Published Accounts, Stewardship, and Decision Making: A Case Study 1863–1940

IF 2.5 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Abacus-A Journal of Accounting Finance and Business Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-03 DOI:10.1111/abac.12251
J. Edwards, T. Boyns
{"title":"Published Accounts, Stewardship, and Decision Making: A Case Study 1863–1940","authors":"J. Edwards, T. Boyns","doi":"10.1111/abac.12251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The conventional wisdom is that (i) the published accounts of British registered companies ful fi lled a narrow stewardship role from inception (1844) through to 1947 when the Companies Act added signi fi cantly to statutory disclosure requirements, and (ii) the ‘ decision useful ’ role of published fi nancial reports is the creation of ‘ golden age ’ accounting thinkers in the 1950s and 1960s. Our paper challenges this version of the history of stewardship and decision usefulness based on an in-depth study of the archives of the Staveley Coal and Iron Co. Ltd for the period 1863 – 1940. In so doing, the idea that stewardship and decision usefulness served as competing objectives of fi nancial reporting is rejected as a false dichotomy. Our fi ndings are consistent with Bryer ’ s (1993) proposition that modern fi nancial reporting developed in the late-nineteenth century to provide useful information for purposes of investor decision making. Further, we fi nd that fi nancial reporting practices were based on a conceptual framework within which prudence (or conservatism) served as a fundamental accounting principle.","PeriodicalId":47285,"journal":{"name":"Abacus-A Journal of Accounting Finance and Business Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abacus-A Journal of Accounting Finance and Business Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12251","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The conventional wisdom is that (i) the published accounts of British registered companies ful fi lled a narrow stewardship role from inception (1844) through to 1947 when the Companies Act added signi fi cantly to statutory disclosure requirements, and (ii) the ‘ decision useful ’ role of published fi nancial reports is the creation of ‘ golden age ’ accounting thinkers in the 1950s and 1960s. Our paper challenges this version of the history of stewardship and decision usefulness based on an in-depth study of the archives of the Staveley Coal and Iron Co. Ltd for the period 1863 – 1940. In so doing, the idea that stewardship and decision usefulness served as competing objectives of fi nancial reporting is rejected as a false dichotomy. Our fi ndings are consistent with Bryer ’ s (1993) proposition that modern fi nancial reporting developed in the late-nineteenth century to provide useful information for purposes of investor decision making. Further, we fi nd that fi nancial reporting practices were based on a conceptual framework within which prudence (or conservatism) served as a fundamental accounting principle.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
出版的帐目,管理和决策:1863-1940年的案例研究
传统观点认为(i)英国注册公司的公开账目从创立(1844年)到1947年《公司法》显著增加了法定披露要求,完全扮演了一个狭隘的管理角色,(ii)公开财务报告的“决策有用”角色是20世纪50年代和60年代“黄金时代”会计思想家的创造。我们的论文基于对斯塔维利煤铁有限公司1863 - 1940年期间档案的深入研究,挑战了这种管理和决策有用性历史的版本。在这样做的过程中,管理和决策有用性作为财务报告的竞争目标的想法被拒绝为错误的二分法。我们的发现与Bryer(1993)的主张一致,即现代财务报告发展于19世纪后期,为投资者决策提供有用的信息。此外,我们发现财务报告实践是基于审慎(或稳健性)作为基本会计原则的概念框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Since 1965 Abacus has consistently provided a vehicle for the expression of independent and critical thought on matters of current academic and professional interest in accounting, finance and business. The journal reports current research; critically evaluates current developments in theory and practice; analyses the effects of the regulatory framework of accounting, finance and business; and explores alternatives to, and explanations of, past and current practices.
期刊最新文献
Boosting Government Assets as A Revenue Center: Risk and Treatment The Effect of Organizational Climate on Sell‐side Analyst Turnover and Performance Ex‐military Top Executives and Corporate Violations: Evidence from China Corporate Governance Reforms and Analyst Forecasts: International Evidence Analysts’ Earnings per Share Forecasts: The Effects of Forecast Uncertainty and Forecast Precision on Investor Judgements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1