OP16.13: Clinical combining‐application of ultrasound and MRI on multiplets malformations

A. Xin Lin Chen, B. Yang Xiao Hong, C. Zhu Xia, D. Lu Dan, E. Sun Zi Yan
{"title":"OP16.13: Clinical combining‐application of ultrasound and MRI on multiplets malformations","authors":"A. Xin Lin Chen, B. Yang Xiao Hong, C. Zhu Xia, D. Lu Dan, E. Sun Zi Yan","doi":"10.1002/uog.5798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To explore the diagnostic value of antenatal ultrasound combining with in utero magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in multiplets malformations, and analyze their advantages and limitations. Methods: In the period between 2004 and 2007, 105105 fetuses received ultrasound examination in our hospital. 268 cases were multifetation, including 64 multiplets malformations. And of them 11 multiplets malformations (gestational age ranged from 14–31 weeks), including 8 cases of twin pregnancy and 3 of triplet pregnancy, received MRI examination within 48 hours after ultrasound, all confirmed by autopsy. Retrospectively analyzed, the results of antenatal ultrasound and in utero MRI were compared. Results: In 11 multiplets malformations, there were 6 conjoined twins and 5 acardiac twins with twin-reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP). MRI gave identical diagnostic results with ultrasound, but each had different advantages. (1) MRI was superior to ultrasound in the following aspects: 1. the large view with visualization 2 or 3 fetal organs, even the whole fetus, placenta and amniotic sac simultaneously; 2. visualizing diprosopy of cephalopagus and identifying complex intracranial structures clearly; 3. identifying internal organs of conjoined twins; 4. demonstrating the insertion of umbilical core and the connection with fetus and placenta in acardiac twin.; 5. It showed ‘‘leopard stripe sign’’ in placenta of acardiac twin. (2) Ultrasound was superior to MRI in two aspects: 1. detecting hemodynamic change in TRAP; 2. evaluating cardiac function and finding cardiac anomalies, such as hemicardia of acardiac twin. Conclusions: Ultrasound and MRI are complement with each other in diagnosing multiplets malformations, The combining application of ultrasound and MRI could improve the diagnostic accuracy on multiplets malformations","PeriodicalId":23453,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"106 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.5798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the diagnostic value of antenatal ultrasound combining with in utero magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in multiplets malformations, and analyze their advantages and limitations. Methods: In the period between 2004 and 2007, 105105 fetuses received ultrasound examination in our hospital. 268 cases were multifetation, including 64 multiplets malformations. And of them 11 multiplets malformations (gestational age ranged from 14–31 weeks), including 8 cases of twin pregnancy and 3 of triplet pregnancy, received MRI examination within 48 hours after ultrasound, all confirmed by autopsy. Retrospectively analyzed, the results of antenatal ultrasound and in utero MRI were compared. Results: In 11 multiplets malformations, there were 6 conjoined twins and 5 acardiac twins with twin-reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP). MRI gave identical diagnostic results with ultrasound, but each had different advantages. (1) MRI was superior to ultrasound in the following aspects: 1. the large view with visualization 2 or 3 fetal organs, even the whole fetus, placenta and amniotic sac simultaneously; 2. visualizing diprosopy of cephalopagus and identifying complex intracranial structures clearly; 3. identifying internal organs of conjoined twins; 4. demonstrating the insertion of umbilical core and the connection with fetus and placenta in acardiac twin.; 5. It showed ‘‘leopard stripe sign’’ in placenta of acardiac twin. (2) Ultrasound was superior to MRI in two aspects: 1. detecting hemodynamic change in TRAP; 2. evaluating cardiac function and finding cardiac anomalies, such as hemicardia of acardiac twin. Conclusions: Ultrasound and MRI are complement with each other in diagnosing multiplets malformations, The combining application of ultrasound and MRI could improve the diagnostic accuracy on multiplets malformations
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
OP16.13:超声与MRI在多胞胎畸形中的临床联合应用
目的:探讨产前超声联合子宫内磁共振成像(MRI)对多胞胎畸形的诊断价值,并分析其优缺点。方法:2004 ~ 2007年在我院超声检查胎儿105105例。多胎268例,其中畸形多胞胎64例。其中11例多胞胎畸形(胎龄14-31周),其中8例双胎妊娠,3例三胞胎妊娠,均在超声后48小时内行MRI检查,均经尸检证实。回顾性分析,比较产前超声和宫内MRI检查结果。结果:11例畸形多胞胎中,6例为连体双胞胎,5例为双动脉灌注逆转双胞胎。核磁共振成像的诊断结果与超声波相同,但两者都有不同的优势。(1) MRI在以下方面优于超声:大视野,可同时显示2、3个胎儿器官,甚至整个胎儿、胎盘和羊膜囊;2. 头颅畸形的可视化及颅内复杂结构的清晰识别3.鉴定连体双胞胎的内脏器官;4. 心双生子脐心的植入及与胎儿、胎盘的连接5. 双心胎胎盘呈“豹纹征”。(2)超声在两个方面优于MRI:检测TRAP血流动力学变化;2. 评估心脏功能和发现心脏异常,如双心双胞胎的半心绞痛。结论:超声与MRI在诊断多胞胎畸形中是相辅相成的,超声与MRI联合应用可提高多胞胎畸形的诊断准确率
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
OP16.13: Clinical combining‐application of ultrasound and MRI on multiplets malformations P37.08: Twin reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP) sequence: Case report of conservative management and good pregnancy outcome OC072: Assessment of endometrial and ovarian characteristics using 3‐D power Doppler ultrasound to predict response in frozen embryo transfer cycles OP03.18: Brain echogenicities in fetuses at risk for preterm birth P20.09: Three‐dimensional sonographic assessment of septate uterus before and after hysteroscopic metroplasty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1