One More Time on the Zone of Proximal Development

IF 0.6 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Kulturno-Istoricheskaya Psikhologiya-Cultural-Historical Psychology Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.17759/chp.2021170204
V. Zaretsky
{"title":"One More Time on the Zone of Proximal Development","authors":"V. Zaretsky","doi":"10.17759/chp.2021170204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents an analysis of L.S. Vygotsky’s concept of a zone of proximal development (ZPD); considers various ZPD definitions; provides a critical review of the most popular definition of ZPD as adopted from L.S. Vygotsky’s 1935 work and used as basic by English-speaking authors. Taking into account the fact that L.S. Vygotsky’s general methodological intention was to establish psychology as a practice and that his developmental theory as well as the ZPD concept development remained incomplete due to the known life circumstances, we analyze L.S. Vygotsky’s writings that allow for another ZPD conceptualization, which differs from the one implied by the 1935 definition, so as to attempt at reconstructing the concept. In reviewing L.S. Vygotsky’s assumptions regarding the learning-development relationship; ZPD; its relevance for diagnostic assessment and teaching; feasibility of extrapolating the ZPD concept onto different personality aspects, the authors identify substantive aspects of the ZPD concept that the \"canonical\" definition lacks. The article describes a multidimensional model of ZPD, which has taken shape within the Reflection-Activity Approach to assisting students with overcoming learning difficulties and which integrates Vygotsky's key ZPD-related ideas. E.G. Yudin’s conceptualization of methodological functions of conceptual schemes is used to reconstruct the methodological status of the ZPD concept. The authors demonstrate that, since its inception, the ZPD concept has passed through the stages of an explanatory principle, a research subject, and a methodological tool for constructing new subjects of research and development.","PeriodicalId":44568,"journal":{"name":"Kulturno-Istoricheskaya Psikhologiya-Cultural-Historical Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kulturno-Istoricheskaya Psikhologiya-Cultural-Historical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2021170204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The article presents an analysis of L.S. Vygotsky’s concept of a zone of proximal development (ZPD); considers various ZPD definitions; provides a critical review of the most popular definition of ZPD as adopted from L.S. Vygotsky’s 1935 work and used as basic by English-speaking authors. Taking into account the fact that L.S. Vygotsky’s general methodological intention was to establish psychology as a practice and that his developmental theory as well as the ZPD concept development remained incomplete due to the known life circumstances, we analyze L.S. Vygotsky’s writings that allow for another ZPD conceptualization, which differs from the one implied by the 1935 definition, so as to attempt at reconstructing the concept. In reviewing L.S. Vygotsky’s assumptions regarding the learning-development relationship; ZPD; its relevance for diagnostic assessment and teaching; feasibility of extrapolating the ZPD concept onto different personality aspects, the authors identify substantive aspects of the ZPD concept that the "canonical" definition lacks. The article describes a multidimensional model of ZPD, which has taken shape within the Reflection-Activity Approach to assisting students with overcoming learning difficulties and which integrates Vygotsky's key ZPD-related ideas. E.G. Yudin’s conceptualization of methodological functions of conceptual schemes is used to reconstruct the methodological status of the ZPD concept. The authors demonstrate that, since its inception, the ZPD concept has passed through the stages of an explanatory principle, a research subject, and a methodological tool for constructing new subjects of research and development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
再一次讨论最近发展区
本文对维果茨基的“最近发展带”概念进行了分析;考虑各种ZPD定义;对从维果茨基(L.S. Vygotsky) 1935年的著作中采纳并被英语作家作为基础的最流行的ZPD定义进行了批判性的回顾。考虑到维果茨基的总体方法论意图是将心理学建立为一种实践,而他的发展理论和ZPD概念的发展由于已知的生活环境而仍然不完整,我们分析了维果茨基的著作中允许另一种不同于1935年定义的ZPD概念,从而试图重建这个概念。维果斯基关于学习与发展关系的假设述评ZPD;它与诊断性评估和教学的相关性;将ZPD概念外推到不同人格方面的可行性,作者确定了“规范”定义所缺乏的ZPD概念的实质性方面。本文描述了一个多维的ZPD模型,该模型在反思活动方法中形成,以帮助学生克服学习困难,并整合了维果茨基与ZPD相关的关键思想。例如,Yudin对概念方案的方法论功能的概念化被用来重建ZPD概念的方法论地位。作者证明,自诞生以来,ZPD概念经历了解释原则、研究主题和构建新研究和发展主题的方法论工具的阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Actor Training: Competencies or Aptitude Russian Version of the Sources of Spirituality Scale On the Problem of the Semantic Structure of Consciousness Development of Social and Psychological Readiness for Professional and Working Life in Students with Intellectual Disabilities Development of Formal-logical and Dialectical Thinking in Children of 5-8 Years Old
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1