Dietitian-led clinics in primary care: a scoping review protocol.

M. Hickson, A. Wanner, A. Collinson
{"title":"Dietitian-led clinics in primary care: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"M. Hickson, A. Wanner, A. Collinson","doi":"10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nThis scoping review aims to examine and map the existing evidence exploring and/or evaluating the implementation, cost and/or effectiveness of dietitian-led clinics in primary care.\n\n\nINTRODUCTION\nDietitians may be able to offer new models of care within the primary care setting for relevant diagnosed patients, providing cheaper, more efficient and effective service in comparison to the traditional approach of general practitioner support and referral for specialist treatment. There is some evidence for the efficacy of dietetic care in primary care, but there is a lack of information concerning the broader contribution dietitians may make, including cost effectiveness and the range of conditions that dietitians may successfully manage.\n\n\nINCLUSION CRITERIA\nEligible studies will explore dietitian or nutritionist-led clinics treating patients with any condition, and will be based in primary care or general practice settings in developed countries. Studies may include experimental, quasi-experimental, observational and qualitative studies.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe searches will be limited to the past 10 years to ensure retrieved information will be relevant to today's healthcare setting. There will be no limit for language. The following databases will be searched: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), AMED (EBSCO), British Nursing Index (ProQuest), and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Wiley). Retrieved papers will be screened for inclusion by at least two reviewers. Where a decision is not possible, full text will be retrieved and reviewed. Data will be extracted from the included papers and a narrative summary will accompany the charted results and will describe how the results relate to the review's objective.","PeriodicalId":73539,"journal":{"name":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

OBJECTIVE This scoping review aims to examine and map the existing evidence exploring and/or evaluating the implementation, cost and/or effectiveness of dietitian-led clinics in primary care. INTRODUCTION Dietitians may be able to offer new models of care within the primary care setting for relevant diagnosed patients, providing cheaper, more efficient and effective service in comparison to the traditional approach of general practitioner support and referral for specialist treatment. There is some evidence for the efficacy of dietetic care in primary care, but there is a lack of information concerning the broader contribution dietitians may make, including cost effectiveness and the range of conditions that dietitians may successfully manage. INCLUSION CRITERIA Eligible studies will explore dietitian or nutritionist-led clinics treating patients with any condition, and will be based in primary care or general practice settings in developed countries. Studies may include experimental, quasi-experimental, observational and qualitative studies. METHODS The searches will be limited to the past 10 years to ensure retrieved information will be relevant to today's healthcare setting. There will be no limit for language. The following databases will be searched: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), AMED (EBSCO), British Nursing Index (ProQuest), and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Wiley). Retrieved papers will be screened for inclusion by at least two reviewers. Where a decision is not possible, full text will be retrieved and reviewed. Data will be extracted from the included papers and a narrative summary will accompany the charted results and will describe how the results relate to the review's objective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级保健中营养师主导的诊所:范围审查方案。
目的:本综述旨在检查和绘制现有的证据,探索和/或评估营养师主导的初级保健诊所的实施、成本和/或有效性。与传统的全科医生支持和专科治疗转诊相比,营养师可能能够在初级保健环境中为相关确诊患者提供新的护理模式,提供更便宜、更高效和更有效的服务。有一些证据表明饮食保健在初级保健中的有效性,但缺乏关于营养师可能做出的更广泛贡献的信息,包括成本效益和营养师可能成功管理的条件范围。纳入标准:符合条件的研究将探索营养学家或营养学家领导的治疗任何疾病患者的诊所,并将以发达国家的初级保健或全科医疗机构为基础。研究可能包括实验、准实验、观察和定性研究。方法搜索将限于过去10年,以确保检索到的信息与当今的医疗保健环境相关。语言将没有限制。将检索以下数据库:MEDLINE (Ovid)、Embase (Ovid)、PsycINFO (Ovid)、CINAHL (EBSCO)、AMED (EBSCO)、British Nursing Index (ProQuest)和Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Wiley)。检索到的论文将由至少两名审稿人筛选纳入。如果无法作出决定,将检索全文并进行审查。数据将从纳入的论文中提取,图表结果将附有叙述性摘要,并将描述结果与综述目标的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Post-discharge interventions to enhance coping skills for survivors of stroke and their caregivers: a scoping review protocol. Approaches to implementing individual placement and support in the health and welfare sectors: a scoping review protocol. Obesity and dental caries in early childhood: a systematic review protocol. Experiences of family caregivers caring for critically ill children hospitalized in a pediatric intensive care unit: a qualitative systematic review protocol. Hernioplasty using low-cost mesh compared to surgical mesh in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1