Quality of life and coping strategies in the Covid-19 pandemic: Comparison analysis between middle-aged and eldery people

{"title":"Quality of life and coping strategies in the Covid-19 pandemic: Comparison analysis between middle-aged and eldery people","authors":"","doi":"10.37118/ijdr.26908.07.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The emergence of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has triggered a global public health crisis and posed an unprecedented threat to mental health worldwide. The aim of this study was to compare quality of life variables and coping strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic between two different age groups: middle-aged people and elderly people. Descriptive and comparative studies were carried out. The study has a quantitative, correlational and cross-sectional design. The sample was for convenience and not probabilistic. 311 people aged over 40 years were interviewed. The following evaluation instruments were used: socio-demographic data, EUROHIS- QOL and the Coping Strategies Inventory. For the comparative study of means, the Mann-Whitney U test was used, with a significance level ≤. 0.05. For the statistical study, IBM-SPSS, v. 28.0. A statistically significant relationship (p<0.001) was identified with respect to the variable satisfaction with personal relationships during the pandemic, being higher among the group of elderly people. Coping strategies were more used by the middle-aged group (p=0.050). Coping strategies: thought that the situation happened because of others (p=0.031), complained or vented to someone (p<0.001), showed hostility (p=0.018), drank and ate excessively to compensate or to forget what was happening (p<0.001), shouting and swearing (p<0.001) were more used by middle-aged people. The strategy trusted in God or in some higher being or force was more used by elderly participants (p=0.012). The expression of negative emotions was more used by the middle-aged group (p<0.001) and the inhibition of emotions as well (p=0.002). The results highlight the resilience of older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic and provide additional insight into the influence of pandemic-related stressors on age-related psychosocial functioning.","PeriodicalId":13916,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Development and Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Development and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37118/ijdr.26908.07.2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The emergence of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has triggered a global public health crisis and posed an unprecedented threat to mental health worldwide. The aim of this study was to compare quality of life variables and coping strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic between two different age groups: middle-aged people and elderly people. Descriptive and comparative studies were carried out. The study has a quantitative, correlational and cross-sectional design. The sample was for convenience and not probabilistic. 311 people aged over 40 years were interviewed. The following evaluation instruments were used: socio-demographic data, EUROHIS- QOL and the Coping Strategies Inventory. For the comparative study of means, the Mann-Whitney U test was used, with a significance level ≤. 0.05. For the statistical study, IBM-SPSS, v. 28.0. A statistically significant relationship (p<0.001) was identified with respect to the variable satisfaction with personal relationships during the pandemic, being higher among the group of elderly people. Coping strategies were more used by the middle-aged group (p=0.050). Coping strategies: thought that the situation happened because of others (p=0.031), complained or vented to someone (p<0.001), showed hostility (p=0.018), drank and ate excessively to compensate or to forget what was happening (p<0.001), shouting and swearing (p<0.001) were more used by middle-aged people. The strategy trusted in God or in some higher being or force was more used by elderly participants (p=0.012). The expression of negative emotions was more used by the middle-aged group (p<0.001) and the inhibition of emotions as well (p=0.002). The results highlight the resilience of older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic and provide additional insight into the influence of pandemic-related stressors on age-related psychosocial functioning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎大流行中老年人的生活质量与应对策略比较分析
新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的出现引发了全球公共卫生危机,对全球精神卫生构成了前所未有的威胁。本研究的目的是比较两个不同年龄组:中年人和老年人在COVID-19大流行期间的生活质量变量和应对策略。进行了描述性和比较性研究。本研究采用定量、相关和横断面设计。这个样本是为了方便而不是概率。调查对象为311名40岁以上的老年人。使用了以下评估工具:社会人口统计数据、EUROHIS- QOL和应对策略量表。均值比较研究采用Mann-Whitney U检验,显著性水平≤。0.05. 统计研究采用IBM-SPSS, v. 28.0。在大流行期间,对个人关系的变量满意度存在统计学显著关系(p<0.001),在老年人群体中更高。中年组使用应对策略较多(p=0.050)。应对策略:认为情况的发生是因为别人(p=0.031),向某人抱怨或发泄(p<0.001),表现出敌意(p=0.018),过度饮酒和饮食以补偿或忘记发生的事情(p<0.001),大喊大叫和咒骂(p<0.001)多用于中年人。老年人更倾向于相信上帝或更高的存在或力量(p=0.012)。中年组负性情绪表达多(p<0.001),情绪抑制多(p=0.002)。研究结果突出了老年人在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的复原力,并进一步了解了与大流行相关的压力源对年龄相关的心理社会功能的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rethinking of masculinities: an evolving perspective Desafios no atendimento de urgência: a tecnologia a serviço da humanização e acolhimento A case study on the impact of technology integration on student learning outcomes at indus international school, bangalore Ease of life and sustainability (current events for the future life) Neurodidáctica: el puente hacia un aprendizaje efectivo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1