{"title":"Innovation and Inland Oil Spill Response","authors":"Nickolas Dyer","doi":"10.7901/2169-3358-2021.1.1141675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Advances in technology and a sustained demand for oil mean exploration is being driven into more remote, fragile environments (Ivshina et al, 2015). Therefore, the number of drilling campaigns in remote inland locations is set to increase, so we should be prepared for a corresponding increase in the number of spills. This changing risk profile should in-turn be reflected in the oil spill response organisation (OSRO) community.\n Whilst advances in offshore techniques and specialist equipment are plentiful, there appears to be scope for greater innovation in inland response. It is not uncommon for response plans to bear a close resemblance to those written in excess of 10 years ago, when the Macondo blow-out stimulated investment and a subsequent increase in offshore response capabilities.\n This apparent disparity is surprising given offshore responses tend to orientate round either traditional containment and recovery measures or the use of dispersants, in contrast with inland response tactics which are often subject to a higher degree of site specificity.\n There is a real appetite to add to the range of tactics available to OSROs. Precursors to change might include one or more of the following; field trials, better information sharing between response organisations and impressing upon manufacturers the potential value of developing proprietary inland spill equipment. This poster will explore some of the areas in inland response where there is scope for innovation.","PeriodicalId":14447,"journal":{"name":"International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7901/2169-3358-2021.1.1141675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Advances in technology and a sustained demand for oil mean exploration is being driven into more remote, fragile environments (Ivshina et al, 2015). Therefore, the number of drilling campaigns in remote inland locations is set to increase, so we should be prepared for a corresponding increase in the number of spills. This changing risk profile should in-turn be reflected in the oil spill response organisation (OSRO) community.
Whilst advances in offshore techniques and specialist equipment are plentiful, there appears to be scope for greater innovation in inland response. It is not uncommon for response plans to bear a close resemblance to those written in excess of 10 years ago, when the Macondo blow-out stimulated investment and a subsequent increase in offshore response capabilities.
This apparent disparity is surprising given offshore responses tend to orientate round either traditional containment and recovery measures or the use of dispersants, in contrast with inland response tactics which are often subject to a higher degree of site specificity.
There is a real appetite to add to the range of tactics available to OSROs. Precursors to change might include one or more of the following; field trials, better information sharing between response organisations and impressing upon manufacturers the potential value of developing proprietary inland spill equipment. This poster will explore some of the areas in inland response where there is scope for innovation.
技术的进步和对石油的持续需求意味着勘探正被推向更偏远、更脆弱的环境(Ivshina et al, 2015)。因此,偏远内陆地区的钻井活动数量将会增加,因此我们应该为泄漏数量的相应增加做好准备。这种不断变化的风险状况应该反过来反映在溢油应急组织(OSRO)社区中。虽然海上技术和专业设备的进步很多,但在内陆响应方面似乎还有更大的创新空间。响应计划与十多年前制定的计划非常相似,这并不罕见,当时Macondo井喷刺激了投资,随后增加了海上响应能力。这种明显的差异是令人惊讶的,因为海上的反应往往是围绕传统的遏制和恢复措施或分散剂的使用,而内陆的反应策略往往受到更高程度的现场特异性的影响。人们确实希望增加osro可用的战术范围。变更的前体可能包括以下一项或多项:现场试验,响应组织之间更好的信息共享,以及向制造商展示开发专有内陆泄漏设备的潜在价值。这张海报将探讨内陆响应中存在创新空间的一些领域。