DIAGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF CLINICAL AND LABORATORY INDICES IN VERIFICATION OF ACUTE NON-STREPTOCOCCAL TONSYLOPHARYNGITIS IN CHILDREN

L. A. Ivanova, I. Horbatiuk, I. Horbatiuk, I. Balaniuk, A. O. Shkilnyuk
{"title":"DIAGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF CLINICAL AND LABORATORY INDICES IN VERIFICATION OF ACUTE NON-STREPTOCOCCAL TONSYLOPHARYNGITIS IN CHILDREN","authors":"L. A. Ivanova, I. Horbatiuk, I. Horbatiuk, I. Balaniuk, A. O. Shkilnyuk","doi":"10.24061/1727-4338.XX.1.75.2021.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study - to study the diagnostic significance of clinical and laboratoryparameters in the verification of acute non-streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis in childrenin order to determine rational treatment tactics.Material and methods. To achieve this aim, two clinical groups were formed. The first (I,main) group consisted of 66 patients with acute tonsillopharyngitis of non-streptococcaletiology, as evidenced by the negative result of bacterial examination of the lavage ofthe pharynx and posterior pharyngeal wall. The second (II) clinical group included 32children diagnosed with \"streptococcal acute tonsillopharyngitis\".Results. The total score on the McIsaac scale, which did not exceed 2 points, wasregistered in 15.2 ± 4.4% of group I patients and 6.2 ± 4.2% of patients in the comparisongroup. The sensitivity of the method was 15.2%, specificity – 93.7%, positive and negativepredicted value – 83.3% and 34.8%, respectively, with odds ratio – 2.6 [95% CI: 0.5-13,0]. The average content of leukocytes in the blood less than 8.9 × 109/l was registeredin 57.6% of patients of group I and 48.8% of representatives of the second (P˃0.05). Thesensitivity of this laboratory test in the detection of non-streptococcal tonsillopharyngitiswas 57.6%, specificity – 55.6%, predicted value of a positive result – 54.1%, predictedvalue of a negative result – 59.1%. The relative risk of non-streptococcal etiology of ATPwhen registering a patient with less than 8.9 × 109/l of peripheral blood leukocytes was1.7 (95% CI 0.9-2.9), the absolute risk – 0.1 with odds ratio of 1.7 (95% CI 0.9-2.9).Conclusions. The proposed clinical scales and some paraclinical parameters haveinsufficient diagnostic value, so they cannot be used independently for early verificationof non-streptococcal etiology of tonsillopharyngitis in children.","PeriodicalId":12291,"journal":{"name":"Experimental pathology","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24061/1727-4338.XX.1.75.2021.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study - to study the diagnostic significance of clinical and laboratoryparameters in the verification of acute non-streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis in childrenin order to determine rational treatment tactics.Material and methods. To achieve this aim, two clinical groups were formed. The first (I,main) group consisted of 66 patients with acute tonsillopharyngitis of non-streptococcaletiology, as evidenced by the negative result of bacterial examination of the lavage ofthe pharynx and posterior pharyngeal wall. The second (II) clinical group included 32children diagnosed with "streptococcal acute tonsillopharyngitis".Results. The total score on the McIsaac scale, which did not exceed 2 points, wasregistered in 15.2 ± 4.4% of group I patients and 6.2 ± 4.2% of patients in the comparisongroup. The sensitivity of the method was 15.2%, specificity – 93.7%, positive and negativepredicted value – 83.3% and 34.8%, respectively, with odds ratio – 2.6 [95% CI: 0.5-13,0]. The average content of leukocytes in the blood less than 8.9 × 109/l was registeredin 57.6% of patients of group I and 48.8% of representatives of the second (P˃0.05). Thesensitivity of this laboratory test in the detection of non-streptococcal tonsillopharyngitiswas 57.6%, specificity – 55.6%, predicted value of a positive result – 54.1%, predictedvalue of a negative result – 59.1%. The relative risk of non-streptococcal etiology of ATPwhen registering a patient with less than 8.9 × 109/l of peripheral blood leukocytes was1.7 (95% CI 0.9-2.9), the absolute risk – 0.1 with odds ratio of 1.7 (95% CI 0.9-2.9).Conclusions. The proposed clinical scales and some paraclinical parameters haveinsufficient diagnostic value, so they cannot be used independently for early verificationof non-streptococcal etiology of tonsillopharyngitis in children.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床及实验室指标对小儿急性非链球菌性扁桃体咽炎的诊断意义
本研究旨在探讨临床及实验室参数在小儿急性非链球菌性扁桃体咽炎诊断中的诊断意义,以确定合理的治疗策略。材料和方法。为了达到这个目的,我们成立了两个临床小组。第一组(主要)为66例非链球菌性急性扁桃体咽炎患者,咽灌洗及咽后壁细菌检查阴性。第二(II)临床组包括32例诊断为“链球菌急性扁桃体咽炎”的儿童。McIsaac量表总分不超过2分,I组15.2±4.4%,对照组为6.2±4.2%。该方法的敏感性为15.2%,特异性为93.7%,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为83.3%和34.8%,优势比为2.6 [95% CI: 0.5 ~ 13,0]。第一组患者血液白细胞平均含量低于8.9 × 109/l的比例为57.6%,第二组为48.8% (P > 0.05)。该实验室检测非链球菌性扁桃体咽炎的敏感性为57.6%,特异性为55.6%,阳性预测值为54.1%,阴性预测值为59.1%。当登记的患者外周血白细胞低于8.9 × 109/l时,atp非链球菌病因的相对风险为1.7 (95% CI 0.9-2.9),绝对风险为- 0.1,优势比为1.7 (95% CI 0.9-2.9)。所提出的临床量表及部分临床旁参数的诊断价值不足,不能独立用于儿童扁桃体咽炎非链球菌病原学的早期验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SOME FEATURES OF ARTERIAL AND VENOUS HEMODYNAMICS IN PATIENTS WITH ESSENTIAL HYPERTENTION STAGE II WITH DIFFERENT VARIANTS OF THE BLOOD PRESSURE DAILY STRUCTURE CLINICAL AND EPIDEMIOLOGICAL PECULIARITIES IF COVID-19 INFECTION IN INFANTS DIAGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF CLINICAL AND LABORATORY INDICES IN VERIFICATION OF ACUTE NON-STREPTOCOCCAL TONSYLOPHARYNGITIS IN CHILDREN PECULIARITIES OF THE CLINICAL COURSE OF NON-ALCOHOLIC STEATOHEPATITIS AND STEATOSIS OF THE LIVER AT COMORBID WITH CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE I-III STAGE TEACHING OF CLINICAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY TO FOREIGN STUDENTS IN REMOTE CONDITIONS: ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1