differences and descriptive statistics which may be used as approximate statistical norms are presented.","PeriodicalId":44568,"journal":{"name":"Kulturno-Istoricheskaya Psikhologiya-Cultural-Historical Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kulturno-Istoricheskaya Psikhologiya-Cultural-Historical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2022180211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents the results of development of the Russian version of Sources of Spirituality Scale (SOS-Ru scale) based on the SOS scale by Davis et al. for assessing spiritual experiences connected with different objects: Theistic, Transcendent, Human, Nature, Self. Approbation of the Russian version was realized in the sample comprising 412 participants (70% were women) at the age from 17 till 69 y.o. (M=26.8; SD=9.65) who completed online or pen-and-pencil survey. During analysis of validity, we used tests which assess religious spirituality, paranormal beliefs, global social identification, connectedness to nature, hedonism and eudemonia, moral foundations and subjective well-being. The results of CFA confirmed theoretical structure of the SOS-Ru scale. The reliability of subscales was high (0.73—0.95). Validity of subscales was confirmed by correlations with relevant indicators: the Theistic subscale showed the highest correlations with religious spirituality, the Human subscale was most related with global social identification, the Nature subscale was highly correlated with connectedness to nature. The subscales of the SOS-Ru scale showed expected correlations with eudemonia, moral foundations, paranormal beliefs and well-being. Using latent profile analysis we elicited groups with high, moderate, low levels of general spirituality and a group with secular spirituality. The data on gender differences and descriptive statistics which may be used as approximate statistical norms are presented.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄罗斯版本的灵性来源量表
本文介绍了俄罗斯版灵性来源量表(SOS- ru量表)的开发结果,该量表基于戴维斯等人的SOS量表,用于评估与不同对象相关的精神体验:有神论,超验,人类,自然,自我。在17岁至69岁的412名参与者(70%为女性)的样本中实现了对俄语版本的认可(M=26.8;SD=9.65)。在效度分析中,我们使用了评估宗教灵性、超自然信仰、全球社会认同、与自然的联系、享乐主义和幸福、道德基础和主观幸福感的测试。CFA的结果证实了SOS-Ru量表的理论结构。量表信度较高(0.73-0.95)。各子量表与相关指标的相关性证实了其有效性:有神论子量表与宗教灵性的相关性最高,人类子量表与全球社会认同的相关性最高,自然子量表与自然联系的相关性最高。SOS-Ru量表的子量表与幸福、道德基础、超自然信仰和幸福感呈预期相关。使用潜在轮廓分析,我们引出了高、中、低一般灵性水平组和世俗灵性水平组。提出了关于性别差异的数据和可用作近似统计规范的描述性统计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Actor Training: Competencies or Aptitude Russian Version of the Sources of Spirituality Scale On the Problem of the Semantic Structure of Consciousness Development of Social and Psychological Readiness for Professional and Working Life in Students with Intellectual Disabilities Development of Formal-logical and Dialectical Thinking in Children of 5-8 Years Old
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1