Salvage Companies as OSROs: Benefits and Limitations

Nicky Cariglia
{"title":"Salvage Companies as OSROs: Benefits and Limitations","authors":"Nicky Cariglia","doi":"10.7901/2169-3358-2021.1.689610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Response to oil spills in remote locations have long be limited primarily by logistical considerations. Frequently, issues associated with these cases are driven by lack of infrastructure, preparedness and regional capacity. Whilst year on year the number of significant ship-source oil spills have been on the decrease and global response preparedness has generally improved, in remote areas they still present a challenge which can prolong the response and associated impacts.\n Correlated with oil spills the salvage industry has also seen a steady decline in the number of major casualties. However, the need for salvage contractors to maintain adequate capacity, infrastructure, equipment and expertise to be able to respond to major casualties as and when they occur still remains. This is especially important with the construction of ever larger vessels. The backdrop of fewer casualties, whilst needing to retain capacity to deal with increasingly complex salvage operations has resulted in an attempt to diversify and expand services provided by salvage contractors. Oil spill response (OSR) has been viewed by some as a natural extension to the salvage industry's remit to prevent pollution from casualties. This is particularly so for remote cases where advanced logistics, the ability to support a large cash-flow and global contacts are key to implement a response. Such regions are less likely to have established OSR organisations able, experienced or large enough to respond to the situation.\n Several recent cases have demonstrated that salvage contractors could be in a unique position to fill these gaps. However, based on recent experience from several cases where salvage contractors have overseen OSR operations, there are several limitations that should be addressed by these organisations to cement their position in this role. This paper discusses the strengths and weaknesses of salvage contractors in OSR as observed by the authors over several cases and presents lessons learned with general recommendations for such organisations to sustainably complement the OSR sector.","PeriodicalId":14447,"journal":{"name":"International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7901/2169-3358-2021.1.689610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Response to oil spills in remote locations have long be limited primarily by logistical considerations. Frequently, issues associated with these cases are driven by lack of infrastructure, preparedness and regional capacity. Whilst year on year the number of significant ship-source oil spills have been on the decrease and global response preparedness has generally improved, in remote areas they still present a challenge which can prolong the response and associated impacts. Correlated with oil spills the salvage industry has also seen a steady decline in the number of major casualties. However, the need for salvage contractors to maintain adequate capacity, infrastructure, equipment and expertise to be able to respond to major casualties as and when they occur still remains. This is especially important with the construction of ever larger vessels. The backdrop of fewer casualties, whilst needing to retain capacity to deal with increasingly complex salvage operations has resulted in an attempt to diversify and expand services provided by salvage contractors. Oil spill response (OSR) has been viewed by some as a natural extension to the salvage industry's remit to prevent pollution from casualties. This is particularly so for remote cases where advanced logistics, the ability to support a large cash-flow and global contacts are key to implement a response. Such regions are less likely to have established OSR organisations able, experienced or large enough to respond to the situation. Several recent cases have demonstrated that salvage contractors could be in a unique position to fill these gaps. However, based on recent experience from several cases where salvage contractors have overseen OSR operations, there are several limitations that should be addressed by these organisations to cement their position in this role. This paper discusses the strengths and weaknesses of salvage contractors in OSR as observed by the authors over several cases and presents lessons learned with general recommendations for such organisations to sustainably complement the OSR sector.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
打捞公司作为osro:利益与限制
长期以来,对偏远地区石油泄漏的反应主要受到后勤考虑的限制。与这些案件相关的问题往往是由于缺乏基础设施、防范和区域能力造成的。虽然重大船舶源溢油事件的数量逐年减少,全球应对准备工作总体上有所改善,但在偏远地区,它们仍然是一个挑战,可能会延长应对时间并产生相关影响。与石油泄漏相关的打捞行业也看到了重大伤亡人数的稳步下降。但是,仍然需要打捞承包商保持足够的能力、基础设施、设备和专门知识,以便能够在重大伤亡发生时作出反应。这在建造越来越大的船只时尤为重要。由于伤亡人数减少,同时需要保持处理日益复杂的打捞作业的能力,因此,打捞承包商试图提供多样化和扩大服务。一些人认为,溢油响应(OSR)是救助行业防止伤亡污染职责的自然延伸。对于偏远地区的情况尤其如此,因为先进的物流、支持大量现金流的能力和全球联系是实施应对措施的关键。这些地区不太可能建立有能力、有经验或足够大的OSR组织来应对这种情况。最近的几个案例表明,打捞承包商在填补这些空白方面可能处于独特的地位。然而,根据最近打捞承包商监督OSR作业的几个案例的经验,这些组织应该解决几个限制,以巩固其在这一角色中的地位。本文讨论了作者在几个案例中观察到的救助承包商在OSR中的优势和劣势,并为这些组织提供了可持续补充OSR部门的一般建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From the deep ocean to the coasts and estuaries through the shelf: linking coastal response to a deep blow-out Case Study of a SCAT Survey and Successful Remediation Strategy by Mechanical Mixing of a Fuel Oil Spill into a Mountain Stream Using Oil Spill Modeling in Oil Spill Exercises and Drills In Situ Burn Testing of Weathered and Emulsified Crude Oils Historical Dispersant Use in U.S. Waters 1968–2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1