{"title":"Dietitian-led clinics in primary care: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"M. Hickson, A. Wanner, A. Collinson","doi":"10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nThis scoping review aims to examine and map the existing evidence exploring and/or evaluating the implementation, cost and/or effectiveness of dietitian-led clinics in primary care.\n\n\nINTRODUCTION\nDietitians may be able to offer new models of care within the primary care setting for relevant diagnosed patients, providing cheaper, more efficient and effective service in comparison to the traditional approach of general practitioner support and referral for specialist treatment. There is some evidence for the efficacy of dietetic care in primary care, but there is a lack of information concerning the broader contribution dietitians may make, including cost effectiveness and the range of conditions that dietitians may successfully manage.\n\n\nINCLUSION CRITERIA\nEligible studies will explore dietitian or nutritionist-led clinics treating patients with any condition, and will be based in primary care or general practice settings in developed countries. Studies may include experimental, quasi-experimental, observational and qualitative studies.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe searches will be limited to the past 10 years to ensure retrieved information will be relevant to today's healthcare setting. There will be no limit for language. The following databases will be searched: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), AMED (EBSCO), British Nursing Index (ProQuest), and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Wiley). Retrieved papers will be screened for inclusion by at least two reviewers. Where a decision is not possible, full text will be retrieved and reviewed. Data will be extracted from the included papers and a narrative summary will accompany the charted results and will describe how the results relate to the review's objective.","PeriodicalId":73539,"journal":{"name":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
This scoping review aims to examine and map the existing evidence exploring and/or evaluating the implementation, cost and/or effectiveness of dietitian-led clinics in primary care.
INTRODUCTION
Dietitians may be able to offer new models of care within the primary care setting for relevant diagnosed patients, providing cheaper, more efficient and effective service in comparison to the traditional approach of general practitioner support and referral for specialist treatment. There is some evidence for the efficacy of dietetic care in primary care, but there is a lack of information concerning the broader contribution dietitians may make, including cost effectiveness and the range of conditions that dietitians may successfully manage.
INCLUSION CRITERIA
Eligible studies will explore dietitian or nutritionist-led clinics treating patients with any condition, and will be based in primary care or general practice settings in developed countries. Studies may include experimental, quasi-experimental, observational and qualitative studies.
METHODS
The searches will be limited to the past 10 years to ensure retrieved information will be relevant to today's healthcare setting. There will be no limit for language. The following databases will be searched: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), AMED (EBSCO), British Nursing Index (ProQuest), and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Wiley). Retrieved papers will be screened for inclusion by at least two reviewers. Where a decision is not possible, full text will be retrieved and reviewed. Data will be extracted from the included papers and a narrative summary will accompany the charted results and will describe how the results relate to the review's objective.