Dynamic Analysis of a Multistory Frame RC Building with and Without Floating Columns

A. Ibrahim, H. Askar
{"title":"Dynamic Analysis of a Multistory Frame RC Building with and Without Floating Columns","authors":"A. Ibrahim, H. Askar","doi":"10.11648/J.AJCE.20210906.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper tends to evaluate the behavior of five- story RC building with and without floating columns using RC frames as lateral resisting system. This investigation had been carried-out using ETABS Ultimate V.18.1.1. The defined load cases, load combinations, the equivalent static lateral load pattern, and the response spectrum function were defined according ASCE7-16. The design criteria were set to be according to ACI 318-14. Eleven cases were proposed to investigate this behavior. One case was the building without floating columns. Nine cases were the building with different floating column schemes and the final case was the building with floating columns and another lateral resisting system (shear walls) for comparison purpose. Further comparisons of the results for all models are executed on the basis of parameters such as, story displacement, story drift, story stiffness, and response spectrum modal period. The results showed that, although the floating columns play an important role in architectural divisions or in multi-use buildings, but it affected the stiffness of the building negatively that led to increasing of the story lateral displacement and drift, also it led to increasing of modal time period. This mostly led to using a more stiffness lateral resisting system and eventually increasing the building’s structural costs.","PeriodicalId":7606,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"139 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.AJCE.20210906.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper tends to evaluate the behavior of five- story RC building with and without floating columns using RC frames as lateral resisting system. This investigation had been carried-out using ETABS Ultimate V.18.1.1. The defined load cases, load combinations, the equivalent static lateral load pattern, and the response spectrum function were defined according ASCE7-16. The design criteria were set to be according to ACI 318-14. Eleven cases were proposed to investigate this behavior. One case was the building without floating columns. Nine cases were the building with different floating column schemes and the final case was the building with floating columns and another lateral resisting system (shear walls) for comparison purpose. Further comparisons of the results for all models are executed on the basis of parameters such as, story displacement, story drift, story stiffness, and response spectrum modal period. The results showed that, although the floating columns play an important role in architectural divisions or in multi-use buildings, but it affected the stiffness of the building negatively that led to increasing of the story lateral displacement and drift, also it led to increasing of modal time period. This mostly led to using a more stiffness lateral resisting system and eventually increasing the building’s structural costs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有无浮柱的多层框架钢筋混凝土建筑动力分析
本文试图以钢筋混凝土框架作为横向抗力体系,对有无浮动柱的五层钢筋混凝土建筑进行性能评价。本研究使用ETABS Ultimate V.18.1.1进行。根据ASCE7-16定义了荷载工况、荷载组合、等效静侧向荷载模式和响应谱函数。设计标准根据ACI 318-14制定。提出了11个案例来调查这种行为。一个例子是没有浮柱的建筑。9个案例是采用不同浮柱方案的建筑,最后一个案例是采用浮柱和另一种侧抗体系(剪力墙)的建筑,以进行比较。在诸如层位移、层漂移、层刚度和响应谱模态周期等参数的基础上,对所有模型的结果进行了进一步的比较。结果表明:虽然浮柱在建筑分区或多用途建筑中发挥着重要作用,但它对建筑的刚度产生负面影响,导致楼层横向位移和漂移增大,并导致模态周期增大。这主要导致使用更刚度的横向抵抗系统,最终增加了建筑物的结构成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conformance and Performance Evaluation of Land Use Plan of Yirba Town Performance of Simplified Damage-Based Concrete Models in Seismic Applications Pavement Service Life Prediction with PLAXIS 3D in Bangladesh Surface-Modified Nanoclays for Enhancing Resistance to Moisture Damage in Hot Mix Asphalt Structural Performance Evaluation of Diversion Weir Structure: Case Study of Basaka Small Scale Irrigation Scheme, Oromia, Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1