An Intelligent Selection Model for Optimum Artificial Lift Method Using Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Approach

Abdelateef M. Adam, A. A. Mohamed Ali, Abdelaziz A. Elsadig, A. Ahmed
{"title":"An Intelligent Selection Model for Optimum Artificial Lift Method Using Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Approach","authors":"Abdelateef M. Adam, A. A. Mohamed Ali, Abdelaziz A. Elsadig, A. Ahmed","doi":"10.4043/31482-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The urge to design a selection model for a proper artificial lift system is noticeably escalating. It becomes prudent for the operator to consider most, if not all, of the available evaluation and selection methods. The concept behind it is to yield improved production at better conditions than could be expected.\n The artificial lift includes five methods, and it is very crucial to select the best method considering the field conditions. In this paper, the best artificial lift is selected using multiple criteria decision-making model which is composed of the combination of Technique for Order Preference by the Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).\n This new user-friendly model undertakes 15 essential technical factors sorted into three sets (well data, reservoir data, and quantitative data) each factor has its own weight in the final selection decision. Furthermore, the Results depicted in bar graph for further illustration. It is important to note that the final decision is entirely based on technical manners. Additional economic evaluation and detailed cost analysis are required when the model results in close outputs between alternatives.\n Lastly, this integrated model was tested on 12 wells from block-4 and Block-6 in Sudan, inputs were real-time data from initial and status. Successfully, in the end, it yielded its theoretical results.","PeriodicalId":11081,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, March 23, 2022","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, March 23, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/31482-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The urge to design a selection model for a proper artificial lift system is noticeably escalating. It becomes prudent for the operator to consider most, if not all, of the available evaluation and selection methods. The concept behind it is to yield improved production at better conditions than could be expected. The artificial lift includes five methods, and it is very crucial to select the best method considering the field conditions. In this paper, the best artificial lift is selected using multiple criteria decision-making model which is composed of the combination of Technique for Order Preference by the Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). This new user-friendly model undertakes 15 essential technical factors sorted into three sets (well data, reservoir data, and quantitative data) each factor has its own weight in the final selection decision. Furthermore, the Results depicted in bar graph for further illustration. It is important to note that the final decision is entirely based on technical manners. Additional economic evaluation and detailed cost analysis are required when the model results in close outputs between alternatives. Lastly, this integrated model was tested on 12 wells from block-4 and Block-6 in Sudan, inputs were real-time data from initial and status. Successfully, in the end, it yielded its theoretical results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于多准则决策方法的人工举升方法智能选择模型
为合适的人工举升系统设计选择模型的需求正在明显升级。对于操作人员来说,考虑大多数(如果不是全部的话)可用的评估和选择方法变得谨慎。其背后的概念是在比预期更好的条件下提高产量。人工举升有五种方法,结合现场条件选择最佳方法至关重要。本文采用与理想解相似度排序偏好技术(TOPSIS)和层次分析法(AHP)相结合的多准则决策模型,选择最优人工举升方案。这种新的用户友好模型将15个关键技术因素分为三组(井数据、油藏数据和定量数据),每个因素在最终选择决策中都有自己的权重。此外,为了进一步说明,结果用柱状图表示。重要的是要注意,最终的决定完全是基于技术方式。当模型在两个备选方案之间的产出接近时,需要进行额外的经济评价和详细的成本分析。最后,在苏丹区块4和区块6的12口井上对该集成模型进行了测试,输入的是初始和状态的实时数据。最后,它成功地得出了理论结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Utilisation a Hydraulic Workover Unit for Gravel Pack Job in Indonesia The Versatile and Tunable Metal-Organic Framework MOF for Condensate Decontamination Geological Field Characteristic of the Black Shales in the Belata Formation, Peninsular Malaysia An Intelligent Selection Model for Optimum Artificial Lift Method Using Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Approach Noise Logging Application for Well Integrity Evaluation: A Case Study in Peninsular Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1