Accuracy comparison between Gompertz and polynomial based PV models

Y. Mahmoud, E. El-Saadany
{"title":"Accuracy comparison between Gompertz and polynomial based PV models","authors":"Y. Mahmoud, E. El-Saadany","doi":"10.1109/SEGE.2015.7324616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various photovoltaic PV models of different complexity exist in the literature. The modeling accuracy for most of them is directly related to their complexity and computational effort. Recently, two newly developed PV models featuring low computational effort and high accuracy appeared in the literature. The first model is developed based on Gompertz model which is originally used to model human mortality, and the second relies on a polynomial function which represents the voltage drop in the model series resistance. Because both models have similar features, their pros and cons are not clear and thus it is challenging for users to decide which model is more suitable for a particular PV application. This paper constructs a comparison between the two models showing their pros and cons. The results of the paper would be beneficial for PV system designers and researchers to select the appropriate model for a specific PV application.","PeriodicalId":6654,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE)","volume":"120 1","pages":"3278-3281"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEGE.2015.7324616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Various photovoltaic PV models of different complexity exist in the literature. The modeling accuracy for most of them is directly related to their complexity and computational effort. Recently, two newly developed PV models featuring low computational effort and high accuracy appeared in the literature. The first model is developed based on Gompertz model which is originally used to model human mortality, and the second relies on a polynomial function which represents the voltage drop in the model series resistance. Because both models have similar features, their pros and cons are not clear and thus it is challenging for users to decide which model is more suitable for a particular PV application. This paper constructs a comparison between the two models showing their pros and cons. The results of the paper would be beneficial for PV system designers and researchers to select the appropriate model for a specific PV application.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gompertz与多项式PV模型的精度比较
文献中存在着各种不同复杂程度的光伏模型。大多数模型的建模精度直接关系到模型的复杂性和计算量。近年来,文献中出现了两种计算量低、精度高的新PV模型。第一个模型是基于最初用于模拟人类死亡率的Gompertz模型开发的,第二个模型依赖于表示模型串联电阻中电压降的多项式函数。由于两种模型具有相似的功能,它们的优点和缺点并不清楚,因此用户决定哪种模型更适合特定的光伏应用是具有挑战性的。本文构建了两种模型的比较,展示了它们的优缺点。本文的研究结果将有助于光伏系统的设计者和研究人员针对具体的光伏应用选择合适的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Accuracy comparison between Gompertz and polynomial based PV models Grid synchronization for a virtual direct power-controlled DFIG wind power system Enhancement on capacitor-voltage-balancing capability of a modular multilevel cascade inverter for medium-voltage synchronous-motor drives State observer for sensorless control of a grid-connected converter equipped with an LCL filter: Direct discrete-time design Multi-tap transformer topologies for improved tolerance against misalignment in inductive power transfer systems for electric vehicles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1