Resources at risk: making the most of the ICS 232 form

H. Dubach, Steven G. Buschang
{"title":"Resources at risk: making the most of the ICS 232 form","authors":"H. Dubach, Steven G. Buschang","doi":"10.7901/2169-3358-2021.1.688739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The ICS 232 Resources at Risk summary form is a key tool for the communication of resources at risk from an oil or chemical spill. Completion of the form requires consideration of environmental, archeocultural, and socio-economic resources that may be affected by a spill. This process of research, identification, prioritization, documentation, and communication of potential resources in the pathway of a spill is typically conducted within the Environmental Unit (EU) by the Resources at Risk (RAR) Technical Specialist or Environmental Unit Leader (EUL), with input from relevant stakeholders and trustees. The purpose of the form is twofold: to provide environmental information to aid assessment and decision making, for example: identifying where to conduct wildlife reconnaissance surveys, identifying resources of concern for Spill Impact Mitigation Assessment (SIMA)/ Net Environmental Benefit Analysis (NEBA), and recommending cleanup techniques and endpoints; andTo provide direct priorities for protection for response operations, such as from pre-established Geographic Response Plans (GRPs) or Geographic Response Strategies (GRSs), and other static or Geographic Informational Systems (GIS) data sources.\n In recent years, GRP/GRSs have become more commonplace in contingency plans, and have become more practical for response operations, to a degree that some plans include executing the GRP/GRSs as ready-made ICS 204 (work order) forms to provide direct instruction to response operations on site location, access, operational strategies, and equipment required to protect specific resources. This pre-spill information can be valuable to ensure that priority resources are protected within the short window of opportunity that is typically available at the beginning of a response; and allows quick decision-making without the need for in-depth consideration of sensitivity and resource maps. A potential downside to this convenient data, which will be explored in this paper, is that we risk relying entirely on using the GRP data to provide operational protection priorities and losing the specific data on the resources we are aiming to protect. This reduces the purpose of the form to a purely operational instruction, without the documentation of environmental data that is essential for assessment and decision making within the Environmental Unit. This paper considers the use of the ICS 232 (Resources at Risk) form, how its use has developed over the years, and how the availability of GRPs has, in some areas, shifted the use of the form to a more directly operational purpose. Recommendations are provided for ensuring that the environmental information component is not forgotten.","PeriodicalId":14447,"journal":{"name":"International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7901/2169-3358-2021.1.688739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ICS 232 Resources at Risk summary form is a key tool for the communication of resources at risk from an oil or chemical spill. Completion of the form requires consideration of environmental, archeocultural, and socio-economic resources that may be affected by a spill. This process of research, identification, prioritization, documentation, and communication of potential resources in the pathway of a spill is typically conducted within the Environmental Unit (EU) by the Resources at Risk (RAR) Technical Specialist or Environmental Unit Leader (EUL), with input from relevant stakeholders and trustees. The purpose of the form is twofold: to provide environmental information to aid assessment and decision making, for example: identifying where to conduct wildlife reconnaissance surveys, identifying resources of concern for Spill Impact Mitigation Assessment (SIMA)/ Net Environmental Benefit Analysis (NEBA), and recommending cleanup techniques and endpoints; andTo provide direct priorities for protection for response operations, such as from pre-established Geographic Response Plans (GRPs) or Geographic Response Strategies (GRSs), and other static or Geographic Informational Systems (GIS) data sources. In recent years, GRP/GRSs have become more commonplace in contingency plans, and have become more practical for response operations, to a degree that some plans include executing the GRP/GRSs as ready-made ICS 204 (work order) forms to provide direct instruction to response operations on site location, access, operational strategies, and equipment required to protect specific resources. This pre-spill information can be valuable to ensure that priority resources are protected within the short window of opportunity that is typically available at the beginning of a response; and allows quick decision-making without the need for in-depth consideration of sensitivity and resource maps. A potential downside to this convenient data, which will be explored in this paper, is that we risk relying entirely on using the GRP data to provide operational protection priorities and losing the specific data on the resources we are aiming to protect. This reduces the purpose of the form to a purely operational instruction, without the documentation of environmental data that is essential for assessment and decision making within the Environmental Unit. This paper considers the use of the ICS 232 (Resources at Risk) form, how its use has developed over the years, and how the availability of GRPs has, in some areas, shifted the use of the form to a more directly operational purpose. Recommendations are provided for ensuring that the environmental information component is not forgotten.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面临风险的资源:充分利用ICS 232表格
ICS 232风险资源汇总表是沟通石油或化学品泄漏风险资源的关键工具。填写表格需要考虑可能受泄漏影响的环境、文化和社会经济资源。这一研究、识别、优先排序、记录和沟通泄漏路径中潜在资源的过程通常由环境部门(EU)内的风险资源(RAR)技术专家或环境部门负责人(EUL)进行,并听取相关利益相关者和受托人的意见。该表格的目的有两个:提供环境信息,以协助评估和决策,例如:确定在何处进行野生动物侦察调查,确定对减轻泄漏影响评估(SIMA)/净环境效益分析(NEBA)关注的资源,并建议清理技术和终点;为响应行动提供直接的优先保护,例如预先建立的地理响应计划(grp)或地理响应策略(grs),以及其他静态或地理信息系统(GIS)数据源。近年来,GRP/GRSs在应急计划中变得越来越普遍,并且在响应操作中变得更加实用,在某种程度上,一些计划包括将GRP/GRSs作为现成的ICS 204(工作命令)表格执行,以直接指导响应操作,包括现场位置、访问、操作策略和保护特定资源所需的设备。这种泄漏前的信息对于确保优先资源在响应开始时通常可用的短暂机会窗口内得到保护是有价值的;并允许快速决策,而无需深入考虑敏感性和资源地图。本文将探讨这种便利数据的潜在缺点,即我们可能完全依赖于使用GRP数据来提供操作保护优先级,从而丢失有关我们旨在保护的资源的特定数据。这将表格的目的减少为纯粹的操作指示,没有环境数据的文件,而环境数据是环境股内部评估和决策所必需的。本文考虑了ICS 232(风险资源)表格的使用,多年来它的使用是如何发展的,以及grp的可用性如何在某些领域将表格的使用转移到更直接的操作目的。提供了一些建议,以确保环境信息组件不会被遗忘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From the deep ocean to the coasts and estuaries through the shelf: linking coastal response to a deep blow-out Case Study of a SCAT Survey and Successful Remediation Strategy by Mechanical Mixing of a Fuel Oil Spill into a Mountain Stream Using Oil Spill Modeling in Oil Spill Exercises and Drills In Situ Burn Testing of Weathered and Emulsified Crude Oils Historical Dispersant Use in U.S. Waters 1968–2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1