Virtual Team Member Perspectives on Personal Development: A Sequential Explanatory Study

IF 0.8 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1002/nha3.20340
Donna L. Edsall, K. A. Conrad
{"title":"Virtual Team Member Perspectives on Personal Development: A Sequential Explanatory Study","authors":"Donna L. Edsall, K. A. Conrad","doi":"10.1002/nha3.20340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of virtual teams in organizations has shifted upward exponentially since the onset of COVID–19, yet available research does not include findings based on workplace virtual team members, as opposed to student populations. Research is limited on what virtual workplace team members consider important in the performance coaching and personal development processes. Research on virtual team member perspectives is valuable for human resource professionals and organizational leaders and particularly helpful to organizations struggling to respond to the new work–at–home environment. The purpose of the mixed–methods study was to explore the perspectives of virtual team members about how performance coaching, mentoring, and training contribute to their personal development. Participants for the study were members of social network virtual team groups who have been members of virtual work teams. The sequential explanatory study data was from a sample of 149 virtual team members (12 for the pilot survey and 137 for the full study). The Kruskal–Wallis results led to the rejection of the null hypothesis at an overall significance level of 0.05, with significance levels of 0.014 for coaching and 0.008 for mentoring, indicating a perceived positive contribution from performance development efforts (coaching and mentoring) on the personal development of individual virtual team members. These results on the interpersonal aspects of virtual teams from team members and consideration of perspectives on their personal development provide organizations, leadership, and human resources professionals, valuable information to improve virtual teams and the team member experience in normal and unusual work situations.","PeriodicalId":43405,"journal":{"name":"New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development","volume":"38 1","pages":"3 - 27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.20340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The use of virtual teams in organizations has shifted upward exponentially since the onset of COVID–19, yet available research does not include findings based on workplace virtual team members, as opposed to student populations. Research is limited on what virtual workplace team members consider important in the performance coaching and personal development processes. Research on virtual team member perspectives is valuable for human resource professionals and organizational leaders and particularly helpful to organizations struggling to respond to the new work–at–home environment. The purpose of the mixed–methods study was to explore the perspectives of virtual team members about how performance coaching, mentoring, and training contribute to their personal development. Participants for the study were members of social network virtual team groups who have been members of virtual work teams. The sequential explanatory study data was from a sample of 149 virtual team members (12 for the pilot survey and 137 for the full study). The Kruskal–Wallis results led to the rejection of the null hypothesis at an overall significance level of 0.05, with significance levels of 0.014 for coaching and 0.008 for mentoring, indicating a perceived positive contribution from performance development efforts (coaching and mentoring) on the personal development of individual virtual team members. These results on the interpersonal aspects of virtual teams from team members and consideration of perspectives on their personal development provide organizations, leadership, and human resources professionals, valuable information to improve virtual teams and the team member experience in normal and unusual work situations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚拟团队成员对个人发展的看法:一项序贯解释研究
自2019冠状病毒病爆发以来,组织中虚拟团队的使用呈指数级上升,但现有研究并未包括基于工作场所虚拟团队成员的调查结果,而不是基于学生群体的调查结果。关于虚拟工作场所团队成员在绩效指导和个人发展过程中认为重要的是什么,研究是有限的。对虚拟团队成员观点的研究对于人力资源专家和组织领导者来说是很有价值的,对那些努力应对新的在家工作环境的组织来说尤其有帮助。混合方法研究的目的是探索虚拟团队成员关于绩效指导、指导和培训如何促进其个人发展的观点。该研究的参与者是社交网络虚拟团队的成员,他们曾经是虚拟工作团队的成员。顺序解释性研究数据来自149个虚拟团队成员的样本(12个用于试点调查,137个用于完整研究)。Kruskal-Wallis的结果导致零假设在0.05的总体显著性水平上被拒绝,指导的显著性水平为0.014,指导的显著性水平为0.008,表明绩效发展努力(指导和指导)对虚拟团队个体成员个人发展的积极贡献。这些从团队成员和个人发展角度考虑的关于虚拟团队人际关系方面的结果为组织、领导和人力资源专业人员提供了宝贵的信息,以改善虚拟团队和团队成员在正常和不寻常的工作环境中的体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
27.30%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Equity, Empowerment, and Social Justice: Social Entrepreneurship for Formerly Incarcerated Individuals From Tradition to Transformation: The Social Entrepreneurial Journey of Japanese Women A Literature Review of Mad Studies as Critical Pedagogy: What is Mad Studies, and How Does it Implicate the Education of Adults? The Presentation to Publication Pipeline The Death of the Girlboss: Critical Feminist Epistemology and Implications for Human Resource Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1