Effectiveness of Communication Board on Level of Satisfaction Over Communication among Mechanically Venitlated Patients

D. Metilda, Dr. A. Jaganath
{"title":"Effectiveness of Communication Board on Level of Satisfaction Over Communication among Mechanically Venitlated Patients","authors":"D. Metilda, Dr. A. Jaganath","doi":"10.38124/ijisrt20sep055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mechanical ventilation is widely used to treat patients with critical conditions. This treatment is usually applied for difficulty in breathing. The use of mechanical ventilation devices has unique benefits to the patient. However, it can also cause various problems. Reduction in communication rank as one of the most negative experiences in mechanically ventilated patients. Effective communication with ventilator-based patients is essential. Nursing management of a mechanically ventilated patient is challenging on many levels, requiring a wealth of high technical skills. The Patient Communications Board improves communication, maintains information and creates a comfortable, attractive setting for patient, family and health care workers. The research methodology used for the study is a Quasi experimental approach, post-test only design with a comparison group to assess the effect of the communication board on the level of satisfaction over communication among clients on mechanical ventilator. The sample was selected by purposive sampling technique and included 30 (experimental group-15, control group-15), mechanically ventilated patients in PESIMR hospital, Kuppam. The control group patients were provided with routine communication methods, while the experimental group were communicated with communication board. The level of satisfaction on communication was assessed by a 15items rating scale. Data was analysed using both the descriptive and inferential statistics. There was a significant difference in the level of satisfaction on communication among the patients who were communicated using communication board compared to the routine method of communication. The communication board had significantly improved the communication pattern and increased the satisfaction among the patients who are mechanically ventilated.","PeriodicalId":23709,"journal":{"name":"Volume 5 - 2020, Issue 9 - September","volume":"351 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 5 - 2020, Issue 9 - September","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt20sep055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Mechanical ventilation is widely used to treat patients with critical conditions. This treatment is usually applied for difficulty in breathing. The use of mechanical ventilation devices has unique benefits to the patient. However, it can also cause various problems. Reduction in communication rank as one of the most negative experiences in mechanically ventilated patients. Effective communication with ventilator-based patients is essential. Nursing management of a mechanically ventilated patient is challenging on many levels, requiring a wealth of high technical skills. The Patient Communications Board improves communication, maintains information and creates a comfortable, attractive setting for patient, family and health care workers. The research methodology used for the study is a Quasi experimental approach, post-test only design with a comparison group to assess the effect of the communication board on the level of satisfaction over communication among clients on mechanical ventilator. The sample was selected by purposive sampling technique and included 30 (experimental group-15, control group-15), mechanically ventilated patients in PESIMR hospital, Kuppam. The control group patients were provided with routine communication methods, while the experimental group were communicated with communication board. The level of satisfaction on communication was assessed by a 15items rating scale. Data was analysed using both the descriptive and inferential statistics. There was a significant difference in the level of satisfaction on communication among the patients who were communicated using communication board compared to the routine method of communication. The communication board had significantly improved the communication pattern and increased the satisfaction among the patients who are mechanically ventilated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沟通板对机械通气患者沟通满意度的影响
机械通气被广泛用于治疗危重病人。这种疗法通常用于治疗呼吸困难。使用机械通气装置对患者有独特的好处。然而,它也会引起各种问题。沟通等级降低是机械通气患者最负面的经历之一。与使用呼吸机的患者进行有效沟通至关重要。机械通气患者的护理管理在许多层面上都具有挑战性,需要丰富的高技术技能。患者沟通委员会改善沟通,维护信息,并为患者、家属和卫生保健工作者创造一个舒适、有吸引力的环境。本研究使用的研究方法为准实验方法,仅采用测试后设计与对照组,以评估沟通板对机械呼吸机客户沟通满意度的影响。采用目的抽样方法选取库巴姆市PESIMR医院机械通气患者30例(实验组15例,对照组15例)。对照组患者采用常规交流方式,实验组患者采用交流板进行交流。沟通满意度通过15个项目的评定量表进行评估。数据分析使用描述性和推理统计。与常规沟通方式相比,使用沟通板沟通的患者对沟通的满意度有显著差异。沟通板明显改善了沟通方式,提高了机械通气患者的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Le biodéchet, une notion à stabiliser pour une meilleure valorisation Recyclabilité d’un emballage : Évaluation de la triabilité avec la technologie RFID Évaluation de la circularité des déblais comme critère d’achat éco-responsable dans les marchés de travaux Some features of short-term blood pressure variability in patients with arterial hypertension in comparison with healthy volunteers Translational medicine: ways of development in modern conditions, problems and prospects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1