A Systematic Review on Modulation of Oral Biofilm and Immune Response Associated to Mucosa with Probiotic Bacteria as a Potential Approach in the Prevention of Dental Caries

María de Lourdes Rodríguez Coyago, Juan Fernando Buestán Zambrano, J. Vire, María Paz Pinos Gavilanes, L. Ayala
{"title":"A Systematic Review on Modulation of Oral Biofilm and Immune Response Associated to Mucosa with Probiotic Bacteria as a Potential Approach in the Prevention of Dental Caries","authors":"María de Lourdes Rodríguez Coyago, Juan Fernando Buestán Zambrano, J. Vire, María Paz Pinos Gavilanes, L. Ayala","doi":"10.9734/bpi/idhr/v4/3161f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A variety of approaches have been developed for the control of dental caries, a pathology with high incidence and prevalence worldwide. The use of probiotic strains for the modulation of dental biofilm in the prevention of caries has been studied, but the available evidence shows varied methodologies; and the strains tested differ from one study to another. \nObjective: To analyze the efficacy of using probiotic strains to prevent caries through the modulation of biofilm and immune response associated to oral mucosa. \nMethods: A search was made in the scientific bases PubMed, Cochrane and Science Direct, prioritizing randomized double and triple-blind clinical trials from 2010 to 2020, including a total of 20 studies to be analyzed. The selection criteria were consistent with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews protocol. \nResults: Within the studies, different types of probiotic bacteria were analyzed, dominating Lactobacillus paracasei. While most clinical trials show a favorable response in terms of a significant reduction of Streptococcus mutans in the oral microbiota, very few studies evaluated salivary pH and sIgA levels. \nConclusions: The heterogeneity of the studies analyzed and the multifactorial nature of dental caries do not allow us to ensure that probiotic therapy is completely effective in preventing this pathology. Although probiotic therapy can help by regulating the microbiological factor, there are other determinants that can favor the development of caries and that are barely approached in their relationship with bacteriotherapy. Future studies that homogeneously evaluate the use of probiotics could give us a clearer idea of their effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":14517,"journal":{"name":"Issues and Development in Health Research Vol. 4","volume":"262 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues and Development in Health Research Vol. 4","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/idhr/v4/3161f","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A variety of approaches have been developed for the control of dental caries, a pathology with high incidence and prevalence worldwide. The use of probiotic strains for the modulation of dental biofilm in the prevention of caries has been studied, but the available evidence shows varied methodologies; and the strains tested differ from one study to another. Objective: To analyze the efficacy of using probiotic strains to prevent caries through the modulation of biofilm and immune response associated to oral mucosa. Methods: A search was made in the scientific bases PubMed, Cochrane and Science Direct, prioritizing randomized double and triple-blind clinical trials from 2010 to 2020, including a total of 20 studies to be analyzed. The selection criteria were consistent with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews protocol. Results: Within the studies, different types of probiotic bacteria were analyzed, dominating Lactobacillus paracasei. While most clinical trials show a favorable response in terms of a significant reduction of Streptococcus mutans in the oral microbiota, very few studies evaluated salivary pH and sIgA levels. Conclusions: The heterogeneity of the studies analyzed and the multifactorial nature of dental caries do not allow us to ensure that probiotic therapy is completely effective in preventing this pathology. Although probiotic therapy can help by regulating the microbiological factor, there are other determinants that can favor the development of caries and that are barely approached in their relationship with bacteriotherapy. Future studies that homogeneously evaluate the use of probiotics could give us a clearer idea of their effectiveness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
益生菌调节口腔生物膜和黏膜免疫反应作为预防龋齿的潜在途径的系统综述
背景:龋齿是一种在世界范围内具有高发病率和流行率的疾病,目前已有多种方法用于控制龋齿。益生菌菌株在预防龋齿中调节牙生物膜的使用已被研究,但现有证据显示不同的方法;不同的研究测试的菌株也不同。目的:分析益生菌菌株通过调节口腔黏膜生物膜和免疫反应预防龋病的效果。方法:检索PubMed、Cochrane和Science Direct等科学数据库,选取2010年至2020年的随机双盲和三盲临床试验,共20项研究进行分析。选择标准与系统评价方案的首选报告项目一致。结果:在研究中,分析了不同类型的益生菌,以副干酪乳杆菌为主。虽然大多数临床试验显示口腔微生物群中变形链球菌的显著减少有良好的反应,但很少有研究评估唾液pH值和sIgA水平。结论:所分析研究的异质性和龋齿的多因素性质使我们无法确保益生菌治疗在预防龋齿病理方面完全有效。虽然益生菌治疗可以通过调节微生物因素来帮助,但还有其他决定因素可以促进龋齿的发展,并且几乎没有接触到它们与细菌治疗的关系。未来对益生菌使用进行均匀评估的研究可以让我们更清楚地了解它们的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigating the Role of Health Promotion Strategies on Lifestyle and Behavioral Changes to Reduce the Number of Non-communicable Disease Patient A Systematic Review on Modulation of Oral Biofilm and Immune Response Associated to Mucosa with Probiotic Bacteria as a Potential Approach in the Prevention of Dental Caries Oral Epithelial Cytokines: A Review Determining the Impact of Diet and Nutrition on Periodontal Health and Disease Recent study on Laboratory Development Cellular Immune Features and Immune Interference of Prototype Eschericia Coli and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Combined Bacterins in a Lapin Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1